| Literature DB >> 30957195 |
Rebecca Gmoser1, Jorge A Ferreira2, Mohammad J Taherzadeh2, Patrik R Lennartsson2.
Abstract
A new post-treatment method of fungal biomass after fermentation is revealed. The post-treatment strategy was utilized to produce pigments as an additional valuable metabolite. Post-treatment included incubation at 95% relative humidity where the effects of harvesting time, light, and temperature were studied. Pigment-producing edible filamentous fungus Neurospora intermedia cultivated on ethanol plant residuals produced 4 g/L ethanol and 5 g/L fungal biomass. Harvesting the pale biomass after 48 h submerged cultivation compared to 24 h or 72 h increased pigmentation in the post-treatment step with 35% and 48%, respectively. The highest pigment content produced, 1.4 mg/g dry fungal biomass, was obtained from washed biomass treated in light at 35 °C whereof the major impact on pigmentation was from washed biomass. Moreover, post-treated biomass contained 50% (w/w) crude protein. The post-treatment strategy successfully adds pigments to pre-obtained biomass. The pigmented fungal biomass can be considered for animal feed applications for domestic animals.Entities:
Keywords: Carotenoids; Edible filamentous fungi; Neurospora intermedia; Pigments; Post-treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30957195 PMCID: PMC6689318 DOI: 10.1007/s12010-019-02961-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Biochem Biotechnol ISSN: 0273-2289 Impact factor: 2.926
Factors and level of factors included in the full-factorial and single-factor experiments
| Full-factorial experiment | |||
| Light | Temp (°C) | Cultivation time (h) | Biomass |
| Light | 25 | 24 | Prewashed |
| Dark | 35 | 48 | Unwashed |
| Single-factor experiments | |||
| Light exposure | Cultivation time (h) | Fungal biomass mc (%) | |
| 1 min | 24 | 76 | |
| 1 h | 48 | 83 | |
| 24 h | 72 | 89 | |
| 96 | 93 | ||
| 96 | |||
mc moisture content
General factorial regression (box-Cox transformation λ = 0) ANOVA—analysis of variances for transformed response (y = ln x), summarizing factors and interaction between factors comprises significant effect on pigment production. Factors were considered significant at p < 0.05. The model explains about 89% of the variability in the pigment production (R2 = 88.85). Symbol × refers to interaction between factors
| Source | ||
|---|---|---|
| Constant | − 21.32 | 0.000 |
| Light | 5.7 | 0.000 |
| Biomass | 8.01 | 0.000 |
| 2-way interactions | ||
| Light×submerged fermentation time | − 2.8 | 0.013 |
| Temperature×biomass | − 2.61 | 0.019 |
| Light×temperature | 0.18 | 0.677 |
| 3-way interactions | ||
| Light×temperature×submerged fermentation time | 2.32 | 0.034 |
|
| R-sq | R-sq (adj) |
| 0.425462 | 88.85% | 78.40% |
Transformed model coefficients with standard error (SE) values and fitted means for each significant main effect and interactions
| Source | Fitted coefficients (transformed) | SE coefficient (transformed) | Fitted means (original) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light | − 1.174 | 0.107 | 0.309 |
| Dark | − 2.033 | 0.107 | 0.131 |
| Washed | − 1.001 | 0.107 | 0.368 |
| Unwashed | − 2.206 | 0.107 | 0.11 |
| Light×24 h | − 1.446 | 0.152 | 0.235 |
| Light×48 h | − 0.903 | 0.152 | 0.406 |
| Dark×24 h | − 1.883 | 0.152 | 0.152 |
| Dark×48 h | − 2.182 | 0.152 | 0.113 |
| 25 °C × washed | − 1.126 | 0.152 | 0.324 |
| 25 °C × unwashed | − 1.938 | 0.152 | 0.144 |
| 35 °C × washed | − 0.876 | 0.152 | 0.417 |
| 35 °C × unwashed | − 2.475 | 0.152 | 0.084 |
| Light×25 °C × 24 h | − 1.081 | 0.215 | 0.339 |
| Light×25 °C × 48 h | − 1.189 | 0.215 | 0.305 |
| Light×35 °C × 24 h | − 1.812 | 0.215 | 0.163 |
| Light×35 °C × 48 h | − 0.616 | 0.215 | 0.54 |
| Dark×25 °C × 24 h | − 1.802 | 0.215 | 0.165 |
| Dark×25 °C × 48 h | − 2.056 | 0.215 | 0.128 |
| Dark×35 °C × 24 h | − 1.963 | 0.215 | 0.14 |
| Dark×35 °C × 48 h | − 2.309 | 0.215 | 0.099 |
Fig. 1Individual mean values milligrams β-carotene/grams dry biomass for each group of combination. On the x-axis, 24 h and 48 h represent submerged fermentation time, washed or unwashed fungal biomass relates to a washing step or no washing with distilled water before post-treatment, 25 °C and 35 °C as well as light and dark represent the temperature and light source conditions during post-treatment of the fungal biomass in 95% relative humidity. Error bars represent the SD of the mean
Fig. 2The concentration profiles of glucose (filled diamonds), other sugars (squares), and ethanol (filled triangles) in thin stillage over time in the bubble column reactor are also shown. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation
Fig. 3Pigment production in N. intermedia biomass after incubation in a glass beaker for 48 h in 95% Rh, at 35 °C under light. The x-axis represents the distance from the top height of the fungal biomass. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation