Literature DB >> 30937665

Stakeholder Groups' Unique Perspectives About the Attending Physician Preceptor Role: A Qualitative Study.

Jane B Lemaire1,2, Erin Nicole Miller3, Alicia J Polachek4, Holly Wong4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attending physician preceptors are accountable to many stakeholder groups, yet stakeholders' views about what the preceptor role entails have not been sufficiently considered.
OBJECTIVE: To explore stakeholder groups' unique perspectives of the preceptor role.
DESIGN: Qualitative study with a constructivist orientation. PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 73 participants from two university teaching hospitals between October 2012 and March 2014. Participants included representatives from seven stakeholder groups: patients and their families, allied healthcare providers, bedside nurses, nurse managers, medical students, internal medicine residents, and preceptors. APPROACH: An inductive thematic analysis was conducted where researchers coded transcripts, abstracted codes into themes, and then mapped themes onto six focus areas: role dimensions, role performance, stressors and rewards, mastery, fulfillment, and impact on others. Two authors then identified "recurrent themes" (emerging in two or more focus areas) and compared them across groups to identify "unique themes" (emerging from a maximum of two stakeholder groups). "Unique thematic emphases" (unique themes that would not have emerged if a stakeholder group was not interviewed) are described. KEY
RESULTS: Patients and their families emphasized preceptors' ultimate authority. Allied healthcare providers described preceptors as engaged collaborators involved in discharge planning and requiring a sense of humor. Bedside nurses highlighted the need for role standardization. Nurse managers stressed preceptors' need for humanism. Medical students highlighted preceptors' emotional labor and their influence on learners' emotional well-being. Residents emphasized preceptors' responsibilities to multiple stakeholders. Preceptors described lifelong learning and exercising control over one's environment.
CONCLUSIONS: Various stakeholder groups hold unique and nuanced views of the attending physician preceptor role. These views could broaden formal role guidance for medical education and patient care. This study generated real-world, practical examples of what stakeholders feel are important preceptor skills. These skills should be practiced, taught, and role modeled in this clinical setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health services research; medical education–faculty development; stakeholder engagement

Year:  2019        PMID: 30937665      PMCID: PMC6614296          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04950-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  26 in total

1.  Identifying oneself as a teacher: the perceptions of preceptors.

Authors:  Sarah Stone; Beth Ellers; Deborah Holmes; Rosemary Orgren; Donna Qualters; Janet Thompson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  A behavioral and systems view of professionalism.

Authors:  Cara S Lesser; Catherine R Lucey; Barry Egener; Clarence H Braddock; Stuart L Linas; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Complex adaptive systems: concept analysis.

Authors:  Lela M Holden
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 4.  What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Gary Sutkin; Elizabeth Wagner; Ilene Harris; Randolph Schiffer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Interprofessional interaction, negotiation and non-negotiation on general internal medicine wards.

Authors:  Scott Reeves; Kathleen Rice; Lesley Gotlib Conn; Karen-Lee Miller; Chris Kenaszchuk; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.338

6.  Impact of attending physician workload on patient care: a survey of hospitalists.

Authors:  Henry J Michtalik; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Peter J Pronovost; Daniel J Brotman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 7.  A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8.

Authors:  Yvonne Steinert; Karen Mann; Angel Centeno; Diana Dolmans; John Spencer; Mark Gelula; David Prideaux
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Do all health and social care professionals interact equally: a study of interactions in multidisciplinary teams in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Anita Atwal; Kay Caldwell
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2005-09

9.  Contextual tensions of the clinical environment and their influence on teaching and learning.

Authors:  Kimberly G Hoffman; Joe F Donaldson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 10.  Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  S Reeves; M Zwarenstein; J Goldman; H Barr; D Freeth; M Hammick; I Koppel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more
  1 in total

1.  Training interns in nutrition and dietetics: a cross-sectional study of the barriers and motivators to being a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist preceptor.

Authors:  Andrea M Hutchins; Donna M Winham; Jinette P Fellows; Michelle M Heer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.463

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.