| Literature DB >> 30940196 |
Tzu-Hung Chu1,2, Yin-Hsiu Chien3, Hsiang-Yu Lin4,5, Hsuan-Chieh Liao6, Huey-Jane Ho7, Chih-Jou Lai8, Chuan-Chi Chiang6, Niang-Cheng Lin9, Chia-Feng Yang1,10, Wuh-Liang Hwu3, Ni-Chung Lee3, Shuan-Pei Lin4, Chin-Su Liu9, Rey-Heng Hu11, Ming-Chih Ho11, Dau-Ming Niu12,13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most patients with isolated methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) /propionic acidemia (PA) presenting during the neonatal period with acute metabolic distress are at risk for death and significant neurodevelopmental disability. The nationwide newborn screening for MMA/PA has been in place in Taiwan from January, 2000 and data was collected until December, 2016.Entities:
Keywords: Liver transplantation; Methylmalonic acidemia; Newborn screening; Propionic acidemia
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30940196 PMCID: PMC6444613 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1045-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Fig. 1Metabolic pathway of propionyl-CoA and methylmalonyl-CoA. Methylmalonic acidemia (MMA, MIM#251000) is caused either by a defect in methylmalonyl coenzyme A mutase (MUT, encoded by the mut gene, on chromosome 6p12.3) or by a defect in the uptake, transport or synthesis of 5’-deoxyadenosylcobalamin (AdoCbl). A disruption of the synthesis of AdoCbl is attributable either to a defect in cblA (251100), which is caused by a mutation in the MMAA gene located on chromosome 4q31, or to a defect in cblB (251110), which is caused by a mutation in the MMAB gene located on chromosome 12q24. Combined methylmalonic acidemia and homocystinuria occurs in individuals with mutations in cblC (277,400, MMACHC gene, located on chromosome 1p34), cblD (277,410, MMADHC gene, located on chromosome 2q23), and cblF (277380). Propionic acidemia (PA MIM#606054, is caused by deficiency in propionyl-CoA carboxylase (PCC), a biotin-dependent carboxylase that is present in the mitochondrial matrix. This enzyme is composed by two subunits, which are encoded by pccA, located on chromosome 3q22. 3 and pccB, located on chromosome 13q32.3
Referral criteria of three NBS centers in Taiwan
| CFOH borderline/positive | TIP borderline/positive | NTUH borderline/positive | |
|---|---|---|---|
| C3 (μM) | 6/14 | 6/12 | 4.74/8.8 (1st tier) |
| C3/C2 | 0.25/0.35 | 0.25/0.3 | 0.26 |
| mma (μM) | 4.2 (2nd tier) | Pos/Neg | 1 (2nd tier) |
The first number indicates the cutoff point for resampling, whereas the second number stands for value of immediate referral to confirmatory medical center: NTUH/Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Note in CFOH and in NTUH, a second tier of mma level would be conducted in case of high C3 and/ or C3/C2 value.In TIP, a quantitative test of mma would be performed after detection of elevated C3 or C3/C2
Classification of quality of life
| Unscheduled admissions/yr | Tube feeding | Metabolism-correcting/ immunosuppressive agents | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | ≦ 2 times | (−) | 1 |
| Mildly impaired (if any) | 3–5 | < 25% | 2–3 |
| Moderately impaired (if any) | 6–8 | 25–50% | 4–5 |
| Severely impaired (if any) | ≧9 | > 50% | ≧6 |
We revised from Morioka et al. on the classification of quality of life. Unscheduled admission is defined as any admission due to unexpected acute decompensation, infection…and etc., which was collected from hospital records. The tube feeding ratio counts the days of length of nasogastric, orogastric tube or from gastrostomy within 1 year, then divided by 365*100%, indicating the severity of feeding quality, based on the nursing records and/or the recell of the main caregiver
Initial acylcarnitine profile among MMA mutase, MMA cblB, PA and false positive patients
| False Positive ( | MMA | PA ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mut ( | cbl (n = 1) | |||
| C3 | 9.05 ± 2.74 (4.65~13.70) | 11.21 ± 3.05 (6.30~17.52) |
| 11.11 ± 2.72 (9.07~15.1) |
| C3:C2 | 0.38 ± 0.39 | 0.80 ± 0.50* (0.36~2.36) | 0.43 | 1.54 ± 1.02* (0.60~2.97) |
| Average methylmalonic acid | 45.25 ± 45.20 (11.69~122.30) | 271.16 ± 145.59* (125.8~634) | 14.8 | 0.97$ |
This table showed there is overlapping data among each group. * indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to false positive group; $ indicates significant lower compared to mutase type patients. It reveals in terms of initial C3 level, PA/ mut > false; regarding to initial C3: C2, mut/PA > false/cbl; and MMA level: mut > false/cbl > PA
Initial biochemical data of among MMA mutase, MMA cblB, PA and false positive patients upon their admission
| False positive ( | MMA | PA ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mut ( | cbl ( | |||
| ALT(IU) (0–40) | 15.00 ± 4.83 (6–21) | 43.64 ± 48.34* (11-166) | 14 | 18.00 ± 9.83a (6–30) |
| AST(IU) (5–45) | 30.5 ± 21.89 (19–92) | 98.64 ± 115.96* (19-451) | 34 | 44.50 ± 20.94a (21–69) |
| Bun(mg/dl) (7–20) | 10.67 ± 4.37 (6–18) | 13.18 ± 8.88 (2–35) | 8 | 13.08 ± 10.65 (7–29) |
| Cre(mg/dl) (0.5–1.5) | 0.23 ± 0.14 (0.1–0.39) | 0.62 ± 0.47* (0.1-2.0) | 0.42 | 0.50 ± 0.16* (0.3-0.69) |
| NH3(μg/dl) (5–150, newborn) | 70.58 ± 27.25 (35.8–132) | 388.89 ± 299.07* (92-1244) | 253 | 341.00 ± 227.28* (84-637) |
| pH value (7.40 ± 0.08) | 7.43 ± 0.08 (7.305–7.54) | 7.28 ± 0.14* (6.94-7.47) | 7.55 | 7.37 ± 0.11 (7.229–7.476) |
| HCO3 (20 ± 4) | 20.54 ± 3.19 (14.5–26.3) | 13.97 ± 6.38 (2.0–25.3) | 8.7 | 18.10 ± 4.07 (13.5–22) |
| Glycine (μM) (110–240) | 227.7 ± 52.61 (190.5–264.9) | 533.49 ± 221.21* (238-1163.5) | 148.9 | 592 ± 106.06 (84–667) |
*indicated significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to false positive group
aindicated significant difference compared to mutase type patients
Acylcarnitine profile of LT group: pre-LT and post-LT and of non-LT group
| LT(+) | Pre-LT | Post-LT | % |
|
| C3 | 14.41 ± 14.55 | 22.17 ± 8.71 | + 371.07% | 0.05 |
| C3:C2 | 2.046 ± 1.5673 | 0.9335 ± 0.3807 | −32.41% | 0.01* |
| MMA | 373.20 ± 1004.09 | 97.63 ± 63.19 | −79.99% | 0.15 |
| LT(−) | Initial | Latest | % | |
| C3 | 11.18 ± 4.27 | 51.23 ± 51.07 | + 241.55% | 0.12 |
| C3:C2 | 0.8148 ± 0.27 | 1.1 ± 0.3920 | + 34.80% | *0.04 |
| MMA | 146.93 ± 433.87 | 109.39 ± 116.76 | −17.68% | 0.20 |
*indicated significant difference compared to false positive group (p < 0.05)
In LT(+) group: Pre-LT acylcarnitine level was collected 1 month before LT. Post-LT level was recruited at 4.1 ± 0.5 year after LT. In LT(−) group: Initial level indicates value at 1 month and latest values indicates at 3.9 ± 0.7 year
Fig. 2Admission length times of MMA and PA patients before and after LT
Fig. 3Tube feeding time of MMA mut patients, displayed in percentage, before and in the 2nd year after LT
Beck Anxiety Inventory (Chinese Version) as an objective evaluation of anxiety from the main caregiver, before and at 1 year after LT
| Pre-LT | Post-LT |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMA (10 cases) | 33.4 | 27.2 | 0.001 |
| PA (1 case) | 44 | 35 | NA |
Functional assessment (DQ/IQ) of isolated MMA and PA patients, according to diagnosis before/after the initiation of NBS; and whether or not received LT
| Before era of NBS | After era of NBS | Overall | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LT (+) | 59.7 ± 15.3 (43–73, | 59.9 ± 17.9 (33–90, | 59.9 ± 16.8 (n = 14) |
| LT(−) | 26 | 50 (50,50) | 42 (n = 3) |
Seventeen patients had at least 1 DQ/IQ assessment. In this table, isolated MMA (12 patients) and 2 PA patients were analyzed as a whole. Before era of NBS, 3 MMA cases underwent LT and they were assessed at age 11 ± 3.6 (yr). In contrast, 9 MMA and 2 PA patients underwent LT after the introduction of NBS. They were assessed at age 5.9 ± 3.6 (yr). Only 3 MMA (including 1 before NBS) did not receive LT. Two of them received DQ/IQ assessment at 9.5 and 10.2 (yr). The only one MMA LT(−) case born before NBS received DQ/IQ test at 3.6 yr. and expired 1 month afterwards. The DQ/IQ difference of LT(+)/LT(−) does not reach significance (p = 0.11)
Fig. 4Functional assessment (DQ/IQ) of isolated MMA and PA patients, categorized in LT(+) and LT(−) group