| Literature DB >> 30966150 |
Yongxu Du1, Dong Li2, Libin Liu3, Guangjie Gai4.
Abstract
Self-healing materials have attracted much attention because that they possess the ability to increase the lifetime of materials and reduce the total cost of systems during the process of long-term use; incorporation of functional material enlarges their applications. Graphene, as a promising additive, has received great attention due to its large specific surface area, ultrahigh conductivity, strong antioxidant characteristics, thermal stability, high thermal conductivity, and good mechanical properties. In this brief review, graphene-containing polymer composites with self-healing properties are summarized including their preparations, self-healing conditions, properties, and applications. In addition, future perspectives of graphene/polymer composites are briefly discussed.Entities:
Keywords: composite; graphene; polymer; self-healing
Year: 2018 PMID: 30966150 PMCID: PMC6415098 DOI: 10.3390/polym10020114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Applications of self-healing graphene/polymer composites.
Figure 2Remote, spatiotemporal, light-fueled modulation of the mechanical properties of co-assembled PG-DAT/PG-CA films hybridized with TRGO. The incorporation of TRGO in low amounts (0.1 wt %) allows localized heating via a NIR laser (808 nm) to break the hydrogen bonds, thus allowing molecular motion and relaxation. Reproduced with permission from [37]. Copyright (2017) Advanced Functional Materials.
Figure 3A proposed structure illustration of GO/hydrophobically associated polyacrylamide (HAPAM) composite hydrogels. Reproduced with permission from [49]. Copyright (2015) Journal of Materials Chemistry A.
Figure 4(a) Synthesis of a hyperbranched PU/IORGO nanocomposite. Reproduced with permission from [59]. Copyright (2015) New Journal of Chemistry. (b) Modification of graphene oxide (GO) by phenyl isocyanate. (c) Overall reaction scheme to prepare a PU/MG nanocomposite. Reproduced with permission from [62]. Copyright (2013) European Polymer Journal.
Figure 5Synthetic routes of nanocomposites. Reproduced with permission from [67]. Copyright (2017) Polymer.
Figure 6(a) Preparation process of the self-healing anticorrosion coating. Reproduced with permission from [75]. Copyright (2015) ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces. (b) The chemical structures of bPEI-Fc, PAA and RGO-CD. (c) Schematic illustration of the fabrication and healing process of the PAA/bPEI-Fc&RGO-CD composite films. Reproduced with permission from [77]. Copyright (2017) ACS Nano.
Figure 7Illustration of the self-healing process of FGNS-PU-DA nanocomposite. Reproduced with permission from [68]. Copyright (2017) ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces.
Figure 8Self-healing properties of hydrogels. A pristine cylinder of the sample was cut in half (a). The two-halves were simply brought into contact, and a drop of water was dropped on the cut surface (b). After standing for 24 h, the sample can be stretched to a large strain by hand (c). Reproduced with permission from [46]. Copyright (2017) ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces. Photos of the self-healing hydrogel: (d) as-prepared; (e) cut sample; (f) contacted and immersed in FeCl3/HCl; (g) stretched to ≈600% after immersing in FeCl3/HCl for 5 h; (h) loaded with ≈5.5 kg after healing for 15 h; (i) the healing surface and broken surface after tensile test of the hydrogel healed for 15 h. Reproduced with permission from [47]. Copyright (2016) Macromolecular Materials and Engineering.
Figure 9Strain-stress curves of the self-healing composites with GO at (a) 1 wt %, (b) 2 wt % and (c) 4 wt % (termed HBN-1% GO, HBN-2% GO, HBN-4% GO, respectively) upon different healing time at room temperature; (d) Strain-stress curves of the HBN-2% GO samples of 10 min healing at different waiting time. The waiting was performed at approx. 0% relative humidity from [99]. Copyright (2013) Advanced Materials.
Figure 10The graphene-thermoplastic PU composites were healed by IR light, electricity and electromagnetic waves with high healing efficiencies. Reproduced with permission from [91]. Copyright (2013) Advanced Materials.
Figure 11(a) Tensile stress–strain curves, and (b) elastic modulus and fracture dissipated energy of a PAM/GO single network (SN) gel, agar-PAM DN gel, and agar-PAM/GO DN gel. (c) Loading–unloading cyclic tensile stress–stain curves at a maximal strain of 1000%, and (d) corresponding dissipated energy of three gels. (e) Photos of the stretching process of agar-PAM/GO DN gel (from i to iii). Reproduced with permission from [48]. Copyright (2016) Advanced Engineering Materials.
Figure 12(a) The shape memory behavior of an unfolded cube box (10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm) (top). Photographs demonstrating the shape memory behavior of the unfolded cube box in different times (bottom). Scale = 10 mm. Reproduced with permission from [80]. Copyright (2013) Macromolecular Rapid Communications. Electrically activated shape recovery ratio as a function of time under various triggering voltages for (b) PVAc/Gr3 and (c) PVAc/Gr4.5. The inset shows the sample geometry. Reproduced with permission from [41]. Copyright (2016) Society of Chemical Industry.
Figure 13Electrochemical measurements and application for as-prepared stretchable and self-healing supercapacitors. (a) Photographs, (b) cyclic voltammogram curves, and (c) evolutions of specific capacitance of the supercapacitor before and after stretching to 100%. (d) Cyclic voltammogram curves, (e) galvonostatic charge−discharge measurements, and (f) Nyquist plots of the supercapacitor before healing and after self-healing cycles. (g) Illustration of the supercapacitor driving a photodetector of perovskite nanowires. (h) Photographs of the supercapacitor before and after self-healing. (i) Photocurrent dependence on time of the photodetector under illumination of on/off states driven by the original and self-healing supercapacitor after a healing cycle; red corresponds to the self-healing supercapacitor and black to the original. Reproduced with permission from [39]. Copyright (2017) ACS Nano. (j) Fabricated supercapacitor temperature dependence of cyclic voltammetry profiles at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1. The arrow indicates the direction of increasing temperatures. (k) Galvanostatic charging–discharging profiles at a current density of 1 A g−1. The inset indicates calculated specific capacitance with respect to temperature change. Reproduced with permission from [104]. Copyright (2017) Scientific Reports.
Figure 14Schematic and images of (a) neat PU coating and (b) GOMCs/PU coatings subjected to the salt spray test for 116 h. Schematic and images of (c) neat PU coating and (d) GOMCs/PU coatings after scratching and 15 days of healing, subjected to the salt spray test for 43 h. Inset: the enlarged view of the white block. Reproduced with permission from [36]. Copyright (2016) Composites Science and Technology.
Figure 15(a) Cumulate CPT release of hydrogels in PBS. Reproduced with permission from [53]. Copyright (2014) Materials Technology Advanced Performance Materials. The hydrogel as intramuscular electrodes. (b) Three hydrogel electrodes implanted into the dorsal muscle and the wires from the electrodes were transcutaneously connected to the signal detector. (c) Photos of the hydrogel implantation. (d) Example of the electromyographic signal recorded by the implanted hydrogel electrodes from the muscle when the rabbit was interfered by external stimulation. Reproduced with permission from [102]. Copyright (2016) Small.
The properties of various self-healing graphene/polymers composites.
| Materials | Self-Healing Mechanisms | Self-Healing Condition | Self-Healing Efficiency | Original Mechanical Property | Applications | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG/TPU material | PU chains diffuse | IR light, Electricity, Microwave (2.45 GHz) | 98% of electrical conductivity | Tensile strength 40 MPa | Transport industries, construction industries, electronics | [ |
| P(AM- | Hydrogen bonds, electrostatic interaction | Drop water | >92% of tensile strength, >99% of tensile strain and >93% of toughness | Young’s modulus 1 MPa Tensile strength 2 MPa | - | [ |
| Chitosan/GO Hydrogel | π-π stacking, hydrogen bonds | Contact (room temperature) | - | Adhesive strength 1 MPa compressive stress 14 KPa | Electroactive tissue engineering applications | [ |
| PU-DA-mGO | Dynamic covalent bonds | Heating (120 °C after 10 min) | 90% of tensile strength | Stress 38 MPa | Aerospace, automobile, coating, electronics, energy, etc. | [ |
| Graphene/PU | Diels-Alder chemistry | IR | 96% of tensile strength | Breaking strength 36 MPa Young’s modulus 127 MPa | Flexible electronics | [ |
| PVAc/graphene nanocomposites | Diffusion of the polymer chains | 60 °C for 1 h | 89% (mechanical properties) | - | Sensors and fast deployable and actuating devices | [ |
| RFGO/PU composites | Diels–Alder chemistry | Microwaves | 93% (mechanical properties) | Stress 24 MPa Young’s module 52 MPa | Flexible conductors, strain sensors | [ |
| PAA-GO-Fe3+ Hydrogel | Ionic binding | Contact and immersed in FeCl3/HCl | Nearly 100% tensile | Tensile strength 2.5 MPa Elongation 700% | Soft actuators, robots | [ |
| PDA-pGO-PAM hydrogel | Non-covalent bonds | Contact | 60% of tensile strength 95% of electrical conductivity | Tensile strength 75 kPa | Bioelectronics | [ |
| PAM/GO DN gel | Hydrogen bond | Heating 80 °C for 3 h | 48% of tensile strength | Elongation 4600% Fracture strength 332 kPa | Engineering fields | [ |
| Au@PCLx/rGO/Ag | Fibers soften and flow | Light irradiation (532 nm) | 90% of tensile strength 91% of conductivity | Tensile strength 4.85 MPa | Optoelectronic devices | [ |
| SR/GNP composite | Reversible bonds | Thermal annealing | 87% of tensile strength | Stress 1.3 MPa | Seals, hoses and automotive sector | [ |
| HPU-IO-RGO | Diffusion of the polymer chains | Microwave sunlight | 99% | Tensile strength 24.15 MPa Tensile modulus 28.55 MPa Toughness 110.8 MJ m3 | Transport, construction, electronics | [ |
| GO-Clay-PDMAA Hybrid Hydrogels | Diffusion of the polymer chains hydrogen bonds | NIR | 96% (mechanical strength) | Strength 184 kPa Elongation 1890% | Surgical dressing | [ |
| GO/PU composites | Covalent bonding | Heating | 78% of tensile stress | Tensile modulus 21.95 MPa Fracture stress 8 MPa Young’s modulus 22 MPa | Smart materials and structural material | [ |
| SHPU/grapheme composites | Interchain diffusion | NIR | 39% | Stress 4 MPa | Functional polymer | [ |
| GO/PAA composite hydrogels | Diffusion of polymer chains hydrogen bond | Contact at different temperatures | 88% (mechanical properties) | Tensile strength 0.35 MPa Elongation 4900% (healed) | Biomedical and engineering fields | [ |