Literature DB >> 35510544

A Multilevel Approach to Investigate Relationships Between Healthcare Resources and Lung Cancer.

Darryl Somayaji, Young S Seo, Gregory E Wilding, Ekaterina Noyes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening for lung cancer is an evidence-based but underutilized measure to reduce the burden of lung cancer mortality. Lack of adequate data on geographic availability of lung cancer screening inhibits the ability of healthcare providers to help patients with decision-making and impedes equity-focused implementation of screening-supportive services.
OBJECTIVES: This analysis used data from the 2012-2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the county health ranking to examine (a) which cancer resources and county-level factors are associated with late-stage lung cancer at diagnosis and (b) associations between county rurality and lung cancer incidence/mortality rates.
METHODS: Using the New York state SEER data, we identified 68,990 lung cancer patients aged 20-112 years; 48.3% had late-stage lung cancers, and the average lung cancer incidence and mortality rates were 70.7 and 46.2 per 100,000, respectively. There were 144 American College of Radiology-designated lung cancer screening centers and 376 Federally Qualified Health Centers identified in New York state. County rurality was associated with a higher proportion of late-stage lung cancers and higher lung cancer mortality rates. DISCUSSION: Visual geomapping showed the scarcity of rural counties' healthcare resources. County rurality is a significant factor in differences in lung cancer screening resources and patient outcomes. Use of publicly available data with geospatial methods provides ways to identify areas for improvement, populations at risk, and additional infrastructure needs.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35510544      PMCID: PMC9420764          DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.364


  27 in total

1.  Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods.

Authors:  F WILCOXIN
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1947-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The Landscape of US Lung Cancer Screening Services.

Authors:  Minal S Kale; Juan Wisnivesky; Emanuela Taioli; Bian Liu
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Cancer-Incidence, prevalence and mortality in the oldest-old. A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Shantell C Nolen; Marcella A Evans; Avital Fischer; Maria M Corrada; Claudia H Kawas; Daniela A Bota
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.432

4.  Perspectives on Policy and the Value of Nursing Science in a Big Data Era.

Authors:  Sheila M Gephart; Mary Davis; Kimberly Shea
Journal:  Nurs Sci Q       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.883

5.  Examining urban and rural differences in perceived timeliness of care among cancer patients: A SEER-CAHPS study.

Authors:  Michelle A Mollica; Kathryn E Weaver; Timothy S McNeel; Erin E Kent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Area Deprivation Index and Rurality in Relation to Lung Cancer Prevalence and Mortality in a Rural State.

Authors:  Kathleen M Fairfield; Adam W Black; Erika C Ziller; Kimberly Murray; F Lee Lucas; Leo B Waterston; Neil Korsen; Darlene Ineza; Paul K J Han
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-03-07

Review 7.  Lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: From a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Jie Dai; Ping Yang; Angela Cox; Gening Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-14

8.  Lung Cancer Incidence in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Counties - United States, 2007-2016.

Authors:  Mary Elizabeth O'Neil; S Jane Henley; Elizabeth A Rohan; Taylor D Ellington; M Shayne Gallaway
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancer.

Authors:  Wiley D Jenkins; Alicia K Matthews; Angie Bailey; Whitney E Zahnd; Karriem S Watson; Georgia Mueller-Luckey; Yamile Molina; David Crumly; Julie Patera
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-03-24

10.  Geographic Availability of Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States, 2017.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Parisa Bozorgi; Logan M Lebrón; Sarah E Bills; Linda J Hazlett; Ruth C Carlos; Jennifer C King
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.