Literature DB >> 30952994

High proportions of bacteria are culturable across major biomes.

Adam C Martiny1,2.   

Abstract

The paradigm that only 1% of microbes are culturable has had a profound impact on our understanding of microbial ecology and is still a major motivation for mostly using molecular tools to characterize microbial communities. However, this point is often expressed vaguely, suggesting that some scientists have different interpretations of the paradigm. In addition, there have been substantial advances in cultivation techniques suggesting that this paradigm may no longer be correct. To quantify bacterial culturability across six major biomes, I found that the median 16S rRNA similarity of bacteria to known cultured relatives was 97.3 ± 2.3% (s.d.). Furthermore, 52.0 ± 24% of sequences and 34.9 ± 23% of taxa (defined as >97% similar) had a closely related cultured relative. Thus, many cells and taxa across environments are culturable with known techniques, suggesting that the 1% paradigm is no longer correct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30952994      PMCID: PMC6775996          DOI: 10.1038/s41396-019-0410-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  1 in total

Review 1.  Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation.

Authors:  R I Amann; W Ludwig; K H Schleifer
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-03
  1 in total
  26 in total

1.  Linking microbial communities to ecosystem functions: what we can learn from genotype-phenotype mapping in organisms.

Authors:  Andrew Morris; Kyle Meyer; Brendan Bohannan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Ecological and evolutionary mechanisms underlying patterns of phylosymbiosis in host-associated microbial communities.

Authors:  Kevin D Kohl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Microbial diversity in tropical marine sediments assessed using culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques.

Authors:  Alyssa M Demko; Nastassia V Patin; Paul R Jensen
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Progress and Challenges in Studying the Ecophysiology of Archaea.

Authors:  Panagiotis S Adam; Till L V Bornemann; Alexander J Probst
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 5.  Unboxing the black box-one step forward to understand the soil microbiome: A systematic review.

Authors:  Apurva Mishra; Lal Singh; Dharmesh Singh
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Application of machine learning techniques for creating urban microbial fingerprints.

Authors:  Feargal Joseph Ryan
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 7.  Current and Promising Approaches to Identify Horizontal Gene Transfer Events in Metagenomes.

Authors:  Gavin M Douglas; Morgan G I Langille
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  A Microbial Sampling and Community Reconstruction Activity for Introducing Students to the Burgeoning Field of Metagenomics.

Authors:  Ashley N Williams; John Stavrinides
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 9.  Complex interactions between the microbiome and cancer immune therapy.

Authors:  Drew J Schwartz; Olivia N Rebeck; Gautam Dantas
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 6.250

10.  Estimate of the sequenced proportion of the global prokaryotic genome.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Jianing Wang; Jinlan Wang; Jingjing Wang; Yuezhong Li
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 14.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.