Literature DB >> 30958124

Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits.

Amanda J Moehring1, Janette W Boughman2.   

Abstract

Males in many species have elaborated sexual traits that females strongly prefer, and these traits often conspicuously differ among species. How novel preferences and traits originate, however, is a challenging evolutionary problem because the initial appearance of only the female preference or only the male trait should reduce the ability to find a suitable mate, which could reduce fitness for individuals possessing those novel alleles. Here, we present a hypothesis for how novel preferences, as well as the novel male traits that females prefer, can originate, be favoured and spread in polyandrous species. Novel preference mutations can arise as 'veiled preferences' that are not expressed when the corresponding male trait is not present in the population, allowing preferences to be hidden from selection, and thus persist. In those cases when a male trait is present, veiled preferences provide a selective advantage, and females disproportionately produce offspring from preferred males through either mate choice or cryptic female choice. This tips the fitness advantage for novel males, allowing both preference and trait to spread, and limiting selection against them in the absence of the corresponding trait or preference.

Keywords:  cryptic female choice; novel female mate preference; novel male mating trait; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30958124      PMCID: PMC6405473          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  28 in total

1.  A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit?

Authors:  F Helen Rodd; Kimberly A Hughes; Gregory F Grether; Colette T Baril
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.

Authors:  Bryan D Neff; Trevor E Pitcher
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  A test of the critical assumption of the sensory bias model for the evolution of female mating preference using neural networks.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  "A taste for the beautiful": latent aesthetic mate preferences for white crests in two species of Australian grassfinches.

Authors:  N T Burley; R Symanski
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  SEXUAL ISOLATION, SPECIATION AND THE DIRECTION OF EVOLUTION.

Authors:  Kenneth Y Kaneshiro
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Mutation-order divergence by sexual selection: diversification of sexual signals in similar environments as a first step in speciation.

Authors:  Tamra C Mendelson; Michael D Martin; Samuel M Flaxman
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Postcopulatory sexual selection generates speciation phenotypes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Mollie K Manier; Stefan Lüpold; John M Belote; William T Starmer; Kirstin S Berben; Outi Ala-Honkola; William F Collins; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus.

Authors:  M J Ryan; J H Fox; W Wilczynski; A S Rand
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Females discriminate against heterospecific sperm in a natural hybrid zone.

Authors:  Emily R A Cramer; Murielle Ålund; S Eryn McFarlane; Arild Johnsen; Anna Qvarnström
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 10.  Postmating Female Control: 20 Years of Cryptic Female Choice.

Authors:  Renée C Firman; Clelia Gasparini; Mollie K Manier; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 17.712

View more
  4 in total

1.  The fruitless gene affects female receptivity and species isolation.

Authors:  Tabashir Chowdhury; Ryan M Calhoun; Katrina Bruch; Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolutionary novelty in communication between the sexes.

Authors:  E Dale Broder; Damian O Elias; Rafael L Rodríguez; Gil G Rosenthal; Brett M Seymoure; Robin M Tinghitella
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; E Dale Broder; James H Gallagher; Aaron W Wikle; David M Zonana
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Effects of social and environmental contexts on multi-male mating and mixed paternity in socially monogamous female prairie voles.

Authors:  Marissa A Rice; Sydney M Galindez; Joshua T Garner; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.653

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.