| Literature DB >> 30966025 |
Ke-Chang Hung1, Heng Yeh2, Teng-Chun Yang3, Tung-Lin Wu4, Jin-Wei Xu5, Jyh-Horng Wu6.
Abstract
In this study, four kinds of lignocellulosic fibers (LFs), namely, those from Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata), Taiwan red pine (Pinus taiwanensis), India-charcoal trema (Trema orientalis) and makino bamboo (Phyllostachys makinoi), were selected as reinforcements and incorporated into high-density polyethylene (HDPE) to manufacture wood-plastic composites (WPCs) by a flat platen pressing process. In addition to comparing the differences in the physico-mechanical properties of these composites, their chemical compositions were evaluated and their thermal decomposition kinetics were analyzed to investigate the effects of the lignocellulosic species on the properties of the WPCs. The results showed that the WPC made with Chinese fir displayed a typical M-shaped vertical density profile due to the high aspect ratio of its LFs, while a flat vertical density profile was observed for the WPCs made with other LFs. Thus, the WPC made with Chinese fir exhibited higher flexural properties and lower internal bond strength (IB) than other WPCs. In addition, the Taiwan red pine contained the lowest holocellulose content and the highest extractives and α-cellulose contents, which gave the resulting WPC lower water absorption and flexural properties. On the other hand, consistent with the flexural properties, the results of thermal decomposition kinetic analysis showed that the activation energy of the LFs at 10% of the conversion rate increased in the order of Taiwan red pine (146⁻161 kJ/mol), makino bamboo (158⁻175 kJ/mol), India-charcoal trema (185⁻194 kJ/mol) and Chinese fir (194⁻202 kJ/mol). These results indicate that the morphology, chemical composition and thermal stability of the LFs can have a substantial impact on the physico-mechanical properties of the resulting WPCs.Entities:
Keywords: apparent activation energy; lignocellulosic fibers; physico-mechanical properties; thermal decomposition kinetic; wood-plastic composites
Year: 2017 PMID: 30966025 PMCID: PMC6418917 DOI: 10.3390/polym9120726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Micrographs of different lignocellulosic fibers: (a) makino bamboo; (b) India-charcoal trema; (c) Taiwan red pine; and (d) Chinese fir.
Morphology and chemical composition of different lignocellulosic fibers.
| Characteristics of Lignocellulosic Fiber | Lignocellulosic Materials | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Makino Bamboo | India-Charcoal Trema | Taiwan Red Pine | Chinese Fir | |
| Morphology | ||||
| Length (mm) | 3.1 ± 0.9 A | 2.0 ± 0.4 C | 2.5 ± 0.7 B | 3.2 ± 0.8 A |
| Width (mm) | 0.8 ± 0.3 A | 0.7 ± 0.2 A | 0.8 ± 0.2 A | 0.6 ± 0.2 B |
| Aspect ratio | 4.4 ± 1.8 B | 2.9 ± 1.3 C | 3.3 ± 1.5 C | 6.3 ± 2.7 A |
| Chemical composition | ||||
| Holocellulose (%) | 71.0 ± 0.8 B | 73.7 ± 0.2 A | 61.0 ± 1.3 D | 66.4 ± 0.3 C |
| α-Cellulose (%) | 43.7 ± 0.4 A | 42.6 ± 0.9 A | 37.7 ± 1.1 B | 45.1 ± 1.0 A |
| Lignin (%) | 20.9 ± 3.8 B | 25.4 ± 3.1 B | 28.3 ± 0.9 B | 37.1 ± 1.5 A |
| Extractives (%) | 4.0 ± 0.2 B | 4.4 ± 0.2 B | 11.7 ± 0.3 A | 4.0 ± 0.1 B |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 5). Different letters within a row indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
The physical properties of WPCs made with different lignocellulosic fibers.
| Lignocellulosic Materials | Density (kg/m3) | Moisture Content (%) | 24 h Soaking | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water Absorption (%) | Thickness Swelling (%) | |||
| Makino bamboo | 911 ± 17 A | 4.5 ± 0.2 A | 12.2 ± 1.5 B | 4.1 ± 0.3 B |
| India-charcoal trema | 904 ± 15 A | 4.3 ± 0.2 A | 9.0 ± 1.7 BC | 4.5 ± 0.3 B |
| Taiwan red pine | 914 ± 12 A | 4.4 ± 0.2 A | 7.3 ± 1.2 C | 3.6 ± 0.8 B |
| Chinese fir | 915 ± 21 A | 4.3 ± 0.1 A | 15.4 ± 2.1 A | 6.8 ± 0.8 A |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 5). A,B,C Different letters in superscript indicate significant difference among groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 2The vertical density profiles of WPCs made with makino bamboo (a); India-charcoal trema (b); Taiwan red pine (c); and Chinese fir (d).
Figure 3The MOR (a); MOE (b); internal bond strength (IB) (c); and wood screw holding strength (WS) (d) of WPCs made with different lignocellulosic fibers. *: IB over the test limitation (2 MPa). Values are the mean ± SD (n = 5). Different letters indicate significant differences among groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Thermogravimetric analysis of various lignocellulosic materials at a heating rate of 20 °C/min.
Figure 5Typical isoconversional plots using the Friedman method (a); Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method (b); and Modified Coats-Redfern method (c) for Chinese fir.
Figure 6A comparison of apparent activation energies as a function of decomposition conversion rate (α) for various lignocellulosic fibers calculated by the Friedman method (a); Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method (b); and modified Coast-Redfern method (c).
Apparent activation energy of different lignocellulosic fibers calculated by three isoconversional methods at the α = 10%.
| Lignocellulosic Materials | Friedman | F-W-O | Modified C-R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Makino bamboo | 175 | 0.9890 | 168 | 0.9895 | 158 | 0.9870 |
| India-charcoal trema | 190 | 0.9984 | 194 | 0.9958 | 185 | 0.9949 |
| Taiwan red pine | 161 | 0.9941 | 156 | 0.9836 | 146 | 0.9794 |
| Chinese fir | 199 | 0.9955 | 202 | 0.9931 | 194 | 0.9917 |