Literature DB >> 30947386

Using computer-assisted morphometrics of 5-year biopsies to identify biomarkers of late renal allograft loss.

Aleksandar Denic1, Martha C Morales2, Walter D Park2, Byron H Smith3, Walter K Kremers3, Mariam P Alexander4, Fernando G Cosio1, Andrew D Rule1, Mark D Stegall2.   

Abstract

The current Banff scoring system was not developed to predict graft loss and may not be ideal for use in clinical trials aimed at improving allograft survival. We hypothesized that scoring histologic features of digitized renal allograft biopsies using a continuous, more objective, computer-assisted morphometric (CAM) system might be more predictive of graft loss. We performed a nested case-control study in kidney transplant recipients with a surveillance biopsy obtained 5 years after transplantation. Patients that developed death-censored graft loss (n = 67) were 2:1 matched on age, gender, and follow-up time to controls with surviving grafts (n = 134). The risk of graft loss was compared between CAM-based models vs a model based on Banff scores. Both Banff and CAM identified chronic lesions associated with graft loss (chronic glomerulopathy, arteriolar hyalinosis, and mesangial expansion). However, the CAM-based models predicted graft loss better than the Banff-based model, both overall (c-statistic 0.754 vs 0.705, P < .001), and in biopsies without chronic glomerulopathy (c-statistic 0.738 vs 0.661, P < .001) where it identified more features predictive of graft loss (% luminal stenosis and % mesangial expansion). Using 5-year renal allograft surveillance biopsies, CAM-based models predict graft loss better than Banff models and might be developed into biomarkers for future clinical trials.
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; biopsy; clinical research/practice; kidney failure/injury; kidney transplantation/nephrology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30947386      PMCID: PMC8214914          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  14 in total

1.  Superiority of virtual microscopy versus light microscopy in transplantation pathology.

Authors:  Yasemin Ozluk; Paula L Blanco; Michael Mengel; Kim Solez; Philip F Halloran; Banu Sis
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Renal Allograft Histology at 10 Years After Transplantation in the Tacrolimus Era: Evidence of Pervasive Chronic Injury.

Authors:  M D Stegall; L D Cornell; W D Park; B H Smith; F G Cosio
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies.

Authors:  Kuang-Yu Jen; Jean L Olson; Sergey Brodsky; Xin J Zhou; Tibor Nadasdy; Zoltan G Laszik
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  The Substantial Loss of Nephrons in Healthy Human Kidneys with Aging.

Authors:  Aleksandar Denic; John C Lieske; Harini A Chakkera; Emilio D Poggio; Mariam P Alexander; Prince Singh; Walter K Kremers; Lilach O Lerman; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Detection and Clinical Patterns of Nephron Hypertrophy and Nephrosclerosis Among Apparently Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Aleksandar Denic; Mariam P Alexander; Vidhu Kaushik; Lilach O Lerman; John C Lieske; Mark D Stegall; Joseph J Larson; Walter K Kremers; Terri J Vrtiska; Harini A Chakkera; Emilio D Poggio; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Morphometric and visual evaluation of fibrosis in renal biopsies.

Authors:  Alton B Farris; Catherine D Adams; Nicole Brousaides; Patricia A Della Pelle; A Bernard Collins; Ellie Moradi; R Neal Smith; Paul C Grimm; Robert B Colvin
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Evaluation of pre-implantation kidney biopsies: comparison of Banff criteria to a morphometric approach.

Authors:  José António Lopes; Francesc Moreso; Luis Riera; Marta Carrera; Meritxell Ibernon; Xavier Fulladosa; Josep Maria Grinyó; Daniel Serón
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 8.  Through a glass darkly: seeking clarity in preventing late kidney transplant failure.

Authors:  Mark D Stegall; Robert S Gaston; Fernando G Cosio; Arthur Matas
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Identifying specific causes of kidney allograft loss.

Authors:  Z M El-Zoghby; M D Stegall; D J Lager; W K Kremers; H Amer; J M Gloor; F G Cosio
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 10.  Computational Biology: Modeling Chronic Renal Allograft Injury.

Authors:  Mark D Stegall; Richard Borrows
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prognostic Implications of a Morphometric Evaluation for Chronic Changes on All Diagnostic Native Kidney Biopsies.

Authors:  Aleksandar Denic; Marija Bogojevic; Aidan F Mullan; Moldovan Sabov; Muhammad S Asghar; Sanjeev Sethi; Maxwell L Smith; Fernando C Fervenza; Richard J Glassock; Musab S Hommos; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 14.978

2.  A Higher Foci Density of Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy Predicts Progressive CKD after a Radical Nephrectomy for Tumor.

Authors:  Luisa Ricaurte Archila; Aleksandar Denic; Aidan F Mullan; Ramya Narasimhan; Marija Bogojevic; R Houston Thompson; Bradley C Leibovich; S Jeson Sangaralingham; Maxwell L Smith; Mariam P Alexander; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 14.978

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence and algorithmic computational pathology: an introduction with renal allograft examples.

Authors:  Alton B Farris; Juan Vizcarra; Mohamed Amgad; Lee A D Cooper; David Gutman; Julien Hogan
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.087

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.