| Literature DB >> 30946775 |
Meenakshi Thakur1,2, Vinod Bhatt3, Rakesh Kumar1,2.
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, India for two consecutive years (2015-16 and 2016-17). The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis whether different shade level and mulch type would influence the growth, flower yield and essential oil profile of R. damascena. Yield attributes viz., numbers of flowers plant-1, fresh flower weight plant-1, flower yield, and essential oil yield were significantly higher under open sunny conditions as compared to 25% and 50% shade levels. However, plants grown under 50% shade level recorded significantly higher plant height (cm), plant spread (cm) and the lowest numbers of branches as compared to control. Among mulches, black polyethylene mulch recorded significantly higher growth, and yield attributes of damask rose as compared to other mulches. Black polyethylene mulch recorded 74.5 and 39.2% higher fresh flower yield as compared to without mulch, during 2015-16 and 2016-17, respectively. Correlation studies showed a positively significant correlation between quality and quantity traits. A total of twenty-six essential oil compounds were identified which accounted for a total of 88.8 to 95.3%. Plants grown under open sunny conditions along with the applications of black polyethylene mulch produced a higher concentration of citronellol and trans-geraniol. Damask rose planted in open sunny conditions and mulched with black polyethylene sheet recorded significantly higher flower yield.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30946775 PMCID: PMC6448930 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214672
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Meteorological standard weeks (A) during growing season of damask rose (2015–2016) (B) during growing season of damask rose (2016–2017).
Fig 2Photosynthetic Active Radiation (PAR) at different time intervals during flowering season of damask rose.
Effect of shade level and mulch type on growth parameters of damask rose.
| Treatment | Plant height (cm) | Numbers of branches plant-1 | Plant spread (cm) | Leaf area index (LAI) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-S | E-W | |||||||||
| 2015–2016 | 2016–2017 | 2015–2016 | 2016–2017 | 2015–2016 | 2016–2017 | 2015–2016 | 2016–2017 | 2015–2016 | 2016–2017 | |
| Control (0% Shade) | 100.3c | 119.7c | 22.2a | 25.3a | 93.5c | 99.7c | 111.2c | 116.3 | 4.0bc | 4.8c |
| 25% Shade | 125.2b | 127.4b | 18.1b | 23.8ab | 106.9b | 112.3ab | 127.9b | 132.6 | 5.0ab | 6.3ab |
| 50% Shade | 137.4a | 144.7a | 16.9bc | 20.6c | 122.6a | 118.9a | 140.4a | 141.6 | 5.6a | 6.6a |
| SEm± | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 3.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| LSD (p ≤ 0.05) | 9.6 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 9.5 | 5.5 | NS | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| Without Mulch | 109.0c | 121.4c | 17.9 | 21.4bc | 104.2b | 96.8c | 122.2bc | 112.2c | 4.8 | 5.5 |
| Organic Mulch | 123.1ab | 131.4b | 19.3 | 23.7ab | 117.2a | 113.2b | 133.7a | 131.6b | 4.9 | 5.8 |
| Black polyethylene Mulch | 129.9a | 139.1a | 20.0 | 24.6a | 101.5bc | 120.9a | 123.5b | 146.7a | 4.8 | 6.4 |
| SEm± | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 10.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| LSD (p ≤ 0.05) | 8.9 | 4.5 | NS | 2.5 | 7.6 | 9.4 | 8.2 | 11.2 | NS | NS |
Note: N-S: North South; E-W: East West; NS: Not significant; LSD: Least Significant Difference; SEm: Standard Error of Mean;LAI: Leaf area index; Mean values with same letter in same columns do not differ significantly (p≤0.05)
Effects of shade level and mulch type on yield attributes and yield of damask rose.
| Treatment | Number of flowers plant-1 | Fresh flower weight plant-1 (g) | Flower yield (kg ha-1) Essential oil yield (kg ha-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015–2016 | 2016–2017 | 2015–2016 | 2016–2017 | 2015–2016 | 2016–2017 | 2015–2016 | 2016–2017 | |
| Control (0% Shade) | 186.7a | 131.8a | 511.3a | 381.6a | 4544.7a | 3392.4a | 2.0a | 1.5a |
| 25% Shade | 79.2b | 111.5b | 230.7b | 334.2ab | 2050.3b | 2970.3ab | 0.9b | 1.4ab |
| 50% Shade | 34.2c | 78.7c | 105.3c | 207.2c | 936.1c | 1841.4c | 0.4c | 0.9c |
| SEm± | 5.4 | 7.2 | 19.6 | 44.1 | 174.1 | 392.4 | 0.01 | 0.08 |
| LSD (p ≤ 0.05) 6.2 | 8.3 | 22.6 | 50.9 | 200.9 | 452.7 | 0.05 | 0.3 | |
| Without Mulch | 72.8c | 90.1c | 203.1c | 256.3c | 1805.0c | 2278.1c | 0.8c | 1.0c |
| Organic Mulch | 102.1b | 109.0b | 289.9b | 309.7b | 2576.7b | 2753.2b | 1.2ab | 1.3b |
| Black polyethylene Mulch | 125.2a | 122.9a | 354.3a | 356.9a | 3149.4a | 3172.7a | 1.4a | 1.5a |
| SEm± | 11.2 | 6.5 | 30.9 | 44.1 | 274.3 | 147.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| LSD (p ≤ 0.05) | 11.0 | 6.5 | 30.6 | 16.4 | 271.5 | 145.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| LSD: Interaction (S X M) | 19.1 | 11.2 | 52.9 | 28.4 | 470.3 | 252.0 | 0.2 | NS |
Note: S: Shade; M: Mulch; LSD: Least Significant Difference; SEm: Standard Error of Mean; Mean values with same letter in same columns do not differ significantly (p≤0.05)
Estimate of correlation coefficients at the phenotypic levels for quantitative and quality traits during crop season (Pooled data of two years).
| Parameters | Fresh flower weightplant-1 (g) | Plant height | Number of | N-S plant | E-W plant | Leaf area index | Essential oil | Flower yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Numbers of flowers plant-1 | 0.99 | -0.69 | 0.44 | -0.59 | -0.53 | -0.77 | 0.77 | 0.99 |
| Fresh flower weight plant-1 (g) | -0.67 | 0.45 | -0.59 | -0.51 | -0.76 | 0.77 | 0.99 | |
| Plant height (cm) | 0.14 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.89 | -0.24 | -0.67 | ||
| Numbers of branches plant-1 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.20 | 0.71 | 0.45 | |||
| N-S Plant spread (cm) | 0.94 | 0.78 | -0.08 | -0.59 | ||||
| E-W plant spread (cm) | 0.78 | -0.10 | -0.51 | |||||
| Leaf area index (LAI) | -0.33 | -0.76 | ||||||
| Essential oil content (v/w%) | 0.77 | |||||||
Note
*, **, Significant correlation with p values ≤ 0.05, ≤ 0.01, respectively.
Effect of shade level and mulch type on essential oil compounds of damask rose (Pooled data of two years).
| Area (%) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Control | 25% Shade | 50% Shade | |||||||||
| Sr. No. | Compounds | Lit. R.I | Exp.R.I | WM | OM | PM | WM | OM | PM | WM | OM | PM |
| 1 | Linalool | 1098 | 1100 | 1.1±0.5 | 1.1±0.4 | 1.5±0.1 | 0.9±0.0 | 0.8±0.1 | 1.3±0.2 | 1.3±0.3 | 1.1±0.5 | 1.2±0.1 |
| 2 | 1106 | 1115 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.2 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.5±0.2 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.5±0.4 | 0.7±0.0 | |
| 3 | Phenyl ethyl alcohol | 1110 | 1116 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.3±0.4 | 0.2±0.1 |
| 4 | 1111 | 1118 | 0.2±0.3 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.3±0.4 | 0.3±0.4 | 1.1±0.0 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.1±0.1 | |
| 5 | Terpineol | 1189 | 1191 | 1.1±0.0 | 1.0±0.3 | 1.2±0.2 | 1.0±0.0 | 0.7±0.3 | 0.9±0.2 | 0.7±0.5 | 1.0±0.1 | 0.9±0.0 |
| 6 | Citronellol | 1228 | 1238 | 40.0±0.0 | 45.5±8.5 | 40.8±2.0 | 35.5±9.1 | 43.3±0.6 | 44.2±1.0 | |||
| 7 | 1255 | 1271 | 12.6±0.4 | 13.0±8.6 | 15.1±4.0 | 15.3±10.3 | 12.8±0.1 | 15.6±0.3 | ||||
| 55.7±0.2 | 61.4±2.6 | 58.7±0.9 | 53.2±0.4 | 59.9±0.2 | 62.8±0.4 | |||||||
| 8 | Citronellyl acetate | 1354 | 1354 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.7±0.3 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.5±0.0 | 0.5±0.0 |
| 9 | Eugenol | 1356 | 1367 | 0.4±0.1 | 0.3±0.1 | 0.3±0.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 |
| 10 | Geranyl acetate | 1383 | 1383 | 2.8±0.6 | 2.4±1.0 | 2.1±0.6 | 1.2±0.1 | 1.2±0.3 | 1.8±0.8 | 2.1±1.1 | 1.0±0.5 | 1.4±0.6 |
| 11 | Methyl Eugenol | 1401 | 1401 | 0.9±0.3 | 1.0±0.2 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.9±0.1 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.8±0.1 |
| 12 | Farnesol | 1722 | 1717 | 1.4±0.5 | 1.1±0.0 | 0.9±0.1 | 1.3±0.2 | 1.2±0.5 | 0.9±0.1 | 1.2±0.3 | 1.1±0.5 | 1.0±0.2 |
| 6.3±0.3 | 5.6±0.3 | 4.8±0.3 | 3.9±0.1 | 3.8±0.2 | 4.0±0.2 | 5.0±0.2 | 3.6±0.2 | 3.9±0.1 | ||||
| 13 | Elemene | 1391 | 1396 | 0.9±0.1 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.9±0.4 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.2 | 1.4±0.6 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.5±0.0 |
| 14 | Caryophyllene | 1404 | 1420 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.9±0.1 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.0 |
| 15 | Alpha-guiaene | 1439 | 1435 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.3±0.2 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.3±0.0 | 0.1±0.1 |
| 16 | Alpha-humulene | 1454 | 1457 | 0.9±0.2 | 1.0±0.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.8±0.0 | 0.7±0.0 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.9±0.1 | 0.9±0.1 | 0.7±0.1 |
| 17 | Germacrene-D | 1480 | 1482 | 0.6±0.2 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.5±0.0 | 0.7±0.0 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.0 |
| 18 | Pentadecane | 1500 | 1500 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.7±0.0 | 0.6±0.1 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.5±0.2 | 0.5±0.0 |
| 19 | Farnesene | 1508 | 1510 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.3±0.0 | 0.3±0.0 | 0.3±0.1 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 |
| 4.0±0.1 | 4.5±0.1 | 3.0±0.1 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.5±0.04 | 3.6±0.07 | 4.9±0.02 | 3.7±0.07 | 3.2±0.04 | ||||
| 20 | Heptadecane | 1700 | 1697 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 |
| 21 | Octadecane | 1800 | 1796 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.1±0.1 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.1±0.0 |
| 22 | Nonadecene | 1870 | 1870 | 3.0±1.0 | 2.5±0.2 | 1.6±0.1 | 3.4±0.2 | 3.6±2.2 | 2.1±0.2 | 2.7±0.5 | 2.7±0.3 | 2.5±0.3 |
| 23 | Nonadecane | 1900 | 1895 | 14.5±5.8 | 12.6±0.2 | 8.9±0.1 | 14.2±1.9 | 15.1±7.5 | 9.2±0.8 | 10.3±3.3 | 10.9±4.0 | 9.5±1.1 |
| 24 | Eicosane | 2000 | 2002 | 1.4±0.6 | 1.4±0.1 | 0.9±0.1 | 1.5±0.0 | 1.7±1.0 | 1.0±0.2 | 1.0±0.3 | 1.1±0.2 | 1.0±0.0 |
| 25 | Heneicosane | 2100 | 2096 | 6.6±3.2 | 6.1±0.2 | 3.8±0.4 | 7.1±0.4 | 8.7±5.2 | 4.8±1.1 | 4.6±1.6 | 5.5±1.0 | 4.9±0.1 |
| 26 | Tricosane | 2300 | 2298 | 1.3±0.8 | 1.3±0.2 | 0.7±0.0 | 1.7±0.2 | 2.3±1.4 | 1.1±0.3 | 0.8±0.5 | 1.3±0.2 | 1.1±0.1 |
| 27.1±1.6 | 24.2±0.1 | 16.1±0.1 | 28.2±0.4 | 31.8±2.5 | 18.4±0.4 | 19.6±0.9 | 21.8±0.8 | 19.3±0.2 | ||||
| 92.8±3.9 | 95.3±0.6 | 91.4±0.1 | 94.0±0.9 | 91.9±2.0 | 93.6±2.1 | 88.8±3.5 | 91.8±2.2 | 91.1±0.3 | ||||
Note: WM: Without Mulch; OM: Organic Mulch; PM: Black polyethylene Mulch; ± values represents standard deviation of three replicates.
Fig 3Loading plot of principal component analysis (A) loading plot PC-1 (B) loading plot PC-2.
Fig 4Principal component analysis of essential oil compounds data.
Principal component 1 and Principal component 2 jointly explained 76.9% of the total variation. 0%, 25% and 50% are the shade levels, respectively, while WM, OM, PM are the mulch types viz., without mulch, organic mulch and black polyethylene mulch, respectively.
Clusters variability in major essential oil constituents (%) of damask rose as affected by shade level and mulch type.
| Sr. No. | Components | Cluster 1 | Cluster II | Cluster III | Cluster IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citronellol | 49.2 | 44.2–47.1 | 35.5–40.8 | 40.0–45.5 |
| 2 | Trans-Geraniol | 14.4 | 15.6–18.1 | 15.1–15.3 | 12.6–13.0 |
| 3 | Geranyl acetate | 2.1 | 1.0–1.6 | 1.2 | 1.7–2.8 |
| 4 | Nonadecene | 1.6 | 2.0–2.7 | 3.4–3.6 | 2.5–3.0 |
| 5 | Nonadecane | 8.9 | 9.0–10.9 | 14.2–15.1 | 11.3–14.5 |
| 6 | Heneicosane | 3.8 | 4.5–5.5 | 7.1–8.7 | 5.0–6.6 |