Andrew M Ball1,2,3, Michelle Finnegan3,4, Shane Koppenhaver5,6, Will Freres1,3, Jan Dommerholt3,4, Orlando Mayoral Del Moral7,8,9, Carel Bron10, Randy Moore11,12, Erin E Ball3,13, Emily E Gaffney14. 1. a Atrium Health , Carolinas Rehabilitation , Charlotte , NC , USA. 2. b NxtGen Institute of Physical Therapy , Atlanta , GA , USA. 3. c Myopain Seminars , Bethesda , MD , USA. 4. d ProMove PT Pain Specialists , Bethesda , MD , USA. 5. e Department of Physical Therapy , Baylor University , Dallas , TX , USA. 6. f Department of Physical Therapy , South College , Knoxville , TN , USA. 7. g Hospital Provincial de Toledo , Physical Therapy Unit , Toledo , Spain. 8. h Orlando Mayoral Clinica de fisiotherapia , Madrid , Spain. 9. i Seminarios Travell y Simons® , Toledo , Spain. 10. j Physical therapy practice for disorders of neck, shoulder and upper extremity , Groningen , Netherlands. 11. k MSK Masters , Cincinnati , OH , USA. 12. l General Musculoskeletal Imaging, Inc , Cincinnati , OH , USA. 13. m Novant Health , Charlotte , NC , USA. 14. n USA MEDDAC Guthrie Ambulatory Health Care Clinic , Fort Drum , NY , USA.
Abstract
Objectives: Prudent dry needling techniques are commonly practiced with the intent to avoid large neurovascular structures, thereby minimizing potential excessive bleeding and neural injury. Patient position is one factor thought to affect the size of the safe zone during dry needling of some muscles. This study aimed to compare the size of the needle safe zone of the iliacus muscle during two different patient positions using ultrasound imaging. Methods: The distance from the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) to the posterior pole of the femoral nerve was measured in 25 healthy participants (11 male, 14 female, mean age = 40) in both supine and sidelying positions using a Chison Eco1 musculoskeletal ultrasound unit. The average distance was calculated for each position and a two-tailed, paired t-test (α < 0.05) was used to examine the difference between positions. Results: The mean distance from the AIIS to the posterior pole of the femoral nerve was statistically greater with participants in the sidelying position (mean[SD] = 35.7 [6.2] mm) than in the supine position (mean[SD] = 32.1 [7.3] mm, p < .001). Discussion: Although more study is needed, these results suggest that patient positioning is one of several potential variables that should be considered in the optimization of patient safety/relative risk when performing trigger point dry needling. Level of Evidence: Level 4 (Pre-Post Test).
Objectives: Prudent dry needling techniques are commonly practiced with the intent to avoid large neurovascular structures, thereby minimizing potential excessive bleeding and neural injury. Patient position is one factor thought to affect the size of the safe zone during dry needling of some muscles. This study aimed to compare the size of the needle safe zone of the iliacus muscle during two different patient positions using ultrasound imaging. Methods: The distance from the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) to the posterior pole of the femoral nerve was measured in 25 healthy participants (11 male, 14 female, mean age = 40) in both supine and sidelying positions using a Chison Eco1 musculoskeletal ultrasound unit. The average distance was calculated for each position and a two-tailed, paired t-test (α < 0.05) was used to examine the difference between positions. Results: The mean distance from the AIIS to the posterior pole of the femoral nerve was statistically greater with participants in the sidelying position (mean[SD] = 35.7 [6.2] mm) than in the supine position (mean[SD] = 32.1 [7.3] mm, p < .001). Discussion: Although more study is needed, these results suggest that patient positioning is one of several potential variables that should be considered in the optimization of patient safety/relative risk when performing trigger point dry needling. Level of Evidence: Level 4 (Pre-Post Test).
Authors: Young Seok Kim; Sung Ho Park; Seung Do Ahn; Jeong Eun Lee; Eun Kyung Choi; Sang-wook Lee; Seong Soo Shin; Sang Min Yoon; Jong Hoon Kim Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Juan Antonio Valera-Calero; Ladislao Laguna-Rastrojo; Fernando de-Jesús-Franco; Eduardo Cimadevilla-Fernández-Pola; Joshua A Cleland; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; José Luis Arias-Buría Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2020-05-07