| Literature DB >> 30943879 |
Pierre Becker1,2,3,4,5,6, Anne-Cécile Normand1,2,3,4,5,6, Gerty Vanantwerpen1,2,3,4,5,6, Mia Vanrobaeys1,2,3,4,5,6, Roel Haesendonck1,2,3,4,5,6, Francis Vercammen1,2,3,4,5,6, Dirk Stubbe1,2,3,4,5,6, Renaud Piarroux1,2,3,4,5,6, Marijke Hendrickx1,2,3,4,5,6.
Abstract
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has emerged as a reliable method to identify fungal isolates. The success of this approach relies on the availability of exhaustive databases, but the latter were built with a focus on human pathogens. We assessed a large in-house database of reference spectra and a dedicated web application for their suitability for use in veterinary laboratories. A panel of 290 mold and yeast isolates representing 69 different fungal species was isolated from various animals (including pets, cattle, and zoo animals) and identified using both MALDI-TOF MS and conventional techniques. The performance of the 2 methods was compared, and identifications were confirmed by DNA sequencing. MALDI-TOF MS allowed distinction between some closely related species and achieved 89% correct identification at the species level. In comparison, only 60% of the isolates were correctly identified with conventional approaches. Using this online application, MALDI-TOF MS thus appears to be a relevant alternative for the identification of fungal isolates encountered by animal health professionals.Entities:
Keywords: MALDI-MS; database; fungi; identification; yeasts
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30943879 PMCID: PMC6838695 DOI: 10.1177/1040638719835577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Diagn Invest ISSN: 1040-6387 Impact factor: 1.279