| Literature DB >> 33800779 |
Naoya Izawa1, Kohei Tsuchida1, Keiichi Tominaga1, Koh Fukushi1, Fumi Sakuma1, Ken Kashima1, Yasuhito Kunogi1, Mimari Kanazawa1, Takanao Tanaka1, Kazunori Nagashima1, Takahito Minaguchi1, Mari Iwasaki1, Akira Yamamiya1, Hidehito Jinnai1, Akane Yamabe1, Koki Hoshi1, Takeshi Sugaya1, Makoto Iijima1, Kenichi Goda1, Atsushi Irisawa1.
Abstract
Success rates of balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (BE-ERCP) for patients with a reconstructed intestinal tract after surgical procedures are unsatisfactory. We retrospectively investigated the factors associated with unsuccessful BE-ERCP. Ninety-one patients who had a reconstructed intestinal tract after gastrectomy or choledochojejunostomy were enrolled. Age, sex, operative method, malignancy, endoscope type, endoscopist's skill, emergency procedure, and time required to reach the papilla/anastomosis were examined. The primary endpoints were the factors associated with unsuccessful BE-ERCP selective cannulation, while the secondary endpoints were the rate of reaching the papilla/anastomosis, causes of failure to reach the papilla/anastomosis, cannulation success rate, procedure success rate, and rate of adverse events. Younger age (odds ratio, 0.832; 95% CI, 0.706-0.982; p = 0.001) and Roux-en-Y partial gastrectomy (odds ratio, 54.9; 95% CI, 1.09-2763; p = 0.045) were associated with unsuccessful BE- ERCP. The rate of reaching the papilla/anastomosis was 92.3%, the success rate of biliary duct cannulation was 90.5%, procedure success rate was 78.0%, and the rate of adverse events was 5.6%. In conclusion, Roux-en-Y partial gastrectomy and younger age were associated with unsuccessful BE-ERCP. If BE-ERCP is extremely difficult to perform in such patients after Roux-en-Y partial gastrectomy, alternative procedures should be considered early.Entities:
Keywords: Roux-en-Y anastomosis; balloon enteroscopy; biliary intervention; endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
Year: 2021 PMID: 33800779 PMCID: PMC7961549 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241