Literature DB >> 30942924

Analysis of the factors involved in procedural failure: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope for patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy.

Yuki Tanisaka1, Shomei Ryozawa1, Masafumi Mizuide1, Maiko Harada1, Akashi Fujita1, Tomoya Ogawa1, Kouichi Nonaka1, Tomoaki Tashima1, Ryuichiro Araki2.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyze factors involved in procedural failure and to discuss responses to procedural failure by using the outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) carried out using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope (short SBE) in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy.
METHODS: The study sample included patients who underwent ERCP-related procedures using a short SBE between September 2011 and September 2018 at our hospital. Outcomes, including procedural success rate, were studied retrospectively to analyze the factors involved in procedural failure.
RESULTS: Analysis included 191 procedures carried out in 121 patients. Procedural success rate was 85.9% with an adverse event rate of 8.4%. Causes of procedural failure included malignant biliary obstruction (odds ratio [OR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-7.25, P = 0.02), first ERCP attempt (OR: 5.32, 95% CI: 1.30-36.30, P = 0.02), and Roux-en-Y reconstruction (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.004-0.39, P < 0.001). With regard to the response to failure, in cases of malignant biliary obstruction, reattempted short SBE-assisted ERCP was difficult because of invasion of the small intestine or papilla. A large number of these cases required alternative treatment (10 of 15 cases, 66.7%) using percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD).
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a short SBE is safe and effective, with malignant biliary obstruction being a specific cause of failure. Technical proficiency with different modalities, such as PTBD and EUS-BD, is necessary to respond to failure in these cases.
© 2019 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; factors involved in procedural failure; response to procedural failure; short-type single-balloon enteroscope; surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy

Year:  2019        PMID: 30942924     DOI: 10.1111/den.13414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  4 in total

1.  Antegrade Therapy for Management of Choledocholithiasis through Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy in a Patient with Surgically Altered Gastrointestinal Anatomy.

Authors:  Robert Dorrell; Katelyn Madigan; Swati Pawa; Rishi Pawa
Journal:  Case Rep Gastrointest Med       Date:  2020-11-12

2.  Simple transmural antegrade biopsy method for indeterminate biliary stricture using endoscopic sheath.

Authors:  Kei Yane; Kotaro Morita; Tetsuya Sumiyoshi; Mai Aoki; Masahiro Yoshida; Hideyuki Ihara; Hitoshi Kondo
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-09-14

3.  Outcomes and Loop Pattern Analysis of a Road-Map Technique for ERCP with Side-Viewing Duodenoscope in Patients with Billroth II Gastrectomy (with Video).

Authors:  Min Jae Yang; Jin Hong Kim; Jae Chul Hwang; Byung Moo Yoo; Yu Ji Li; Soon Sun Kim; Sun Gyo Lim
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-12

4.  Factors Affecting Technical Difficulty in Balloon Enteroscopy-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy.

Authors:  Naoya Izawa; Kohei Tsuchida; Keiichi Tominaga; Koh Fukushi; Fumi Sakuma; Ken Kashima; Yasuhito Kunogi; Mimari Kanazawa; Takanao Tanaka; Kazunori Nagashima; Takahito Minaguchi; Mari Iwasaki; Akira Yamamiya; Hidehito Jinnai; Akane Yamabe; Koki Hoshi; Takeshi Sugaya; Makoto Iijima; Kenichi Goda; Atsushi Irisawa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.