Michael F Egan1, James Kost1, Tiffini Voss1, Yuki Mukai1, Paul S Aisen1, Jeffrey L Cummings1, Pierre N Tariot1, Bruno Vellas1, Christopher H van Dyck1, Merce Boada1, Ying Zhang1, Wen Li1, Christine Furtek1, Erin Mahoney1, Lyn Harper Mozley1, Yi Mo1, Cyrille Sur1, David Michelson1. 1. From Merck, Kenilworth, NJ (M.F.E., J.K., T.V., Y. Mukai, Y.Z., W.L., C.F., E.M., L.H.M., Y. Mo, C.S., D.M.); the University of Southern California, San Diego (P.S.A.); Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas (J.L.C.); Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ (P.N.T.); Gerontopole, INSERM Unité 1027, Alzheimer's Disease Research and Clinical Center, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France (B.V.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (C.H.D.); and the Research Center and Memory Clínic, Fundació Alzheimer Centre Educacional, Institut Català de Neurociènces Aplicades-Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, and the Network Center for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid - both in Spain (M.B.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Prodromal Alzheimer's disease offers an opportunity to test the effect of drugs that modify the deposition of amyloid in the brain before the onset of dementia. Verubecestat is an orally administered β-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1) inhibitor that blocks production of amyloid-beta (Aβ). The drug did not prevent clinical progression in a trial involving patients with mild-to-moderate dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 104-week trial to evaluate verubecestat at doses of 12 mg and 40 mg per day, as compared with placebo, in patients who had memory impairment and elevated brain amyloid levels but whose condition did not meet the case definition of dementia. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to week 104 in the score on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB; scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating worse cognition and daily function). Secondary outcomes included other assessments of cognition and daily function. RESULTS: The trial was terminated for futility after 1454 patients had been enrolled; 485 had been assigned to receive verubecestat at a dose of 12 mg per day (the 12-mg group), 484 to receive verubecestat at a dose of 40 mg per day (the 40-mg group), and 485 to receive placebo. A total of 234 patients, 231 patients, and 239 patients per group, respectively, completed 104 weeks of the trial regimen. The estimated mean change from baseline to week 104 in the CDR-SB score was 1.65 in the 12-mg group, 2.02 in the 40-mg group, and 1.58 in the placebo group (P = 0.67 for the comparison between the 12-mg group and the placebo group and P = 0.01 for the comparison between the 40-mg group and the placebo group), suggesting a worse outcome in the higher-dose group than in the placebo group. The estimated rate of progression to dementia due to Alzheimer's disease was 24.5, 25.5, and 19.3 events per 100 patient-years in the 12-mg group, the 40-mg group, and the placebo group, respectively (hazard ratio for 40 mg vs. placebo, 1.38; 97.51% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.79, not adjusted for multiple comparisons), favoring placebo. Adverse events were more common in the verubecestat groups than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Verubecestat did not improve clinical ratings of dementia among patients with prodromal Alzheimer's disease, and some measures suggested that cognition and daily function were worse among patients who received verubecestat than among those who received placebo. (Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01953601.).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Prodromal Alzheimer's disease offers an opportunity to test the effect of drugs that modify the deposition of amyloid in the brain before the onset of dementia. Verubecestat is an orally administered β-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1) inhibitor that blocks production of amyloid-beta (Aβ). The drug did not prevent clinical progression in a trial involving patients with mild-to-moderate dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 104-week trial to evaluate verubecestat at doses of 12 mg and 40 mg per day, as compared with placebo, in patients who had memory impairment and elevated brain amyloid levels but whose condition did not meet the case definition of dementia. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to week 104 in the score on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB; scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating worse cognition and daily function). Secondary outcomes included other assessments of cognition and daily function. RESULTS: The trial was terminated for futility after 1454 patients had been enrolled; 485 had been assigned to receive verubecestat at a dose of 12 mg per day (the 12-mg group), 484 to receive verubecestat at a dose of 40 mg per day (the 40-mg group), and 485 to receive placebo. A total of 234 patients, 231 patients, and 239 patients per group, respectively, completed 104 weeks of the trial regimen. The estimated mean change from baseline to week 104 in the CDR-SB score was 1.65 in the 12-mg group, 2.02 in the 40-mg group, and 1.58 in the placebo group (P = 0.67 for the comparison between the 12-mg group and the placebo group and P = 0.01 for the comparison between the 40-mg group and the placebo group), suggesting a worse outcome in the higher-dose group than in the placebo group. The estimated rate of progression to dementia due to Alzheimer's disease was 24.5, 25.5, and 19.3 events per 100 patient-years in the 12-mg group, the 40-mg group, and the placebo group, respectively (hazard ratio for 40 mg vs. placebo, 1.38; 97.51% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.79, not adjusted for multiple comparisons), favoring placebo. Adverse events were more common in the verubecestat groups than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS:Verubecestat did not improve clinical ratings of dementia among patients with prodromal Alzheimer's disease, and some measures suggested that cognition and daily function were worse among patients who received verubecestat than among those who received placebo. (Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01953601.).
Authors: R C Mohs; D Knopman; R C Petersen; S H Ferris; C Ernesto; M Grundman; M Sano; L Bieliauskas; D Geldmacher; C Clark; L J Thal Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 1997 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Jeff Sevigny; Ping Chiao; Thierry Bussière; Paul H Weinreb; Leslie Williams; Marcel Maier; Robert Dunstan; Stephen Salloway; Tianle Chen; Yan Ling; John O'Gorman; Fang Qian; Mahin Arastu; Mingwei Li; Sowmya Chollate; Melanie S Brennan; Omar Quintero-Monzon; Robert H Scannevin; H Moore Arnold; Thomas Engber; Kenneth Rhodes; James Ferrero; Yaming Hang; Alvydas Mikulskis; Jan Grimm; Christoph Hock; Roger M Nitsch; Alfred Sandrock Journal: Nature Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kelly Posner; Gregory K Brown; Barbara Stanley; David A Brent; Kseniya V Yershova; Maria A Oquendo; Glenn W Currier; Glenn A Melvin; Laurence Greenhill; Sa Shen; J John Mann Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Michael F Egan; James Kost; Pierre N Tariot; Paul S Aisen; Jeffrey L Cummings; Bruno Vellas; Cyrille Sur; Yuki Mukai; Tiffini Voss; Christine Furtek; Erin Mahoney; Lyn Harper Mozley; Rik Vandenberghe; Yi Mo; David Michelson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Inmaculada Lopez-Font; Claudia P Boix; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Javier Sáez-Valero Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Paul J Derry; Muralidhar L Hegde; George R Jackson; Rakez Kayed; James M Tour; Ah-Lim Tsai; Thomas A Kent Journal: Prog Neurobiol Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 11.685
Authors: Yu-Chen Yen; Annalissa M Kammeyer; Katherine C Jensen; Jagannadharao Tirlangi; Arun K Ghosh; Andrew D Mesecar Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 3.162