| Literature DB >> 30967301 |
Suheda Gozaydinoglu1, Zeynep Hosbay2, Hayati Durmaz3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess mutual associations of body image perception, compliance with the prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees.Entities:
Keywords: Body image; Cognitive performance; Prosthetics; TAPES; Transfemoral amputation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30967301 PMCID: PMC6599412 DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc ISSN: 1017-995X Impact factor: 1.511
Study cohort characteristics.
| Total patients included | ||
| Male | 30 | |
| Female | 10 | |
| Age (years) | ||
| Mean | 37 | |
| SD | 9.9 | |
| Range | 18–50 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||
| Mean | 25 | |
| SD | 3.4 | |
| Range | 18.8–31.6 | |
| Time since amputation (years) | ||
| Mean | 12.7 | |
| SD | 9.4 | |
| Range | 1–36 | |
| Time spent with prosthesis within day (hours) | ||
| Mean | 11.4 | |
| SD | 2.8 | |
| Range | 5–18 | |
| Amputation etiology (# of patients) | ||
| Traffic accident | 25 | |
| Industrial accident | 9 | |
| Gunshot injuries | 6 | |
Abbreviations: SD, Standard deviation; BMI, Body Mass Index.
Study cohort ABIS, TAPES and cognitive performance scores (n = 40).
| Assessments parameters | Mean (SD) | Min. | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50.6 (16.6) | 28 | 81 | |
| Psychosocial adjustment | 54.7 (12.7) | 35 | 73 |
| Activity restriction | 20.4 (3.7) | 14 | 28 |
| Prosthesis satisfaction | 35.5 (7.3) | 23 | 46 |
| MoCA | 25.3 (3.0) | 18 | 29 |
| Serial subtraction | 5.8 (3.7) | 1 | 14 |
| Verbal fluency test | |||
| K | 10 (3.2) | 5 | 17 |
| S | 9.2 (3.3) | 4 | 15 |
| B | 9.5 (3.4) | 4 | 15 |
| Category test | 11 (3.3) | 6 | 18 |
Abbreviations: ABIS, The Amputee Body Image Scale; TAPES, The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales; MoCA, The Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
Mean correct number during 7 subtraction test.
Mean number of words identified across verbal fluency test.
Mean number of words identified within a category test in 1 minute.
The relationship between ABIS and cognitive performance scores.
| ABIS | ||
|---|---|---|
| r | p-value | |
| MoCA | −0.514 | 0.000* |
| Serial subtraction test | −0.367 | 0.002* |
| Verbal fluency test | ||
| K | −0.487 | 0.000* |
| S | −0.454 | 0.000* |
| B | −0.424 | 0.000* |
| Category test | −0.471 | 0.000* |
All data are expressed by p value. *p < 0.05.
Abbreviations: MoCA, The Montreal Cognitive Assessment; ABIS, The Amputee Body Image Scale.
The relationship between TAPES and cognitive performance.
| TAPES | n = 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| r | p-value | |
| Psychosocial adjustment- MoCA | 0.550 | 0.000* |
| serial subtraction test | 0.323 | 0.005* |
| verbal fluency test | ||
| K | 0.401 | 0.001* |
| S | 0.346 | 0.003* |
| B | 0.341 | 0.003* |
| category test | 0.288 | 0.013* |
| Activity restriction- MoCA | −0.512 | 0.000* |
| serial subtraction test | −0.378 | 0.001* |
| verbal fluency test | ||
| K | −0.401 | 0.001* |
| S | −0.356 | 0.003* |
| B | −0.381 | 0.001* |
| category test | −0.481 | 0.000* |
| Prosthesis satisfaction- MoCA | 0.550 | 0.000* |
| serial subtraction test | 0.241 | 0.042* |
| verbal fluency test | ||
| K | 0.389 | 0.001* |
| S | 0.365 | 0.002* |
| B | 0.441 | 0.000* |
| category test | 0.332 | 0.005* |
The relationship between TAPES and cognitive performance.
All data are expressed by p value. *p < 0.05.