Literature DB >> 30954697

Comparison of the performance of pulsed and continuous UVC-LED irradiation in the inactivation of bacteria.

Paul Onkundi Nyangaresi1, Yi Qin1, Guolong Chen2, Baoping Zhang3, Yinghua Lu4, Liang Shen5.   

Abstract

Ultraviolet light-emitting diode (UV-LED) is a newly emerging UV light source with a potential to replace the conventional chemical methods, mercury UV lamps and xenon lamps in water disinfection. UV-LEDs are characterized by the diversity in wavelengths and can be turned on and off with a high and adjustable frequency, making them an attractive candidate for pulsed light (PL) disinfection apart from the conventional continuous wave (CW) operation. Previous studies on comparison between the PL and CW UV-LED irradiations for the inactivation of bacterium in water disinfection are limited and results conflict. In this work, PL and CW UV-LED in the C-spectral band (UVC-LED) irradiations were compared at equivalent fluence in the inactivation and subsequent photoreactivation of E. coli bacteria. In addition, effect of different driving currents and ambient temperatures on solder temperature of the PL and CW UVC-LED irradiation was also examined. Under the equivalent fluences, the PL and CW UVC-LED irradiations brought comparable inactivation efficiency and similar photoreactivation of the E. coli. Moreover, the PL UVC-LED exhibited a much lower solder temperature than the CW UVC-LED irradiation. On the other hand, CW UVC-LED irradiation, higher ambient temperature and higher driving current increased the solder temperature that resulted to a negative impact on the wavelength, full width at half maximum, optical power and irradiance, which are key factors in the UVC-LED disinfection efficiency. In all, this work reports the comparison between PL and CW in UVC-LED irradiation for inactivating E. coli bacteria and firstly revealed the photoreactivation of the E. coli after the PL UVC-LEDs irradiation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous wave; Inactivation; Irradiation; Photoreactivation; Pulsed light; UVC-LED

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30954697     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  Ultraviolet-C and other methods of decontamination of filtering facepiece N-95 respirators during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Angeli Eloise Torres; Alexis B Lyons; Shanthi Narla; Indermeet Kohli; Angela Parks-Miller; David Ozog; Iltefat H Hamzavi; Henry W Lim
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Design and Implementation of a Germicidal UVC-LED Lamp.

Authors:  Francisco A Juarez-Leon; Allan Giovanni Soriano-Sanchez; Martin A Rodriguez-Licea; Francisco J Perez-Pinal
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  The effects of base station as an electromagnetic radiation source on flower and cone yield and germination percentage in Pinus brutia Ten.

Authors:  Halil Baris Ozel; Mehmet Cetin; Hakan Sevik; Tugrul Varol; Berkant Isik; Barbaros Yaman
Journal:  Biol Futur       Date:  2021-04-26

Review 4.  Ultraviolet-C and other methods of decontamination of filtering facepiece N-95 respirators during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Angeli Eloise Torres; Alexis B Lyons; Shanthi Narla; Indermeet Kohli; Angela Parks-Miller; David Ozog; Iltefat H Hamzavi; Henry W Lim
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Preliminary Study of Pulsed Ultraviolet Technology for Low-Temperature Disinfection.

Authors:  Luyao Li; Tao Li; Jin Shen; Huihui Sun; Hongyang Duan; Changping Zhu; Wei Zhang; Chen Liang; Baoying Zhang; Yan Li; Liubo Zhang
Journal:  China CDC Wkly       Date:  2022-04-22

Review 6.  A Comprehensive Analysis of the UVC LEDs' Applications and Decontamination Capability.

Authors:  Talita Nicolau; Núbio Gomes Filho; Jorge Padrão; Andrea Zille
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.748

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.