Literature DB >> 30935631

Peridevice Leak After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact.

Annabelle Nguyen1, Romain Gallet2, Elisabeth Riant1, Jean-François Deux3, Madjid Boukantar2, Gauthier Mouillet2, Jean-Luc Dubois-Randé1, Nicolas Lellouche1, Emmanuel Teiger2, Pascal Lim1, Julien Ternacle4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited studies reported the rate and clinical impact of peridevice leaks (PDL) after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).
METHODS: All consecutive patients with a nonvalvular atrial fibrillation admitted for LAAC between November 2011 and October 2016 were prospectively enrolled. The follow-up included clinical, transesophageal echocardiography, and/or cardiac computed tomography angiogram (CCTA). PDL was defined by the presence of contrast within the left atrial appendage on CCTA, and Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) included stroke, device-related thrombosis, and cardiovascular death.
RESULTS: Overall, 77 patients (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score = 4.4 ± 1.5 and mean HAS-BLED = 3.4 ± 1.1) were implanted using Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (n = 24), Amulet (n = 37), or Watchman devices (n = 16). Indications were stroke recurrence despite adequate oral anticoagulation (OAC, n = 6) or contraindication to long-term OAC (n = 71). From 3-month to 12-month CCTA follow-up, the PDL rate decreased from 68.5% to 56.7% (P = 0.02), without any difference between the various devices. Patients with PDL were more often in permanent atrial fibrillation, and had a larger landing zone diameter, a lower ratio of device compression, and a more frequent off-axis position of the device. A device compression ratio < 10% was the only parameter associated with PDL occurrence. During follow-up (median 236 days) the MACE rate was 9.1%, with no statistically significant difference between patients with vs without PDL (12% vs 4.3%, P = 0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: The PDL rate detected by CCTA after LAAC was high, especially in cases with a low device compression ratio (< 10%), but decreased over time. The incidence of MACE was quantitatively greater with PDL, but the difference was not statistically significant. Larger studies are needed to determine the clinical importance of PDL.
Copyright © 2018 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30935631     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  7 in total

1.  Watchman outcomes comparing post-implantation anticoagulation with warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Ethan Fry; Harini Bollempali; Keith Suarez; Javier Banchs; Jeffrey Michel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Clinical Impact of Residual Leaks Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Insights From the NCDR LAAO Registry.

Authors:  Mohamad Alkhouli; Chengan Du; Ammar Killu; Trevor Simard; Peter A Noseworthy; Paul A Friedman; Jeptha P Curtis; James V Freeman; David R Holmes
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-04-03

3.  Design and Rationale of the Swiss-Apero Randomized Clinical Trial: Comparison of Amplatzer Amulet vs Watchman Device in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Authors:  Roberto Galea; Federico De Marco; Adel Aminian; Nicolas Meneveau; Frederic Anselme; Christoph Gräni; Adrian T Huber; Emmanuel Teiger; Xavier Iriart; Marco Angelillis; Nicolas Brugger; Alessandro Spirito; Noé Corpataux; Anna Franzone; Pascal Vranckx; Urs Fischer; Giovanni Pedrazzini; Francesco Bedogni; Stephan Windecker; Lorenz Räber; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation.

Authors:  Ali Hamadanchi; Shun Ijuin; Franz Haertel; Tarek Bekfani; Julian Westphal; Marcus Franz; Sven Moebius-Winkler; P Christian Schulze
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Value of detecting peri-device leak and incomplete endothelialization by cardiac CT angiography in atrial fibrillation patients post Watchman LAAC combined with radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Ming-Zhe Zhao; Run-Min Chi; Ying Yu; Qun-Shan Wang; Jian Sun; Wei Li; Peng-Pai Zhang; Bo Liu; Xiang-Fei Feng; Yan Zhao; Bin-Feng Mo; Mu Chen; Rui Zhang; Chang-Qi Gong; Yi-Chi Yu; Yi-Gang Li
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Temporal changes and clinical significance of peridevice leak following left atrial appendage occlusion with Amplatzer devices.

Authors:  Kasper Korsholm; Jesper M Jensen; Bjarne L Nørgaard; Jens E Nielsen-Kudsk
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.585

Review 7.  Combination of ablation and left atrial appendage closure as "One-stop" procedure in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: Current status and future perspective.

Authors:  Ben He; Li-Sheng Jiang; Zi-Yong Hao; Hao Wang; Yu-Tong Miao
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.976

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.