Literature DB >> 30942683

Reevaluating Point-of-Care Resources: Community Engagement in Difficult Collection Choices.

Rachel R Walden1, Nakia J Woodward1, Richard L Wallace1.   

Abstract

Rising collection costs sometimes necessitate tough decisions regarding cancellation of popular products. In 2015-2016, the East Tennessee State University Medical Library subscribed to UpToDate and DynaMed Plus, both clinical point-of-care products, with the understanding that one product would be canceled at the fiscal year end. The librarian team undertook a year-long community engagement campaign to inform library users about the pending product cancellation decision. Ultimately, DynaMed Plus was selected and UpToDate was cancelled. The campaign generated user engagement with the decision making, along with perceived benefits including increased awareness of the library's budget constraints, increased discussion of scholarly publishing, and greater faculty/student knowledge of evaluating evidence-based products.

Keywords:  Collection development; community engagement; evidence-based medicine; point-of-care resources

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30942683     DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2019.1547055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q        ISSN: 0276-3869


  2 in total

1.  Comparing the Use of DynaMed and UpToDate by Physician Trainees in Clinical Decision-Making: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Sally L Baxter; Lina Lander; Brian Clay; John Bell; Kristen Hansen; Amanda Walker; Ming Tai-Seale
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  UpToDate versus DynaMed: a cross-sectional study comparing the speed and accuracy of two point-of-care information tools.

Authors:  Glyneva Bradley-Ridout; Erica Nekolaichuk; Trevor Jamieson; Claire Jones; Natalie Morson; Rita Chuang; Elena Springall
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2021-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.