| Literature DB >> 30951273 |
Martha Merino-Ruiz1, Felipe Arturo Morales-Martínez1, Edith Navar-Vizcarra1, Otto H Valdés-Martínez1, Luis H Sordia-Hernández1, Donato Saldívar-Rodríguez1, Oscar Vidal-Gutiérrez1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the effect of apoptotic sperm elimination with MACS in patients that require IVF.Entities:
Keywords: ICSI; MACS; annexins V
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30951273 PMCID: PMC6501751 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JBRA Assist Reprod ISSN: 1517-5693
Description of the variables in the study and control group
| VARIABLE | Study group average (range) | Control group average (range) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 46 | 46 | |
| Women age (years) | 36 (24-46) | 36 (20-47) | NS |
| Male age (years) | 37 (24-53) | 39.7 (30-58) | NS |
| Total ovules | 8.5 (1-31) | 9.7 (3-28) | NS |
| Oocytes MII | 6.3 (0-22) | 6.8 (1-18) | NS |
| Fertilization | 5.0 (1-10) | 4.5 (1-10) | NS |
| Division | 4.2 (1-9) | 3.9 (1-9) | NS |
| Transferred embryos | 2.07 (1-3) | 2.3 (1-4) | NS |
| Vitrified embryos | 1.0 (0-4) | 1.0 (0-7) | NS |
| Viable embryos | 3.1 (1-6) | 3.2 (1-9) | NS |
| Counts/106per ml (in fresh) | 128 (1-470) | 78 (0.5-248) | NS |
| Mobile forms /106per ml (fresh) | 121 (18-486) | 72 (1-488) | NS |
| Counts/106per ml (post capacitation) | 52 (7-216) | 30 (0.4-123) | NS |
| Mobile forms/106 per ml (post capacitation) | 43 (0.1-100) | 35.4 (0.3-100) | NS |
Figure 1Infertility couple factors
Analysis of semen samples in fresh and subsequent to MACS technique in relation to motility, vitality, and morphology
| Mean | Standard deviation | Student's T | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOT-F/MOT-A | -11.26087 | 20.76903 | -3.677 | 0.001 |
| VIT-F/VIT-A | -3.41304 | 10.67203 | -2.169 | 0.035 |
| PAP-F/PAP-A | -7.11364 | 7.74361 | -6.094 | 0.000 |
With statistical significance (p<0.05)
MOT-F / MOT-A: fresh motility / motility with annexins.
VIT-F / VIT-A: fresh vitality / vitality after annexins.
PAP-A: staining with Papanicolaou technique in fresh / staining with Papanicolaou after annexin.
Analysis of the study groups subdivided into own versus donated eggs in relation to the rate of fertilization, division and viable embryos
| OWN | DONATED | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | |||
| % fertilization | 67 | 80 | 0.001 | 75 | 79 | 0.502 |
| % division | 86 | 82 | 0.440 | 87 | 80 | 0.182 |
| % viable embryo | 83 | 74 | 0.121 | 81 | 69 | 0.050 |
p<0.05 with statistical significance.
Analysis of the pregnancy course with own vs donated eggs
| Own eggs | Donated eggs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | |||
| IPT (+) | 6 (20.7%) | 9 (52.9%) | 0.015 |
| FHR (+) | 5 (17.2%) | 5 (29.4%) | 0.014 |
| Study group | |||
| IPT (+) | 7 (23.3%) | 8 (50.0%) | 0.0016 |
| FHR (+) | 5 (20.6%) | 8 (50.0%) | 0.0002 |
Statistical significance (p<0.05)
Results of the IPT in the groups of patients with donated eggs
| Study group n=46 | Control group n=46 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total cases IPT (+) | 15 (32.6%) | 15 (32.6%) | 1 |
| Donated eggs IPT (+) | 8 (50%) | 9 (52.9%) | 0.67 |
| Donated eggs FHR (+) | 8 (50%) | 5 (29.4%) | 0.002 |
Statistical significance (p<0.05)