| Literature DB >> 28772751 |
Ke-Chang Hung1, Chen-Ning Yang2, Teng-Chun Yang3, Tung-Lin Wu4, Yong-Long Chen5, Jyh-Horng Wu6.
Abstract
This study was compared and characterized two different alkali (potassium carbonate (PC) andEntities:
Keywords: acetylation; apparent activation energy; slicewood; thermal decomposition kinetic; vinyl acetate
Year: 2017 PMID: 28772751 PMCID: PMC5506890 DOI: 10.3390/ma10040393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(A) The weight percent gain (WPG) of vinyl acetate (VA)-acetylated slicewood reacted at 78 °C and 140 °C as a function of reaction time. Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 9); (B) Effect of potassium carbonate content on the WPG of VA-acetylated slicewood by the reaction at 140 °C for 6 h.
The weight percent gain (WPG), modulus of elasticity (MOE), and modulus of rupture (MOR) of vinyl acetate (VA)-acetylated slicewood with two different catalysts by the reaction at 140 °C for 0–24 h.
| Reaction Time (h) | Potassium Carbonate (5%) | Potassium Acetate (5%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG (%) | MOE (GPa) | MOR (MPa) | WPG (%) | MOE (GPa) | MOR (MPa) | |
| Control | − | 6.5 ± 0.4 a | 79 ± 14 a | − | 6.5 ± 0.4 a | 79 ± 14 a |
| 0 | −1.4 ± 0.4 e | 6.6 ± 1.3 a | 91 ± 18 a | −3.5 ± 1.1 e | 6.9 ± 1.0 a | 100 ± 20 a |
| 0.5 | 0.9 ± 1.3 d | 5.8 ± 0.6 a | 80 ± 2 a | −0.7 ± 0.8 d | 6.1 ± 1.1 a | 78 ± 18 a |
| 1 | 4.4 ± 1.6 c | 5.8 ± 0.9 a | 80 ± 14 a | 0.2 ± 0.8 d | 6.5 ± 0.9 a | 105 ± 17 a |
| 3 | 9.0 ± 1.2 b | 5.6 ± 0.6 a | 94 ± 33 a | 3.6 ± 1.3 c | 5.1 ± 2.5 a | 70 ± 33 a |
| 6 | 11.3 ± 1.2 a | 6.7 ± 1.2 a | 89 ± 24 a | 9.4 ± 1.1 b | 5.1 ± 1.3 a | 78 ± 13 a |
| 24 | 13.4 ± 1.9 a | 5.5 ± 0.8 a | 76 ± 20 a | 12.9 ± 1.1 a | 6.6 ± 1.4 a | 88 ± 23 a |
Values are the means ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 9). Different superscript letters within a column indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 2The attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectra of VA-acetylated slicewood with potassium carbonate (PC) (A) and potassium acetate (PA) (B) as a catalyst at various reaction time.
Figure 3The correlations between the intensity of I1736 cm−1/I898 cm−1 and WPG of acetic anhydride (AA)-acetylated slicewood (A) and between the WPG and calibrated WPG (cWPG) of VA-acetylated slicewood (B) by vapor phase reaction for 6 h.
Figure 4Solid state carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (13C-NMR) spectra of unmodified slicewood (A), AA-acetylated slicewood (WPG 21%) (B), and VA-acetylated slicewood (cWPG 18%) with PC (C) and PA (D).
Figure 5The storage modulus (E′) retention ratio (A) and loss modulus (E″) (B) of unmodified slicewood, AA-acetylated slicewood (WPG 21%), and VA-acetylated slicewood (cWPG 18%) with PC and PA.
Figure 6Thermogravimetric curves of unmodified slicewood, AA-acetylated slicewood (WPG 18%), and VA-acetylated slicewood (cWPG 18%) with PC and PA.
Figure 7Typical iso-conversional plots of Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (F-W-O) (A); modified Coats-Redfern (C-R) (B); Friedman (C); and Starink (D) methods for unmodified slicewood.
Apparent activation energy and reaction order of unmodified slicewood, acetic anhydride (AA)-acetylated slicewood (WPG 18%), and vinyl acetate (VA)-acetylated slicewood (cWPG 18%) with potassium carbonate (PC) and potassium acetate (PA) calculated by the methods of Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (F-W-O), modified Coats-Redfern (C-R), Friedman, Starink, and Avrami.
| Slicewood | Methods | Units | Conversion Rates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | 50% | 60% | 70% | Mean | |||
| Unmodified | F-W-O | 170 | 172 | 175 | 178 | 177 | 176 | 177 | 175 | |
| (Control) | 0.994 | 0.992 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.996 | 0.996 | 0.996 | – | ||
| Modified C-R | 169 | 171 | 174 | 176 | 176 | 175 | 175 | 174 | ||
| 0.993 | 0.991 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.996 | 0.996 | 0.995 | – | |||
| Friedman | 183 | 198 | 180 | 174 | 193 | 183 | 172 | 183 | ||
| 0.999 | 0.978 | 0.989 | 0.998 | 0.984 | 0.996 | 0.996 | – | |||
| Starink | 170 | 172 | 175 | 177 | 176 | 175 | 176 | 174 | ||
| 0.993 | 0.991 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.996 | 0.996 | 0.996 | – | |||
| Avrami | Reac. order | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.43 | |
| 0.984 | 0.992 | 0.992 | 0.996 | 0.997 | 0.999 | ≈1 | – | |||
| AA-acetylated | F-W-O | 182 | 191 | 198 | 202 | 201 | 199 | 199 | 196 | |
| 0.999 | ≈1 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | ≈1 | ≈1 | – | |||
| Modified C-R | 181 | 190 | 197 | 202 | 200 | 198 | 199 | 195 | ||
| 0.999 | ≈1 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | ≈1 | 0.999 | – | |||
| Friedman | 201 | 232 | 205 | 229 | 191 | 192 | 206 | 208 | ||
| 0.980 | 0.980 | 0.997 | 0.992 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.997 | – | |||
| Starink | 182 | 191 | 198 | 202 | 201 | 198 | 199 | 196 | ||
| 0.999 | ≈1 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | ≈1 | 0.999 | – | |||
| Avrami | Reac. order | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.54 | |
| 0.997 | 0.998 | 0.998 | 0.999 | ≈1 | 0.997 | 0.994 | – | |||
| VA-acetylated | F-W-O | 175 | 186 | 194 | 201 | 202 | 201 | 203 | 195 | |
| (PC) | 0.988 | 0.998 | 0.999 | ≈1 | ≈1 | ≈1 | ≈1 | – | ||
| Modified C-R | 174 | 186 | 194 | 201 | 202 | 201 | 203 | 194 | ||
| 0.987 | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.999 | ≈1 | ≈1 | ≈1 | – | |||
| Friedman | 172 | 206 | 202 | 196 | 205 | 206 | 213 | 200 | ||
| 0.980 | 0.995 | 0.996 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.996 | 0.999 | – | |||
| Starink | 175 | 186 | 194 | 201 | 202 | 201 | 203 | 195 | ||
| 0.987 | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.999 | ≈1 | ≈1 | ≈1 | – | |||
| Avrami | Reac. order | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.55 | |
| 0.926 | 0.989 | 0.996 | 0.998 | 0.998 | 0.997 | 0.996 | – | |||
| VA-acetylated | F-W-O | 163 | 173 | 183 | 189 | 194 | 193 | 194 | 184 | |
| (PA) | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.996 | 0.996 | 0.994 | – | ||
| Modified C-R | 161 | 172 | 182 | 189 | 194 | 193 | 193 | 183 | ||
| 0.995 | 0.994 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.993 | – | |||
| Friedman | 157 | 170 | 200 | 193 | 195 | 186 | 201 | 186 | ||
| 0.987 | 0.989 | 0.997 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.991 | 0.991 | – | |||
| Starink | 162 | 172 | 182 | 189 | 194 | 193 | 193 | 184 | ||
| 0.995 | 0.994 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.994 | – | |||
| Avrami | Reac. order | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.57 | |
| 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.996 | 0.996 | 0.996 | 0.995 | 0.992 | – | |||
Figure 8Regression lines to reaction order proposed by Avrami theory for unmodified slicewood (A); AA-acetylated slicewood (WPG 18%) (B); and VA-acetylated slicewood (cWPG 18%) with PC (C) and PA (D).