Jin Ho Song1, Mina Yu2, Ki Mun Kang3, Jong Hoon Lee4, Sung Hwan Kim5, Taek Keun Nam6, Jae Uk Jeong6, Hong Seok Jang7, Jeong Won Lee8, Ji-Han Jung9. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: koppul@catholic.ac.kr. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea. 9. Department of Hospital Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) in rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical data of 1,232 stage II-III rectal cancer patients from six tertiary institutions were analyzed. All patients were treated by long-course preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was performed for 962 (78.1%) patients according to the multidisciplinary team's decision. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors were evaluated according to the lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) status. RESULTS: Five-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of the entire cohort were 84.1% and 71.1%, respectively. There is a significant difference in 5-year OS among both-absent, LVI+ only, PNI+ only, and both-present groups (89.1% vs. 77.9% vs. 67.6% vs. 56.2%; p < 0.001). RFS at five years was significantly different among both-absent, LVI+ only, PNI+ only, and both-present groups (78.7% vs. 58.7% vs. 44.6% vs. 38.6%; p < 0.001). The 5-year distant failure-free survival (DFFS) rate was also significantly different among four groups (84.6% vs. 61.4% vs. 54.2% vs 48.6%; p < 0.001). Although adjuvant chemotherapy did not affect 5-year DFFS in the entire cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced the distant failure rate in patients with PNI+ patients (44.9% vs. 54.6%, p = 0.048), not LVI+ patients (65.0% vs. 56.1%, p = 0.487). CONCLUSION: Compared to LVI, PNI is a more significant prognostic factor in stage II-III rectal patients treated by preoperative CRT and TME surgery. The status of PNI rather than LVI could be an indicator for identifying patients who could benefit from adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) in rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical data of 1,232 stage II-III rectal cancerpatients from six tertiary institutions were analyzed. All patients were treated by long-course preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was performed for 962 (78.1%) patients according to the multidisciplinary team's decision. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors were evaluated according to the lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) status. RESULTS: Five-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of the entire cohort were 84.1% and 71.1%, respectively. There is a significant difference in 5-year OS among both-absent, LVI+ only, PNI+ only, and both-present groups (89.1% vs. 77.9% vs. 67.6% vs. 56.2%; p < 0.001). RFS at five years was significantly different among both-absent, LVI+ only, PNI+ only, and both-present groups (78.7% vs. 58.7% vs. 44.6% vs. 38.6%; p < 0.001). The 5-year distant failure-free survival (DFFS) rate was also significantly different among four groups (84.6% vs. 61.4% vs. 54.2% vs 48.6%; p < 0.001). Although adjuvant chemotherapy did not affect 5-year DFFS in the entire cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced the distant failure rate in patients with PNI+ patients (44.9% vs. 54.6%, p = 0.048), not LVI+ patients (65.0% vs. 56.1%, p = 0.487). CONCLUSION: Compared to LVI, PNI is a more significant prognostic factor in stage II-III rectal patients treated by preoperative CRT and TME surgery. The status of PNI rather than LVI could be an indicator for identifying patients who could benefit from adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.
Authors: Hee Jeong Cho; Jin Ho Baek; Dong Won Baek; Byung Woog Kang; Soo Jung Lee; Hye Jin Kim; Su Yeon Park; Jun Seok Park; Gyu Seog Choi; Jong Gwang Kim Journal: In Vivo Date: 2019 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.155