Literature DB >> 30933606

Adjusted Mortality Rates Are Lower For Medicare Advantage Than Traditional Medicare, But The Rates Converge Over Time.

Joseph P Newhouse1, Mary Price2, J Michael McWilliams3, John Hsu4, Jeffrey Souza5, Bruce E Landon6.   

Abstract

Overall mortality rates, adjusted for age, sex, and Medicaid status, in Medicare Advantage have been below those in traditional Medicare for many years. Much attention has been paid to the resulting issue of favorable selection in Medicare Advantage. The common study design used to estimate causal effects of Medicare Advantage on utilization and outcomes compares new Medicare Advantage beneficiaries immediately before and after enrollment in Medicare Advantage with beneficiaries who choose to remain in traditional Medicare. What has not been studied is the mortality experience of a cohort that initially chooses enrollment in Medicare Advantage versus one that chooses traditional Medicare. In this study we found that the adjusted mortality rate of a cohort newly enrolled in Medicare Advantage was initially well below that of a cohort newly enrolled in traditional Medicare, but the difference markedly decreased after five years. As a result, the common study design is flawed because it assumes that any initial difference in mortality risk remains constant after enrollment in Medicare Advantage. In other words, those initially choosing Medicare Advantage become sicker relative to traditional Medicare beneficiaries over five years. Whether the mortality rates would fully converge if a period longer than five years were observed is a topic for further research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; Medicare Advantage; mortality risk; selection

Year:  2019        PMID: 30933606      PMCID: PMC6555557          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  8 in total

1.  Enrollee health status under Medicare risk contracts: an analysis of mortality rates.

Authors:  G Riley; J Lubitz; E Rabey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Biased selection and regression toward the mean in three Medicare HMO demonstrations: a survival analysis of enrollees and disenrollees.

Authors:  G Riley; E Rabey; J Kasper
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Projected Coding Intensity In Medicare Advantage Could Increase Medicare Spending By $200 Billion Over Ten Years.

Authors:  Richard Kronick
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  An economic history of Medicare part C.

Authors:  Thomas G McGuire; Joseph P Newhouse; Anna D Sinaiko
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  How Does Risk Selection Respond to Risk Adjustment? New Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program.

Authors:  Jason Brown; Mark Duggan; Ilyana Kuziemko; William Woolston
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2014-10

6.  Does Part D abet advantageous selection in Medicare Advantage?

Authors:  Tony Han; Kurt Lavetti
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  New risk-adjustment system was associated with reduced favorable selection in medicare advantage.

Authors:  J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Steps to reduce favorable risk selection in medicare advantage largely succeeded, boding well for health insurance exchanges.

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Mary Price; Jie Huang; J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Relationship of neighborhood and individual socioeconomic status on mortality among older adults: Evidence from cross-level interaction analyses.

Authors:  Taehyun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Health Care Utilization, Care Satisfaction, and Health Status for Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.

Authors:  Sungchul Park; Lindsay White; Paul Fishman; Eric B Larson; Norma B Coe
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-03-02

3.  Commentary on: The effects of coding intensity in Medicare advantage on plan benefits and finances.

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Trends in Use of Low-Value Care in Traditional Fee-for-Service Medicare and Medicare Advantage.

Authors:  Sungchul Park; Jeah Jung; Robert E Burke; Eric B Larson
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

5.  Completeness of cohort-linked U.S. Medicare data: An example from the Agricultural Health Study (1999-2016).

Authors:  Christine G Parks; Srishti Shrestha; Stuart Long; Thomas Flottemesch; Sarah Woodruff; Honglei Chen; Gabriella Andreotti; Jonathan N Hofmann; Laura E Beane Freeman; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  Variation in influenza vaccine assessment, receipt, and refusal by the concentration of Medicare Advantage enrollees in U.S. nursing homes.

Authors:  Patience Moyo; Elliott Bosco; Barbara H Bardenheier; Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez; Robertus van Aalst; Ayman Chit; Stefan Gravenstein; Andrew R Zullo
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Differences in Health Care Utilization, Process of Diabetes Care, Care Satisfaction, and Health Status in Patients With Diabetes in Medicare Advantage Versus Traditional Medicare.

Authors:  Sungchul Park; Eric B Larson; Paul Fishman; Lindsay White; Norma B Coe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.178

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.