Literature DB >> 30954146

Alveolar ridge preservation using a non-resorbable membrane: randomized clinical trial with biomolecular analysis.

D Mandarino1, D Luz1, V Moraschini1, D M Rodrigues1, E S P Barboza2.   

Abstract

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the newly formed tissues in post-extraction sockets and to compare ridge dimensional changes with and without the use of a dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (d-PTFE). Twenty human extraction sockets (lower molars and premolars) received either an intentionally exposed d-PTFE membrane (test group) or no biomaterial (control group). After 4 months, during preparation for implant placement, bone and gingival tissues were collected for histological and biomolecular analysis. Clinically, the test and control groups showed mean gains of keratinized gingiva of 4.30±1.20mm and 2.50±2.20mm, respectively. A reduction in ridge width was observed in the control (2.90±2.70mm) and test (3.30±2.00mm) groups. The bone height alteration ranged from a reduction of 0.12±1.60mm to a gain of 0.60±3.60mm on average for both groups. Analysis of gene expression (OPG/RANKL) in gingival fibroblasts and osteoblasts revealed no difference between the two groups. Ridge preservation using the d-PTFE membrane increased the formation of keratinized tissue. A reduction in width and mild reduction/gain in height of the alveolar ridge was observed in both groups. The membrane had no influence on the healing process.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dimensional change; guided bone regeneration; keratinized tissue; non-resorbable membrane; socket preservation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30954146     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha; Alan Gt Payne; Sara Ali; Clovis M Jr Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-26

2.  Bone Regeneration Assessment of Polycaprolactone Membrane on Critical-Size Defects in Rat Calvaria.

Authors:  Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi; Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli; Tamires Mello Francatti; Ana Carulina Rezende de Moares Ferreira; Járede Carvalho Pereira; Hesham Mohammed Al-Sharani; Flavia de Almeida Lucas; Leonardo Perez Faverani
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 3.  Sealing materials for post-extraction site: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Massimo Del Fabbro; Grazia Tommasato; Paolo Pesce; Andrea Ravidà; Shahnawaz Khijmatgar; Anton Sculean; Matthew Galli; Donato Antonacci; Luigi Canullo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of Different Fixation Methods for Combined Histological and Biomolecular Analysis of Fixed and Decalcified Bone Samples.

Authors:  Sarah Al-Maawi; Priscilia Valenzuela; Eva Dohle; Anja Heselich; Robert Sader; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2022-07-21

Review 5.  The Use of Biocompatible Membranes in Oral Surgery: The Past, Present & Future Directions. A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ioannis Kormas; Alessandro Pedercini; Hatem Alassy; Larry F Wolff
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-29

6.  A retrospective cohort study of how alveolar ridge preservation affects the need of alveolar ridge augmentation at posterior tooth implant sites.

Authors:  Kai-Fang Hu; Ying-Chu Lin; Yu-Ting Huang; Yu-Hsiang Chou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.