Literature DB >> 3094683

Mortality of workers at the Sellafield plant of British Nuclear Fuels.

P G Smith, A J Douglas.   

Abstract

The mortality of all 14,327 people who were known to have been employed at the Sellafield plant of British Nuclear Fuels at any time between the opening of the site in 1947 and 31 December 1975 was studied up to the end of 1983. The vital state of 96% of the workers was traced satisfactorily and 2277 were found to have died, 572 (25%) from cancer. On average the workers suffered a mortality from all causes that was 2% less than that of the general population of England and Wales and 9% less than that of the population of Cumberland (the area in which the plant is sited). Their mortality from cancers of all kinds was 5% less than that of England and Wales and 3% less than that of Cumberland. In the five years after their first employment Sellafield workers had an overall mortality that was 70% of that of England and Wales, probably due to healthier members of the population being selected for employment. Raised death rates from cancers of several specific sites were found, but only for those of ill defined and secondary sites was the excess statistically significant (30 observed, 19.7 expected). For cancers of the liver and gall bladder there was a significant deficit of deaths (four observed, 10.5 expected). Workers in areas of the plant where radiation exposure was likely were issued with dosimeters to measure their external exposure to ionising radiations. Personal dose records were maintained for workers who entered such areas other than infrequently. Workers with personal dose records ("radiation" workers) had lower death rates from all causes combined than other workers but the death rates from cancer in the two groups were similar. Compared with the general population radiation workers had statistically significant deficits of liver and gall bladder cancer, lung cancer, and Hodgkin's disease. There were excesses of deaths from myeloma (seven observed, 4.2 expected) and prostatic cancer (19 observed, 15.8 expected) but these were not significant and there was no evidence of an excess of leukaemia (10 deaths observed, 12.2 expected) or cancer of the pancreas (15 observed, 17.8 expected). Non-radiation workers had a significant deficit of leukaemia (one death observed, 5.1 expected) and a significant excess of cancers of ill defined and secondary sites (13 deaths observed, 5.8 expected). For no type of cancer was the ratio of observed to expected deaths significantly different between radiation and non-radiation workers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3094683      PMCID: PMC1341635          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.293.6551.845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  5 in total

1.  A further update of the analysis of mortality of workers in a nuclear facility.

Authors:  H D Tolley; S Marks; J A Buchanan; E S Gilbert
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  An analysis of the mortality of workers in a nuclear facility.

Authors:  E S Gilbert; S Marks
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Radiation exposures of Hanford workers dying from cancer and other causes.

Authors:  T F Mancuso; A Stewart; G Kneale
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Radiation, work experience, and cause specific mortality among workers at an energy research laboratory.

Authors:  H Checkoway; R M Mathew; C M Shy; J E Watson; W G Tankersley; S H Wolf; J C Smith; S A Fry
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1985-08

5.  Mortality of employees of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, 1946-1979.

Authors:  V Beral; H Inskip; P Fraser; M Booth; D Coleman; G Rose
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-08-17
  5 in total
  29 in total

1.  Removal of radiation dose response effects: an example of over-matching.

Authors:  J L Marsh; J L Hutton; Keith Binks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-10

Review 2.  Haematology.

Authors:  N T O'Connor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Completeness of follow up in a cohort study of mortality using the United Kingdom National Health Service Central Registers and records held by the Department of Social Security.

Authors:  S C Darby; J A O'Hagan; G M Kendall; R Doll; T P Fell; C R Muirhead
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Methods and basic data of case-control study of leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria.

Authors:  M J Gardner; A J Hall; M P Snee; S Downes; C A Powell; J D Terrell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

Review 5.  Leukaemia and nuclear installations.

Authors:  V Beral
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

6.  Results of case-control study of leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria.

Authors:  M J Gardner; M P Snee; A J Hall; C A Powell; S Downes; J D Terrell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

Review 7.  Occupational risk factors for female breast cancer: a review.

Authors:  M S Goldberg; F Labrèche
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Cancer mortality risk among military participants of a 1958 atmospheric nuclear weapons test.

Authors:  K K Watanabe; H K Kang; N A Dalager
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Melanoma screening in a hungarian nuclear power plant.

Authors:  Veronika Tóth; Beáta Somlai; Zsófia Hatvani; József Szakonyi; István Gaudi; Sarolta Kárpáti
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Mortality among workers at a nuclear power plant in the United States.

Authors:  S Jablon; J D Boice
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.