| Literature DB >> 32397628 |
Svetlana Rogovina1, Lubov Zhorina1, Andrey Gatin1, Eduard Prut1, Olga Kuznetsova1, Anastasia Yakhina1, Anatoliy Olkhov1,2, Naum Samoylov3, Maxim Grishin1, Alexey Iordanskii1, Alexandr Berlin1.
Abstract
Compositions of polylactide (PLA) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) thermoplastic polyesters originated from the nature raw have been obtained by blending under shear deformations and electrospinning methods in the form of films and nanofibers as well as unwoven nanofibrous materials, respectively. The degrees of crystallinity calculated on the base of melting enthalpies and thermal transition temperatures for glassy state, cold crystallization, and melting point for individual biopolymers and ternary polymer blends PLA-PHB- poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG) have been evaluated. It has been shown that the mechanical properties of compositions depend on the presence of plasticizers PEG with different molar masses in interval of 400-1000. The experiments on the action of mold fungi on the films have shown that PHB is a fully biodegradable polymer unlike PLA, whereas the biodegradability of the obtained composites is determined by their composition. The sorption activity of PLA-PHB nanofibers and unwoven nanofibrous PLA-PHB composites relative to water and oil has been studied and the possibility of their use as absorbents in wastewater treatment from petroleum products has been demonstrated.Entities:
Keywords: biodegradability; blending under shear deformations; electrospinning; oil absorption; poly(3-hydroxybutyrate); poly(ethyleneglycol); polylactide
Year: 2020 PMID: 32397628 PMCID: PMC7284690 DOI: 10.3390/polym12051088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of PLA (1,1′), PHB (2,2′), and their blend with PEG (PLA–PHB (80: 20 wt %) + 5 wt % PEG400) (3,3′) at the first (without prime) and second (primed) heating.
Thermophysical characteristics of initial PLA and in its blends of various compositions at the first and second heating.
| Blend Composition PLA-PGB, wt % | Heating | Tg, °C | Tm, °C | ΔHm, J/g | Tcc, °C | ∆Tccg, °C | χcr,% * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polylactide | |||||||
| PLA = 100 | first | 65.0 | doublet | 25.6 | 124.0 | 59.0 | 27.3 |
| second | 63.0 | doublet | 27.7 | 123.3 | 60.3 | 29.6 | |
| (80:20) + 5% PEG400 | first | 52.0 | doublet | 31.3 | 94.0 | 42.0 | 42.0 |
| second | − | doublet | 36.6 | 102.0 | 49.0 | ||
| (80:20) + 10% PEG400 | first | − | 157.6 | 41.3 | 83.0 | 55.0 | |
| second | − | 156.8 | 42.7 | doublet | 57.0 | ||
| (80:20) + 5% PEG600 | first | 54.2 | doublet | 22.8 | 96.0 | 42.0 | 30.0 |
| second | − | doublet | 32.4 | 106.0 | 43.0 | ||
| (80:20) +5% PEG1000 | first | 53.5 | 159.0 | 29.6 | 107.0 | 53.5 | 34.0 |
| PHB = 100 | first | - | 175.0 | 71.0 | - | 49.0 | |
| second | - | 170.0 | 75.5 | - | 52.0 | ||
* Crystallinity of individual PLA and PHB was calculated by formula , where ΔH are melting enthalpies of PLA and PHB at 100% crystallinity equal to 93.7 [38] and 146 J/g [39], respectively. Crystallinity of PLA in blends χ was calculated by formula , where W is weight fraction of PLA in blend.
Figure 2DSC curves of PLA (1), PHB (5) and PLA–PHB blends (80: 20 wt %) with 5 wt % PEG of different molar mass 400 (2), 600 (3), and 1000 (4).
Figure 3Elastic modulus E (a), tensile strength σ (b), and elongation at break ε (c) of PLA–PHB–PEG1000 compositions vs. PHB content.
Figure 4Elastic modulus E (a), tensile strength σ (b), and elongation at break ε (c) of PLA–PHB–PEG400 compositions vs. PEG content.
Influence of PEG with different molar mass on mechanical properties of PLA-PHB blends.
| Blend Composition, PLA-PHB, wt % | E, MPa | σb, MPa | εb, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80:20 + 5% PEG1000 | 2500 ± 125 | 31.6 ± 1.6 | 2 ± 0.1 |
| 80:20 + 5% PEG600 | 2700 ± 130 | 21.0 ± 1.1 | 1 ± 0.1 |
| 80:20 + 5% PEG400 | 2250 ± 110 | 25.3 ± 1.2 | 2 ± 0.1 |
Fungi resistance of samples in points depending on testing time.
| Testing Time, Days | Fungi Growth Intensity, Points | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLA | PHB | PLA-PHB | PLA-PHB | |
| 10 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 15 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 21 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 28 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
| 50 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 1-2 |
| 84 | 0-1 | 5 | 3-4 | 2 |
Figure 5Photographs of PLA–PHB composition films (80: 20 wt % + 10 wt % PEG400) before (a) and after (b) exposure in soil within 3 months.
Figure 63D Atomic Force Microscopy AMF images of fibers surfaces for PLA (1), (2) PLA–PHB (50: 50 wt %), and (3) PHB fibers at different magnification (a,b).
Oil absorption for the productive polymer absorbents.
| Absorbent | Oil Capacity, | Absorbent Condition | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDOS | 3.4 | Peat Dust Oil Sorbent | [ |
| LessorbTM | 5.6 | Dispersed powder | [ |
| PET | 14 | Nonwoven Fabric | [ |
| PHB-PLA (90:10) | 15 | Nonwoven mat | [ |
| PHB-PLA (50:50) | 16 | Nonwoven mat | [ |
| Sintapeks | 24 | Cotton-processing product | [ |
| PLA | 30 | Nonwoven mat | [ |
| PU | 37 | Foam pellets (5-8 mm) | [ |
| PHB | 45 | Nonwoven mat | [ |
| EGS | 50 | Exfoliated Graphite Sorbent | [ |