| Literature DB >> 30964091 |
Vidhu Dhawan1, Manoj Kumar1, Dipika Deka2, Neena Malhotra2, Vatsla Dadhwal2, Neeta Singh2, Rima Dada1.
Abstract
Background & objectives: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is one of the devastating complications of pregnancy and current focus lies in addressing the management of paternal factors. Dysregulation in selective transcripts delivered to oocyte at fertilization can result in pregnancy losses and adversely affect embryogenesis. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of yoga-based lifestyle intervention (YBLI) on seminal oxidative stress (OS), DNA damage and spermatozoal transcript levels.Entities:
Keywords: Dysregulation; meditation; oxidative stress; sperm DNA damage; sperm transcript; yoga
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30964091 PMCID: PMC6469372 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1988_17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Med Res ISSN: 0971-5916 Impact factor: 2.375
Details of practices done in a session of Yoga-based Lifestyle Intervention (YBLI) programme
| Practices do be done | Duration(min) |
|---|---|
| Session preparation | 5 |
| Starting prayer | 3 |
| Loosening practices | 5 |
| Sun Salutations | 10 |
| Asanas (postures) | |
| Standing | 30 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Sitting | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Prone | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Supine | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Relaxation | |
| | 5 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 20 |
| 5 | |
| Nada anusandhana (A-U-M chanting) | 5 |
| Closing prayer | 7 |
| Interactive session | 25 |
| Total | 120 |
FigureDot plot cytograms of semen samples at both baseline (day 0) and at the end of yoga-based lifestyle intervention (day 21) by sperm chromatin structure assay. FL3 on X-axis represents fragmented DNA and FL1 on Y-axis represents native DNA showing percentage of spermatozoa with high levels of DNA fragmentation. HDS represents the percentage of cells with high DNA stainability (%HDS). Each dot in the cytogram represents a single sperm with red and green fluorescence values. The debris at the bottom left corner was excluded from analysis.
Impact of lifestyle intervention on quantitative levels of various experimental parameters at baseline (day 0) and the end of active intervention (day 21)
| Experimental parameters | Baseline (day 0) | End of active intervention (day 21) |
|---|---|---|
| Sperm count (million/ml) | 38.9 (0.41-45.5) | 43.4 (1.2-149.2)** |
| Progressive motility (%) | 50 (0-65) | 55 (5-75)*** |
| ROS (RLU/sec/million sperm) | 39.4 (3.5-1223.1) | 12.5 (0.27-142)*** |
| DFI (%) | 40.2 (26.8-54.9) | 39.0 (24.34-9.8)* |
Values given as median (minimum-maximum). P<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001 compared to baseline. ROS, reactive oxygen species; RLU, relative light unit; DFI, DNA fragmentation index
Relative expression (average ΔCt) of the GOI with respect to β-actin and GAPDH in semen samples of patient as well as controls and AFC in the gene expression post-yoga with respect to pre-yoga
| GOI | ΔCt pre-yoga | ΔCt post-yoga | ΔCt controls | AFC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.6±1.8 | 4.2±0.75 | 3.9±1.1 | 0.49 | |
| 7.6±0.88 | 6.4±1.6 | 2.7±1.7 | 1.67 | |
| 5.4±0.84 | 4.8±1.09 | 3.9±2.1 | 1.3 | |
| 5.9±1.4 | 5.3±0.52 | 3.5±1.6 | 1.8 | |
| 3.3±1.3 | 3.06±1.02 | 1.9±1.1 | −0.41 | |
| 3.3±0.63 | 3.4±0.44 | 1.0±2.8 | 0.05 | |
| 2.56±0.91 | 2.21±0.63 | 1.5±1.09 | 0.74 | |
| 2.2±1.3 | 1.19±1.1 | 0.17±1.76 | 0.76 |
Values are mean±SD (n=30). GOI, genes of interest; AFC, axis fold change; FOXG1, forkhead box G1; SOX3, SRY-related HMG-box 3; RPS6, ribosomal protein S6; RBM9, RNA binding motif protein 9; RPS17, ribosomal protein S17; RPL29, ribosomal protein L29; OGG1, 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase; PARP1, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase