| Literature DB >> 30957026 |
Tarjei Tørre Asprusten1, Maria Pedersen2, Eva Skovlund3,4, Vegard Bruun Wyller1,2.
Abstract
We assessed referring medical practitioner's ability to predict chronic fatigue development in adolescents presenting with acute infectious mononucleosis. Compared with 'not fatigued' being predicted as 'unsurely fatigued' and 'likely fatigued' were both strongly associated with developing fatigue 6 months later (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.16% to 5.47% and 3.2, 95% CI 1.19% to 8.61%, respectively, P=0.012). The positive and negative predictive values were 66% and 62%, respectively. Disentangling the physician's intuition may be of interest in further investigations of risk factors and prophylactic factors for fatigue development.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent health; chronic fatigue syndrome
Year: 2019 PMID: 30957026 PMCID: PMC6422241 DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Paediatr Open ISSN: 2399-9772
Comparison of patients with referring medical practitioner not responding versus referring medical practitioner responding to questionnaire administered per mail
| Not responding | Responding | Diff. | 95% CI of diff. | |
| Gender—no. (%) | ||||
| Male | 14 (40) | 57 (34.5) | n.a. | n.a. |
| Female | 21 (60) | 108 (65.5) | ||
| Age—years, mean (SD) | 16.9 (1.3) | 16.9 (1.6) | −0.01 | −0.52% to 0.49% |
| BMI—kg/m2, mean (SD) | 21.1 (2.4) | 21.4 (2.6) | −0.23 | −1.2% to 0.67% |
| Steps per day—number, mean (SD) | 7559 (2860) | 7506 (3131) | 56 | −1146% to 1253% |
| Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire—total score, mean (SD) | 7.5 (2.9) | 6.8 (2.7) | 0.64 | 0.55% to −0.44% |
| Function Disability Inventory—total score, mean (SD) | 18.6 (12.8) | 16.1 (11.6) | 2.5 | −2.1% to 6.8% |
BMI, body mass index.
Predicted and observed fatigue 6 months after acute Epstein-Barr virus-infection
| Observed | |||
| Fatigued (CFQ≥4) | Not fatigued (CFQ<4) | CFQ-score (95 % CI) | |
| Prediction | |||
| Likely fatigued* (%) | 14 (66.7) | 7 (33.3) | 5.6 (3.9 to 7.3) |
| Unsurely fatigued* (%) | 22 (61.1) | 14 (38.9) | 4.8 (3.7 to 5.8) |
| Not fatigued* (%) | 40 (38.5) | 64 (61.5) | 3.2 (2.7 to 3.8) |
| Sensitivity†=18.4% | Specificity†=75.3% | ||
*Referring medical practitioner’s guess; no=not fatigued, don’t know=unsurely fatigued, yes=likely fatigued.
†Sensitivity and specificity are calculated after an intention-to-diagnose principle5; when calculating sensitivity, unsurely fatigued is included in the false negatives, while in calculation of specificity those predicted unsurely fatigued is included in false positives.
CQF, Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire.