Literature DB >> 30972475

Assessment of Muscle Function and Physical Performance in Daily Clinical Practice : A position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

Charlotte Beaudart1,2, Yves Rolland3, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft4, Jürgen M Bauer5, Cornel Sieber6, Cyrus Cooper7,8, Nasser Al-Daghri9, Islene Araujo de Carvalho10, Ivan Bautmans11, Roberto Bernabei12, Olivier Bruyère13,14, Matteo Cesari15,16, Antonio Cherubini17, Bess Dawson-Hughes18, John A Kanis19,20, Jean-Marc Kaufman21, Francesco Landi12, Stefania Maggi22, Eugene McCloskey19,20,21,22,23, Jean Petermans24, Leocadio Rodriguez Mañas25, Jean-Yves Reginster1,2, Regina Roller-Wirnsberger26, Laura A Schaap27, Daniel Uebelhart28, René Rizzoli29, Roger A Fielding30.   

Abstract

It is well recognized that poor muscle function and poor physical performance are strong predictors of clinically relevant adverse events in older people. Given the large number of approaches to measure muscle function and physical performance, clinicians often struggle to choose a tool that is appropriate and validated for the population of older people they deal with. In this paper, an overview of different methods available and applicable in clinical settings is proposed. This paper is based on literature reviews performed by members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) working group on frailty and sarcopenia. Face-to-face meetings were organized afterwards where the whole group could amend and discuss the recommendations further. Several characteristics should be considered when choosing a tool: (1) purpose of the assessment (intervention, screening, diagnosis); (2) patient characteristics (population, settings, functional ability, etc.); (3) psychometric properties of the tool (test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, etc.); (4) applicability of the tool in clinical settings (overall cost, time required for the examination, level of training, equipment, patient acceptance, etc.); (5) prognostic reliability for relevant clinical outcomes. Based on these criteria and the available evidence, the expert group advises the use of grip strength to measure muscle strength and the use of 4-m gait speed or the Short Physical Performance Battery test to measure physical performance in daily practice. The tools proposed are relevant for the assessment of muscle weakness and physical performance. Subjects with low values should receive additional diagnostic workups to achieve a full diagnosis of the underlying condition responsible (sarcopenia, frailty or other).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Daily practice; Muscle function; Muscle strenght; Physical performance; Sarcopenia

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30972475     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-019-00545-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  65 in total

1.  Impact of exercise training on the sarcopenia criteria in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Gonzalez; Mayalen Valero-Breton; Camila Huerta-Salgado; Oscar Achiardi; Felipe Simon; Claudio Cabello-Verrugio
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2021-03-26

2.  Are we maximizing the utility of handgrip strength assessments for evaluating muscle function?

Authors:  Ryan McGrath
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Sex- and Age-Specific Centile Curves and Downloadable Calculator for Clinical Muscle Strength Tests to Identify Probable Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Ziyue Liu; Sharon M Moe
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-03-01

4.  Phenotypic Frailty Assessment in Mice: Development, Discoveries, and Experimental Considerations.

Authors:  Cory W Baumann; Dongmin Kwak; LaDora V Thompson
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-11-01

5.  Assessing Additional Characteristics of Muscle Function With Digital Handgrip Dynamometry and Accelerometry: Framework for a Novel Handgrip Strength Protocol.

Authors:  Ryan McGrath; Grant R Tomkinson; Brian C Clark; Peggy M Cawthon; Matteo Cesari; Soham Al Snih; Donald A Jurivich; Kyle J Hackney
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  The Associations of Handgrip Strength and Leg Extension Power Asymmetry on Incident Recurrent Falls and Fractures in Older Men.

Authors:  Ryan McGrath; Terri L Blackwell; Kristine E Ensrud; Brenda M Vincent; Peggy M Cawthon
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Singapore multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on muscle health in older adults: assessment and multimodal targeted intervention across the continuum of care.

Authors:  Samuel T H Chew; Geetha Kayambu; Charles Chin Han Lew; Tze Pin Ng; Fangyi Ong; Jonathan Tan; Ngiap Chuan Tan; Shuen-Loong Tham
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 8.  Exercise-Based Interventions to Counteract Skeletal Muscle Mass Loss in People with Cancer: Can We Overcome the Odds?

Authors:  Kelcey A Bland; Imre W K Kouw; Luc J C van Loon; Eva M Zopf; Ciaran M Fairman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Associations between gait speed and brain structure in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a quantitative neuroimaging study.

Authors:  Pauline Ali; Matthieu Labriffe; Paul Paisant; Marc Antoine Custaud; Cédric Annweiler; Mickaël Dinomais
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.978

10.  Low-volume cycling training improves body composition and functionality in older people with multimorbidity: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eduardo Carballeira; Karla C Censi; Ana Maseda; Rocío López-López; Laura Lorenzo-López; José C Millán-Calenti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.