| Literature DB >> 30940139 |
Maxwell G Machani1,2, Eric Ochomo3, David Sang2, Mariangela Bonizzoni4, Guofa Zhou5, Andrew K Githeko1, Guiyun Yan5, Yaw A Afrane6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physiological characteristics (age and blood feeding status) of malaria vectors can influence their susceptibility to the current vector control tools that target their feeding and resting behaviour. To ensure the sustainability of the current and future vector control tools an understanding of how physiological characteristics may contribute to insecticide tolerance in the field is fundamental for shaping resistance management strategies and vector control tools. The aim of this study was to determine whether blood meal and mosquito age affect pyrethroid tolerance in field-collected Anopheles gambiae from western Kenya.Entities:
Keywords: Age; Anopheles gambiae; Feeding status; Kenya; Pyrethroid resistance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30940139 PMCID: PMC6444593 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2746-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Comparison of knockdown curves of Anopheles gambiae with different physiological status (Age and feeding status) and population exposed to 0.05% deltamethrin (d* = days)
| Population | Fixed factor | Comparing parameters | Chi square | d.f. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bungoma | Mosquito age | |||||
| 2–5 days | Blood-fed vs. unfed | 9.08 | 5 | 0.0389 | ||
| 14–16 days | Blood-fed vs. unfed | 60.17 | 5 | < 0.0001 | ||
| Feeding status | ||||||
| Unfed | 2–5 days vs. 14–16 days | 46.70 | 5 | < 0.0001 | ||
| Blood fed | 2–5 days vs. 14–16 days | 17.19 | 4 | 0.0008 | ||
| Kisumu | Mosquito age | |||||
| 2–5 days | Blood-fed vs. unfed | 2.47 | 5 | 0.1502 | ||
| 14–16 days | Blood-fed vs. unfed | 4.76 | 5 | 0.1279 | ||
| Feeding status | ||||||
| Unfed | 2–5 days vs. 14–16 days | 9.12 | 5 | 0.0383 | ||
| Blood fed | 2–5 days vs. 14–16 days | 2.52 | 5 | 0.1508 | ||
| Bungoma vs. Kisumu | Mosquito age | |||||
| 2–5 days | Fed vs. fed | 23.99 | 5 | < 0.0001 | ||
| Unfed vs. unfed | 40.15 | 5 | < 0.0001 | |||
| 14–16 days | Fed vs. fed | 43.94 | 5 | < 0.0001 | ||
| Unfed vs. unfed | 9.53 | 5 | 0.0334 | |||
| Feeding status | ||||||
| Blood fed | 2–5 days vs. 2–5 days | 23.99 | 5 | < 0.0001 | ||
| 14–16 days vs. 14–16 days | 43.94 | 5 | < 0.0001 | |||
| Unfed | 2–5 days vs. 2–5 days | 40.15 | 5 | < 0.0001 | ||
| 14–16 d vs. 14–16 days | 9.53 | 5 | 0.0334 | |||
Fig. 1Percentage knockdown of young and old adult Anopheles gambiae during 60-min exposure to 0.05% deltamethrin. Panel a represents knockdown rates for young (2–5 days old) female mosquitoes and b knockdown rates for old (14–16 days old) female mosquitoes. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals
Coefficients (estimate) and significance of GLM analysis with Knockdown rates as dependent variable
| Term | Estimate | t value | Pr (> |t|) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 46.50 | 14.88 | < 0.0001 |
| Site [Kisumu vs. Bungoma] | 53.50 | 12.11 | < 0.0001 |
| Age [2–5 days vs. 14–16 days] | − 36.00 | − 8.15 | < 0.0001 |
| Fed status [Unfed vs. Fed] | 37.00 | 8.37 | < 0.0001 |
| Age * Fed status | 11.00 | 1.76 | 0.0827 |
| Site * Age | 34.50 | 5.52 | < 0.0001 |
| Site * Fed status | − 37.00 | − 5.92 | < 0.0001 |
| Site * Age * Fed status | − 9.50 | − 1.08 | 0.2861 |
Interactions between variates were indicated by ‘*’
Fig. 2Mortality rates of wild Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes with different age groups and feeding status following exposure to deltamethrin (0.05%). Percentage mortalities for 24 h post deltamethrin exposure are given for a Bungoma population and b Kisumu strain. Dotted lines represent upper (98%) and lower (90%) cut-offs for WHO classifications; values above the upper line indicate susceptibility and values below the lower red line indicate resistance [25]. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals
Coefficients (estimate) and significance of GLM analysis with mortality as dependent variable
| Term | Estimate | t Ratio | Prob > |t| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 87.81 | 127.63 | <0.0001 |
| Site [Bungoma vs. Kisumu] | − 12.19 | − 17.71 | <0.0001 |
| Age [2–5 days vs. 14–16 days] | − 8.19 | − 11.90 | <0.0001 |
| Fed status [fed vs. unfed] | − 7.44 | − 10.81 | <0.0001 |
| Age [2–5 days] * Fed status [fed] | − 4.44 | − 6.45 | <0.0001 |
| Site [Bungoma] * Age [2–5 days] | − 8.19 | − 11.90 | <0.0001 |
| Site [Bungoma] * Fed status [fed] | − 7.44 | − 10.81 | <0.0001 |
| Site [Bungoma] * Age [2–5 days] * Fed status [fed] | − 4.44 | − 6.45 | <0.0001 |
Interactions between variates were indicated by ‘*’
Fig. 3Enzyme activity levels (monooxygenases, β-esterases, and GSTs) measured in biochemical assays in both fields (Bungoma) population and Kisumu susceptible strain with different age groups and feeding status. Panel a represents monooxygenase activity, b esterase activity and c Glutathione S-transferase. Bars labelled with asterisks* indicates findings that are significantly different from others (Blood-fed vs. unfed individuals). The lower case letter (a) denotes a significant difference between younger unfed mosquitoes (5 days old) and Older (16 days old) unfed ones from the same populations. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals