Literature DB >> 30947892

Challenges and Opportunities for Lung Cancer Screening in Rural America.

Cassie L Odahowski1, Whitney E Zahnd2, Jan M Eberth3.   

Abstract

Rural populations have higher rates of smoking and both lung cancer incidence and mortality compared with their urban peers. As such, it is imperative that high-risk, rural populations have access to recommended low-dose CT (LDCT) screening, which can detect lung cancer at an earlier, more treatable stage. Data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative survey, were analyzed to assess nonmetropolitan-metropolitan and geographic differences in LDCT utilization among screening-eligible individuals. Screening uptake did not differ by nonmetropolitan vs. metropolitan status (3.72% and 3.83%, respectively). Regional uptake varied from 1.58% in the West to 10.11% in the Northeast. Additionally, nonmetropolitan populations represent a disproportionately high 23% of the screening-eligible population despite accounting for only 15% of the US population. There are two key challenges to high-quality LDCT screening experienced by rural populations: (1) geographic access to LDCT screening programs and (2) provider-patient communication. Despite the increased availability of LDCT screening centers since 2015, which is when most insurance plans began to cover the costs of screening, centers are geographically maldistributed relative to the rural-urban and regional need. Although decision aids can facilitate discussion between providers and patients regarding the risks and benefits of LDCT screening, research on the uptake and utility of these tools in rural areas is very limited. Analyses of population-based surveys and administrative and clinical data are needed to continue to surveil screening utilization, elucidate predictors of screening use, and inform shared decision-making tools and interventions for at-risk rural populations.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Early detection of cancer; lung cancer; rural; survey

Year:  2019        PMID: 30947892     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  15 in total

1.  Challenges of using nationally representative, population-based surveys to assess rural cancer disparities.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Natoshia Askelson; Robin C Vanderpool; Lindsay Stradtman; Jean Edward; Paige E Farris; Victoria Petermann; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Distribution and Geographic Accessibility of Lung Cancer Screening Centers in the United States.

Authors:  Soumya J Niranjan; William Opoku-Agyeman; Nathaniel W Carroll; Amanda Dorsey; Meghan Tipre; Monica L Baskin; Mark T Dransfield
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-09

3.  Association of Rurality With Annual Repeat Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Lucy B Spalluto; Jennifer A Lewis; Lauren R Samuels; Carol Callaway-Lane; Michael E Matheny; Jason Denton; Jennifer A Robles; Robert S Dittus; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke; Pierre P Massion; Drew Moghanaki; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Implementation and Uptake of Rural Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Tri Le; Stacie Miller; Emily Berry; Sarah Zamarripa; Aurelio Rodriguez; Benjamin Barkley; Asha Kandathil; Cecelia Brewington; Keith E Argenbright; David E Gerber
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Beliefs and Practices of Primary Care Providers Regarding Performing Low-Dose CT Studies for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Christopher G Slatore; Sara E Golden; Tara Thomas; Mary Patzel; Sarah Bumatay; Jackilen Shannon; Melinda Davis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research.

Authors:  Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Electra D Paskett; Katherine B Peters; Janette K Merrill; Jonathan Phillips; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.816

7.  A Multilevel Approach to Investigate Relationships Between Healthcare Resources and Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Darryl Somayaji; Young S Seo; Gregory E Wilding; Ekaterina Noyes
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.364

8.  Potential Disparities by Sex and Race or Ethnicity in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Rates.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Yan Kwan Lau; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 10.262

9.  Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggested Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening Among a Rural Screening-Eligible Population.

Authors:  Jenna E Schiffelbein; Kathleen L Carluzzo; Rian M Hasson; Jennifer A Alford-Teaster; Inger Imset; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

10.  Using Population-Based Cancer Registration Data and Period Analysis to Accurately Assess and Predict 5-Year Relative Survival for Lung Cancer Patients in Eastern China.

Authors:  Runhua Li; Min Zhang; Yongran Cheng; Xiyi Jiang; Huijuan Tang; Liangyou Wang; Tianhui Chen; Bicheng Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.