Literature DB >> 30964039

Electroporation of Ishikawa cells: analysis by flow cytometry.

Thomas F Cronjé1, Paul T Gaynor2.   

Abstract

Electroporation facilitates loading of cells with molecules and substances that are normally membrane impermeable. Flow cytometry is used in this study to examine the effects of the application of electroporation-level monopolar electric field pulses of varying electrical field strength on Ishikawa endometrial adenocarcinoma cells. Analysis of the fluorescence versus forward scatter plots corroborates the well-recognised threshold and cell size dependence characteristics of electroporation, but also shows the progression of cell lysis and generation of particulate material. Two 500 µs monopolar rectangular pulses ranging from 1.0 × 105 to 2.5 × 105 V/m were used to electroporate the cells. Electroporation yields (fraction of viable cells exhibiting significant propidium iodide uptake) ranged from 0 to 97%, with viability ranging between 78 and 34% over the electric field strength range tested. The higher electric field strength pulses not only reduced cell viability, but also generated a substantial amount of sub-cellular sized particulate material indicating cells have been physically disrupted enough to create these particles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30964039      PMCID: PMC8676626          DOI: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2018.5194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol        ISSN: 1751-8741            Impact factor:   1.847


  28 in total

1.  Role of pulse shape in cell membrane electropermeabilization.

Authors:  T Kotnik; G Pucihar; M Rebersek; D Miklavcic; L M Mir
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2003-08-07

Review 2.  Adult mesenchymal stem cells: characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy.

Authors:  D Baksh; L Song; R S Tuan
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 3.  Membrane electroporation theories: a review.

Authors:  C Chen; S W Smye; M P Robinson; J A Evans
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Effect of cell size and shape on single-cell electroporation.

Authors:  Aparna Agarwal; Imants Zudans; Emily A Weber; Jessica Olofsson; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Electroporation of cell membranes: a review.

Authors:  S Y Ho; G S Mittal
Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 8.429

Review 6.  A brief overview of electroporation pulse strength-duration space: a region where additional intracellular effects are expected.

Authors:  James C Weaver; Kyle C Smith; Axel T Esser; Reuben S Son; T R Gowrishankar
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.373

7.  Scaling relationship and optimization of double-pulse electroporation.

Authors:  Mohamed M Sadik; Miao Yu; Mingde Zheng; Jeffrey D Zahn; Jerry W Shan; David I Shreiber; Hao Lin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Models for study of human embryo implantation: choice of cell lines?

Authors:  Natalie J Hannan; Premila Paiva; Evdokia Dimitriadis; Lois A Salamonsen
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  A study of the immunological response to tumor ablation with irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  B Al-Sakere; C Bernat; F Andre; E Connault; P Opolon; R V Davalos; L M Mir
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08

10.  Electroporation for nanomedicine: a review.

Authors:  Kisoo Kim; Won Gu Lee
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 6.331

View more
  1 in total

1.  Membrane disruption of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum induced by myriocin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LZN01.

Authors:  Hengxu Wang; Zhigang Wang; Zeping Liu; Kexin Wang; Weihui Xu
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 5.813

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.