| Literature DB >> 30960171 |
Yao Huang1, Semen Kormakov2, Xiaoxiang He3, Xiaolong Gao4, Xiuting Zheng5, Ying Liu6, Jingyao Sun7, Daming Wu8,9.
Abstract
This article reviews recent advances in conductive polymer composites from renewable resources, and introduces a number of potential applications for this material class. In order to overcome disadvantages such as poor mechanical properties of polymers from renewable resources, and give renewable polymer composites better electrical and thermal conductive properties, various filling contents and matrix polymers have been developed over the last decade. These natural or reusable filling contents, polymers, and their composites are expected to greatly reduce the tremendous pressure of industrial development on the natural environment while offering acceptable conductive properties. The unique characteristics, such as electrical/thermal conductivity, mechanical strength, biodegradability and recyclability of renewable conductive polymer composites has enabled them to be implemented in many novel and exciting applications including chemical sensors, light-emitting diode, batteries, fuel cells, heat exchangers, biosensors etc. In this article, the progress of conductive composites from natural or reusable filling contents and polymer matrices, including (1) natural polymers, such as starch and cellulose, (2) conductive filler, and (3) preparation approaches, are described, with an emphasis on potential applications of these bio-based conductive polymer composites. Moreover, several commonly-used and innovative methods for the preparation of conductive polymer composites are also introduced and compared systematically.Entities:
Keywords: electrical/thermal conductivity; polymer composites; properties and applications; renewable resources
Year: 2019 PMID: 30960171 PMCID: PMC6418900 DOI: 10.3390/polym11020187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Representation of interactions between plasticizer and starch during migration towards clay galleries (Reproduced with permission [27]).
Figure 2One-step solution based chitin nanofiber silk biocomposite (Reproduced with permission [30]).
Figure 3Polydispersity of unaged samples and samples aged at 100 °C for 14 days (Reproduced with permission [33]).
The conductivity of metal and carbon fillers.
| Filler Type | Electrical Conductivity (S/cm) | Thermal Conductivity (W/mK) | Density (g/cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminium | 3.538 × 105 | 234 | 2.7 |
| Copper | 5.977 × 105 | 386–400 | 8.9 |
| Silver | 6.305 × 105 | 417–427 | 10.53 |
| Nickel | 1.43 × 105 | 88.5 | 8.9 |
| CNTs | 3.8 × 105 | 2000–6000 | 2.1 |
| CF | 102~105 | 10–1000 | 1.5~2.0 |
| Graphene | 6000 | 4000–7000 | 1.06 |
| Graphite | 104 | 100–500 | 2.25 |
| Aluminium nitride | ˂10−13 | 100–319 | 3.235 |
| Boron nitride | 10−14 | 185–400 | 2.27 |
Figure 4The electrical conductivity of GNP/NFC composite paper measured with different amounts of GNPs (Reproduced with permission [47]).
Different dispersion techniques for the preparation of conductive composites.
| Matrix | Filler | Dispersion Technique | Max. Conductivity S/cm | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epoxy | Graphite | High speed mixer | 124 @ 75 vol % graphite | [ |
| PPS | Graphite | Melt mix | 73 @ 80 wt % graphite | [ |
| Epoxy | Graphite | Melt mix | 53 @ 80 wt % graphite | [ |
| COC | CF | Melt mix twin screw | 1.2 × 10−2 @ 60 phr CF | [ |
| Epoxy | CF | Melt compounding | 6.34 @ 80 wt % CF | [ |
| epoxy resin | CF | chemical vapor deposition | 0.022 | [ |
| LDPE | Copper | Internal mixer | 0.11 @ 24 vol % Copper + 76 vol % LDPE | [ |
| HDPE | Silver | Melt mix, twin screw | 0.01 @ 24 vol % silver + 76 vol % HDPE | [ |
| HDPE | Aluminum | Melt mix | 10−2 @ 55 vol % Aluminum + 45 vol % HDPE | [ |
| HDPE | Copper | Melt mix | 10−5.7 @ 55 vol % Copper + 45 vol % HDPE | [ |
| HDPE | Iron | Roll mill | [ | |
| PVDF | Zinc | Solution mix | 5 × 10−4 @ 50 vol % zinc + 50 vol % PVDF | [ |
| SBS | Copper nanowires | Vacuum filtrated | 1858 @ 20 wt % CUNWS + 80 wt % SBS | [ |
| PVC | Copper | Dry mix, hot press | 103.8 @ 38 vol % copper + 62 vol % PVC | [ |
| PS | Silver | In-situ bulk polymerization | 103 @ 20 wt % silver + 80 wt % PS | [ |
Figure 5Scheme of technological pathway of SCFNA and conventional compounding method (Reproduced with permission [82]).
Figure 6Fabrication process of NGO for conductive and capacitive fabrics (Reproduced with permission [90]).
Figure 7The plot of predicted effective electrical conductivity compared with experimental data for BC/MWCNT nanocomposite aerogels (the inset illustrates the log conductivity against log (ϕ-ϕc)) (Reproduced with permission [142]).
Figure 8Viscosity-shear rate curves of dispersions (1%) of PM-pectin-CNTs (▲) and CIpectin-CNTs (■) at 25 °C as measured by rotational viscometry (Reproduced with permission [157]).