Literature DB >> 30938559

Effects of Adaptive Hearing Aid Directionality and Noise Reduction on Masked Speech Recognition for Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Jenna M Browning1, Emily Buss2, Mary Flaherty1, Tim Vallier1, Lori J Leibold1.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate speech-in-noise and speech-in-speech recognition associated with activation of a fully adaptive directional hearing aid algorithm in children with mild to severe bilateral sensory/neural hearing loss. Method Fourteen children (5-14 years old) who are hard of hearing participated in this study. Participants wore laboratory hearing aids. Open-set word recognition thresholds were measured adaptively for 2 hearing aid settings: (a) omnidirectional (OMNI) and (b) fully adaptive directionality. Each hearing aid setting was evaluated in 3 listening conditions. Fourteen children with normal hearing served as age-matched controls. Results Children who are hard of hearing required a more advantageous signal-to-noise ratio than children with normal hearing to achieve comparable performance in all 3 conditions. For children who are hard of hearing, the average improvement in signal-to-noise ratio when comparing fully adaptive directionality to OMNI was 4.0 dB in noise, regardless of target location. Children performed similarly with fully adaptive directionality and OMNI settings in the presence of the speech maskers. Conclusions Compared to OMNI, fully adaptive directionality improved speech recognition in steady noise for children who are hard of hearing, even when they were not facing the target source. This algorithm did not affect speech recognition when the background noise was speech. Although the use of hearing aids with fully adaptive directionality is not proposed as a substitute for remote microphone systems, it appears to offer several advantages over fixed directionality, because it does not depend on children facing the target talker and provides access to multiple talkers within the environment. Additional experiments are required to further evaluate children's performance under a variety of spatial configurations in the presence of both noise and speech maskers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30938559     DOI: 10.1044/2018_AJA-18-0045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  5 in total

1.  Hearing Aid Technology Settings and Speech-in-Noise Difficulties.

Authors:  Alyssa Davidson; Nicole Marrone; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Measuring open-set, word recognition in school-aged children: Corpus of monosyllabic target words and speech maskers.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Ashley R Malley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.

Authors:  Mary M Flaherty; Jenna Browning; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Auditory, Cognitive, and Linguistic Factors Predict Speech Recognition in Adverse Listening Conditions for Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Elizabeth A Walker; Meredith Spratford; Dawna Lewis; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Z Ellen Peng; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.