Literature DB >> 30968329

Configuration of recipient corneal cut after mechanical trephination in keratoconus.

Sepehr Feizi1, Maryam Najafi2, Mohammad Ali Javadi2, Amir A Azari2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the roundness of recipient corneal cuts after mechanical trephination and to investigate possible factors that could affect the corneal bed configuration in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).
METHODS: This study enrolled 85 eyes with keratoconus that underwent DALK. Recipient corneas were partially trephined using a new, unused, disposable Hessburg-Barron suction trephine. Photographs that best represented the recipient corneal cut were selected, and ImageJ software was used to evaluate the roundness of recipient bed. The effect of potential variables on the roundness of cuts was investigated using the univariate analyses.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 31.0 ± 9.0 years. The mean recipient trephine size was 8.04 ± 0.29 mm (range 7.5-8.50 mm). The recipient cut roundness was 0.922 ± 0.070, varying from 0.78 to 1.0. The roundness of the corneoscleral limbus (0.874 ± 0.074) which represented the shape of recipient cornea was the main predictor of the configuration of recipient cut (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). Other preoperative characteristics investigated were mean keratometry (P = 0.63), keratometric astigmatism (P = 0.18), central corneal thickness (P = 0.64), keratoconus severity (P = 0.37), and trephine size (P = 0.50) that demonstrated no significant associations with the roundness of cut.
CONCLUSIONS: The recipient corneal cut after mechanical trephination may not be circular. The roundness of recipient bed was primarily affected by the roundness of corneoscleral limbus, indicating that the shape of recipient cut tends to follow the original shape of the cornea.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; Hessburg-Barron suction trephine; Mechanical trephination; Recipient corneal cut; Roundness

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30968329     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01103-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  22 in total

1.  Manual suction versus femtosecond laser trephination for penetrating keratoplasty: intraocular pressure, endothelial cell damage, incision geometry, and wound healing responses.

Authors:  Romesh I Angunawela; Andri Riau; Shyam S Chaurasia; Donald T Tan; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  The anatomy of the limbus.

Authors:  E M Van Buskirk
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Clinical outcomes following penetrating keratoplasty using the Barron-Hessburg and Hanna corneal trephination systems.

Authors:  G A Wilbanks; S Cohen; M Chipman; D S Rootman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Penetrating keratoplasty with donor and recipient corneas of the same diameter.

Authors:  L Spadea; G Bianco; M C Mastrofini; E Balestrazzi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  1996-06

5.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus: big-bubble technique.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Hossein Jamali; Firooz Mirbabaee
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Geometric Properties of Donor Corneas After Mechanical Trephination in Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Ali Masoudi; Behrouz Rahimi; Farid Karimian; Mohammad Ali Javadi
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Astigmatic considerations in corneal graft.

Authors:  R C Troutman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1979-05

8.  Comparison of Hanna and Hessburg-Barron trephine and punch systems using histological, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and elliptical curve fitting models.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Charles M Calvo; Krista I Kinard; Lloyd B Williams; Shameema Sikder; Marcus C Neuffer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-12

9.  Radiosensitivity in breast cancer assessed by the histone γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci.

Authors:  Cholpon S Djuzenova; Ines Elsner; Astrid Katzer; Eike Worschech; Luitpold V Distel; Michael Flentje; Bülent Polat
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  An athymic rat model of cutaneous radiation injury designed to study human tissue-based wound therapy.

Authors:  Lucas H Rifkin; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Collin H Stewart; Kwang H Song; Michael C Maxted; Marcus H Bell; Natalie S Kashefi; Michael P Speiser; Michel Saint-Cyr; Michael D Story; Rod J Rohrich; Spencer A Brown; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.