| Literature DB >> 30971074 |
Sangho Sohn1, Wonju Cho2, Jin A Kim2, Alaa Altaluoni2, Kwan Hong1, Byung Chul Chun1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Many studies have explored the relationship between short-term weather and its health effects (including pneumonia) based on mortality, although both morbidity and mortality pose a substantial burden. In this study, the authors aimed to describe the influence of meteorological factors on the number of emergency room (ER) visits due to pneumonia in Seoul, Korea.Entities:
Keywords: Emergency service; Generalized additive model; Pneumonia; Public health; Weather
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30971074 PMCID: PMC6459762 DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.18.232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Prev Med Public Health ISSN: 1975-8375
Number of daily emergency room visits for pneumonia in Seoul from 2009 to 2014
| Variables | Cases, n (%) |
|---|---|
| Year | |
| 2009 | 53 913 (24.8) |
| 2010 | 31 276 (14.4) |
| 2011 | 34 742 (15.9) |
| 2012 | 32 819 (15.1) |
| 2013 | 24 941 (11.4) |
| 2014 | 40 085 (18.4) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 119 354 (54.8) |
| Female | 98 422 (45.2) |
| Age (y) | |
| 0-5 | 84 383 (38.7) |
| 6-18 | 28 860 (13.2) |
| 19-64 | 54 926 (25.2) |
| ≥65 | 49 607 (22.8) |
| Holidays | |
| Non-holiday | 165 511 (76.0) |
| Holiday | 52 265 (24.0) |
| Sunday | 41 544 (19.1) |
Figure. 1.Time-series plots of pneumonia ER cases (A) and meteorological variables (B: average temperature, C: pneumonia temperature, D: DTR, E: precipitation, F: relative humidity). No changes in the overall trend were found for either the case count of pneumonia patients visiting the ER or for each meteorological factor. However, the number of patients peaked in 2009 due to pandemic influenza. ER, emergency room; DTR, diurnal temperature range.
Summary statistics of meteorological factors in Seoul
| Factors | Mean | SD | Min | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAVE (°C) | 12.6 | 10.9 | -14.5 | 3.4 | 14.2 | 22.7 | 31.8 |
| DTR (°C) | 8.2 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 6.2 | 8.2 | 10.2 | 17.6 |
| RH (%) | 60.5 | 15.1 | 20.1 | 49.4 | 60.4 | 71.6 | 99.8 |
| PR (mm/d) | 4.3 | 17.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 301.5 |
| WS (m/sec) | 2.6 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 7.5 |
SD, standard deviation; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; TAVE, daily average temperature; DTR, diurnal temperature range; RH, relative humidity; PR, daily precipitation; WS, daily average wind speed.
Figure. 2.Fitted spline curves for meteorological variables. The estimated effects of meteorological factors showed similar patterns in all ages (A) and in children (B). However, the elderly (C) showed different patterns for the average temperature and DTR. TPN, pneumonia temperature; TAVE, daily average temperature; DTR, diurnal temperature range; RH, relative humidity; WS, daily average wind speed; RR, relative risk. *p<0.05.
Effects of meteorological factors on emergency room visits for pneumonia
| Age (y) | TPN | TAVE | DTR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment RR (95% CI) | Segment RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | ||||
| All[ | TPN <-10 | -10≤TPN <6 | 6≤TPN | TAVE <14 | 14≤TAVE | - |
| 1.40 (1.00, 1.98) | 0.99 (0.98, 1.00) | 1.89 (1.36, 2.61)[ | 1.01 (1.01, 1.02)[ | 0.93 (0.92, 0.93)[ | 0.96 (0.94, 0.98)[ | |
| 0-5[ | TPN <-10 | -10≤TPN <6 | 6≤TPN | TAVE <14 | 14≤TAVE | - |
| 1.45 (0.99, 2.11) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) | 1.89 (1.34, 2.67)[ | 1.02 (1.01, 1.03)[ | 0.92 (0.91, 0.92)[ | 0.98 (0.97, 0.99)[ | |
| >65[ | Not measured | TAVE <16 | 16≤TAVE | - | ||
| 0.98 (0.98, 0.98)[ | 1.01 (1.00, 1.02)[ | 1.08 (1.06, 1.09)[ | ||||
TPN, pneumonia temperature; TAVE, daily average temperature; DTR, diurnal temperature range; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; RH, relative humidity; WS, daily average wind speed.
Controlled for TPN lag7, TAVE lag0-7, DTR lag0-7, RH, WS, holiday, time.
Controlled for TPN lag7, TAVE lag0-7, DTR lag7, RH, WS, holiday, time.
Controlled for TPN lag4, TAVE lag0-7, DTR lag0-7, RH, WS, holiday, time.
p<0.05.