Sanjana Marpadga1,2, Alicia Fernandez1,2, Jamie Leung3, Audrey Tang3, Hilary Seligman1,2, Elizabeth J Murphy3. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. 2. Center for Vulnerable Populations, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA. 3. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Clinics increasingly screen patients for food insecurity, but little is known about the efficacy of referring food-insecure patients to community-based food resources. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation of a tailored community food resource referral program in a safety-net diabetes clinic. METHODS: We conducted semistructured phone interviews with food-insecure patients participating in a screening and referral program in a diabetes clinic affiliated with a safety-net hospital. In this qualitative study, we describe barriers to and facilitators of successful food resource referrals from the patient's perspective. RESULTS: The prevalence of food insecurity was high (60%). Provision of written and verbal information alone about community food resources resulted in low linkage rates (0%-4%), even with individually tailored referrals. Misperceptions about eligibility, fears around government program registration, inaccessibility, lack of information retention, competing priorities, an inability to cook, stigma, and a perceived sense of stability with existing food support were major barriers to use. Personnel-guided, in-clinic enrollment to a food resource facilitated a higher connection rate (31%). DISCUSSION: Results of this study suggest that screening for food insecurity followed by a list of food resources for those screening positive may not adequately address patient barriers to using community-based food resources. For food insecurity screening programs in the clinical setting to be effective, systems must not only distribute food resource information but also assist patients in enrollment processes.
INTRODUCTION: Clinics increasingly screen patients for food insecurity, but little is known about the efficacy of referring food-insecure patients to community-based food resources. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the implementation of a tailored community food resource referral program in a safety-net diabetes clinic. METHODS: We conducted semistructured phone interviews with food-insecure patients participating in a screening and referral program in a diabetes clinic affiliated with a safety-net hospital. In this qualitative study, we describe barriers to and facilitators of successful food resource referrals from the patient's perspective. RESULTS: The prevalence of food insecurity was high (60%). Provision of written and verbal information alone about community food resources resulted in low linkage rates (0%-4%), even with individually tailored referrals. Misperceptions about eligibility, fears around government program registration, inaccessibility, lack of information retention, competing priorities, an inability to cook, stigma, and a perceived sense of stability with existing food support were major barriers to use. Personnel-guided, in-clinic enrollment to a food resource facilitated a higher connection rate (31%). DISCUSSION: Results of this study suggest that screening for food insecurity followed by a list of food resources for those screening positive may not adequately address patient barriers to using community-based food resources. For food insecurity screening programs in the clinical setting to be effective, systems must not only distribute food resource information but also assist patients in enrollment processes.
Authors: Erin R Hager; Anna M Quigg; Maureen M Black; Sharon M Coleman; Timothy Heeren; Ruth Rose-Jacobs; John T Cook; Stephanie A Ettinger de Cuba; Patrick H Casey; Mariana Chilton; Diana B Cutts; Alan F Meyers; Deborah A Frank Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: John F Steiner; Sandra H Stenmark; Andrew T Sterrett; Andrea R Paolino; Matthew Stiefel; Wendolyn S Gozansky; Chan Zeng Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Hilary K Seligman; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Andrea Lopez; Urmimala Sarkar; Jeanne Tschann; Alicia Fernandez Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-07-11
Authors: Courtney R Lyles; Michael S Wolf; Dean Schillinger; Terry C Davis; Darren Dewalt; Allison R Dahlke; Laura Curtis; Hilary K Seligman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sunny Smith; David Malinak; Jinnie Chang; Maria Perez; Sandra Perez; Erica Settlecowski; Timothy Rodriggs; Ming Hsu; Alexandra Abrew; Sofia Aedo Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2016-12-08
Authors: Sarah Polk; Kathryn M Leifheit; Rachel Thornton; Barry S Solomon; Lisa Ross DeCamp Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Alicia J Cohen; James L Rudolph; Kali S Thomas; Elizabeth Archambault; Megan M Bowman; Christine Going; Michele Heisler; Thomas P O'Toole; David M Dosa Journal: Fed Pract Date: 2020-01
Authors: Catherine Kress; Jaya Durvasula; Andrea Knievel; Amanda M Honsvall Hoefler; Lynn P Manning; Donald J Pine; Deborah Mullen; Allyson Hayward Journal: PRiMER Date: 2021-11-03
Authors: Chris Miller-Rosales; Jodi McCloskey; Connie S Uratsu; James D Ralston; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Richard W Grant Journal: Med Care Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Heng Ky Nhoung; Munish Goyal; Maria Cacciapuoti; Hannah Day; Taymour Hashemzadeh; Michelle Magee; Yumi S Jarris Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-07-03
Authors: Emilia H De Marchis; Danielle Hessler; Caroline Fichtenberg; Eric W Fleegler; Amy G Huebschmann; Cheryl R Clark; Alicia J Cohen; Elena Byhoff; Mark J Ommerborn; Nancy Adler; Laura M Gottlieb Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-10-01
Authors: Matthew J DePuccio; Jennifer A Garner; Jennifer L Hefner; Nicolette Coovert; Aaron Clark; Daniel M Walker Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2022-10-07 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Ashley R Banks; Bethany A Bell; David Ngendahimana; Milen Embaye; Darcy A Freedman; Deena J Chisolm Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 3.295