| Literature DB >> 30965822 |
Hajime Nakajima1, Peter Dijkstra2, Katja Loos3.
Abstract
The main motivation for development of biobased polymers was their biodegradability, which is becoming important due to strong public concern about waste. Reflecting recent changes in the polymer industry, the sustainability of biobased polymers allows them to be used for general and engineering applications. This expansion is driven by the remarkable progress in the processes for refining biomass feedstocks to produce biobased building blocks that allow biobased polymers to have more versatile and adaptable polymer chemical structures and to achieve target properties and functionalities. In this review, biobased polymers are categorized as those that are: (1) upgrades from biodegradable polylactides (PLA), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), and others; (2) analogous to petroleum-derived polymers such as bio-poly(ethylene terephthalate) (bio-PET); and (3) new biobased polymers such as poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF). The recent developments and progresses concerning biobased polymers are described, and important technical aspects of those polymers are introduced. Additionally, the recent scientific achievements regarding high-spec engineering-grade biobased polymers are presented.Entities:
Keywords: bio-poly(ethylene terephthalate) (bio-PET); biobased polyamides; biobased polymers; biodegradable polymers; modified lactide; poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF); poly(hydroxy alkanoates) (PHAs); polylactides (PLA); polyterpenes; succinate polymers
Year: 2017 PMID: 30965822 PMCID: PMC6418730 DOI: 10.3390/polym9100523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Development of biobased polymers and comparison with petroleum-derived polymers.
| Petroleum-derived polymers | Biobased polymers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial approach | Scientific approach | |
| Super-engineering applications | since 1960 | not yet | since 2010 |
| PEEK, PSU, PES, PPS, PEI, PAI, LCP | bio-LCP, bio-PEEK (new generation) | ||
| Engineering/semi-engineering applications | since 1950 | since 2010 | since 2000 |
| Polyamide, POM, PC, PPO, PET, PTT, PBT, ultra-high MW PE, HIPS | bio-PET, bio-PTT, bio-PBT, bio-polyamide (analogous to petroleum-derived ones) | polyterpenes, PEF, bio-polyamide, sc-PLA (high | |
| General applications | since 1930 | since 2000 | since 1990 |
| PE, PP, PS, PMMA, PVC, ABS | PLLA (high- | sc-PLA (low | |
| Biodegradable/biocompatible applications | since 1970 | since 1990 | since 1970 |
| PCL, PEG | PLLA (low- | PLA, PHAs, succinate polymers | |
Poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) crystallization parameters [23].
| Approximate value of growth rate of spherulite (μm/min) 1 | Crystallinity (%) 5 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99.75 | 1.39 | 5.2 | 0.97 | 3.02 | 8.12 | 37.8 |
| 98.82 | 1.55 | 4.2 | 2.47 | 8.04 | 16.48 | 31.9 |
| 97.79 | 1.42 | 2.4 | 5.19 | 14.2 | 28.69 | 23.7 |
1 From analysis performed using polarized optical microscopy for isothermal crystallization at 130 °C (Approximate values from plot of Figure 2 in Reference [23]); 2 starting time of crystallization at 110 °C; 3 half-crystallization time at 110 °C; 4 ending time of crystallization at 110 °C; 5 Crystallinity after completion of crystallization at 110 °C.
IR frequencies of amorphous, α’-form, and α-form PLLA [29].
| Amorphous (cm−1) | α’-Form (cm−1) | α-Form (cm−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| νas (CH3) | 2995 | 2997 | 2997 |
| 3006 | |||
| νs (CH3) | 2945 | 2946 | 2946 |
| 2964 | |||
| ν (C=O) | 1757 | 1761 | 1759 |
| 1749 | |||
| δas (CH3) | 1454 | 1457 | 1457 |
| 1444 | |||
| δs (CH3) | 1387 | 1386 | 1386 |
| 1382 |
Figure 1Chemical structures and conformation of PLA: (a) chemical structures and chirality; (b) conformation of PLLA (homo-chiral) [33]; and (c) conformation of sc-PLA from a combination of PLLA and PDLA [34].
Properties of commercial-grade Ingeo PLA [9].
| Ingeo type | Application | MFR (g/10 min, 210 °C/2.16 kg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003D | extrusion, injection | 6 | 145–160 | 55–60 |
| 3001D | 22 | 155–170 | 55–60 | |
| 3251D | 80 | 155–170 | 55–60 | |
| 3801X | 155–170 | 45 | ||
| 4032D | film, sheet | 7 | 155–170 | 55–60 |
| 4060D | 10 | - | 55–60 | |
| 6060D | fiber, non-woven | 8 | 122–135 | 55–60 |
| 6252D | 80 | 155–170 | 55–60 | |
| 6752D | 14 | 145–160 | 55–60 |
Figure 2Biological synthesis scheme of P3HB.
Thermal and mechanical properties of representative PHAs [45].
| P3HB | P(3HB- | P(3HB- | Poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) (P4HB) | P(3HB- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 177 | 145 | 61 | 60 | 152 | |
| 4 | −1 | −35 | −50 | −8 | |
| Tensile (MPa) | 40 | 32 | 9 | 104 | 26 |
| Elongation at break (%) | 6 | 50 | 380 | 1000 | 444 |
Figure 3Chemical structures of PHAs.
Figure 4Chemical structure of cellulose and starch.
Figure 5Chemical structures of succinate polymers.
Figure 6Proposed methods to achieve biobased TPA: (a) the iso-butanol method [67]; (b) the muconic acid method [68]; (c) the limonene method [69]; and (d) the furfural method [70,71,72,73].
Chemical structures, suppliers, Tm, and moduli of biobased polyamides [77,78,79].
| Source | Chemical structure | Examples of commercial suppliers | Modulus (GPa) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biobased | Polyamide 4 | N.A. | 265 | |
| Polyamide 4.6 | DSM | 295 | ||
| Polyamide 4.10 | DSM | 250 | 1.3 | |
| Polyamide 6.10 | Evonik | 206 | 2.1 | |
| Polyamide 10.10 | Arkema, Evonik | 191 | 1.8 | |
| Polyamide 11 | Arkema | 185 | 1.0 | |
| Polyamide 12 | Evonik | 178 | 1.6 | |
| Petroleum derived | Polyamide 6 | Chemical companies | 218 | 3.0 |
| Polyamide 6.6 | Chemical companies | 258 | 2.5 |
Figure 7Method of building block production and biobased polyamide polymerization: (a) biobased polyamides from sugar; (b) from castor oil [78].
Figure 8Avantium’s PEF production process [87].
Comparison of the physical properties of PEF and PET [88].
| PEF | PET | |
|---|---|---|
| Density (g/cm3) | 1.43 | 1.36 |
| O2 permeability | 0.0107 | 0.114 |
| CO2 permeability | 0.026 | 0.46 |
| 88 | 76 | |
| 210–230 | 250–270 | |
| E-modulus (GPa) | 3.1–3.3 | 2.1–2.2 |
| Yield stress (MPa) | 90–100 | 50–60 |
| Quiescent crystallization time (min) | 20–30 | 2–3 |
Figure 9Synthetic scheme of cyclic oligomers for PEF and PBF [98,99].
Figure 10(a) Phenyl-substituted PLA; and (b) high-Tg polymer produced from norbornene-substituted lactide.
Chemical structure of modified lactides and their Tg values [100,101,102,103,104].
| Modified lactide | |
|---|---|
| Glycolide | 40 |
| methyl glycolide(lactide) | 66 |
| ethylglycolide | 15 |
| hexyl glycolide | −37 |
| isobutyl glycolide | 22 |
| cyclohexyl glycolide (meso) | 96 |
| cyclohexyl glycolide (iso) | 104 |
| meso-mandelide | 100 |
| Norbornene | 192 |
Figure 11Production of polyterpenes from β-pinene using: (a) cationic polymerization [105]; and (b) radical polymerization [108]; and (c) production from myrcene [115].
Polymerization process and thermal properties of polyterpenes [105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115].
| Polymerization | ||
|---|---|---|
| α-pinene | free radical | 162 |
| β-pinene | cationic | 132 |
| β-pinene | cationic | 90 |
| cationic | 130 | |
| limonene oxide | trans-carbonation | 95 |
| trans-carbonation | 114 | |
| limonene oxide/phthalic anhydride | ROP, ester | 82 |
| Myrcene/styrene | emulsion | −61 |
| myrcene(3-methylenecyclopentene) | cationic polymerization | 11 |
Figure 12Chemical structures of: (a) poly(4-hydroxycinnamic acid); (b) poly((4,4′-diyl-α-truxillic acid dimethyl ester) 4,4′-diacetamido-α-truxillamide); (c) poly(α-glucan); and (d) poly(ether-ether ketone) consisting of FDCA derivatives.