Literature DB >> 2061054

Enrollee health status under Medicare risk contracts: an analysis of mortality rates.

G Riley1, J Lubitz, E Rabey.   

Abstract

Previous studies comparing the health status of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled under HMO risk contracts to that of Medicare beneficiaries in fee-for-service (FFS) have generally focused on demonstration projects conducted before 1985. This study examines mortality rates in 1987 for approximately 1 million aged Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in 108 HMOs. We estimated adjusted mortality ratios (AMR) for each HMO and across all HMOs, by dividing the actual number of deaths among HMO enrollees by the "expected" number of deaths. The expected number of deaths was based on death rates among local FFS populations, adjusting for age, sex, Medicaid buy-in status, and institutional status. The AMR for all HMO enrollees pooled together was 0.80. For persons newly enrolled in 1987, the AMR was 0.69; in general, AMRs were higher for beneficiaries who had been enrolled for longer periods of time. Among individual HMOs, none exhibited an AMR substantially above 1.00. Regression analysis indicated lower AMRs for staff model HMOs than for either IPA or group models. Low mortality among Medicare HMO enrollees is consistent with favorable selection or with improvements in the health status of enrollees due to better access or quality of care in HMOs. In either case, health status differences between HMO enrollees and FFS beneficiaries have implications for the appropriateness of Medicare's Adjusted Average Per Capita Cost (AAPCC) payment formula for HMOs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2061054      PMCID: PMC1069817     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  28 in total

1.  Increasing Medicare enrollment in HMOs: the need for capitation rates adjusted for health status.

Authors:  J W Thomas; R Lichtenstein; L Wyszewianski; S E Berki
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Care of patients with colorectal cancer. A comparison of a health maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices.

Authors:  A M Francis; L Polissar; A B Lorenz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Health outcomes for a chronic disease in prepaid group practice and fee for service settings. The case of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  E H Yelin; M A Shearn; W V Epstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Pre-enrollment reimbursement patterns of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in "at-risk" HMOs.

Authors:  P W Eggers; R Prihoda
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1982-09

5.  Using prior utilization to determine payments for Medicare enrollees in health maintenance organizations.

Authors:  J Beebe; J Lubitz; P Eggers
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1985

6.  Functional health measure for adjusting health maintenance organization capitation rates.

Authors:  J W Thomas; R Lichtenstein
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1986

7.  Risk differential between Medicare beneficiaries enrolled and not enrolled in an HMO.

Authors:  P Eggers
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1980

8.  Adjusting Medicare capitation payments using prior hospitalization data.

Authors:  A Ash; F Porell; L Gruenberg; E Sawitz; A Beiser
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1989

9.  Evaluation of the Medicare competition demonstrations.

Authors:  K M Langwell; J P Hadley
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1989

10.  The use and costs of Medicare services in the last 2 years of life.

Authors:  J Lubitz; R Prihoda
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1984
View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparing mortality and time until death for medicare HMO and FFS beneficiaries.

Authors:  M L Maciejewski; B Dowd; K T Call; R Feldman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Understanding biased selection in Medicare HMOs.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Sally C Stearns; Edward C Norton; Thomas C Ricketts
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Adjusted Mortality Rates Are Lower For Medicare Advantage Than Traditional Medicare, But The Rates Converge Over Time.

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Mary Price; J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu; Jeffrey Souza; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Impact of continued biased disenrollment from the Medicare Advantage Program to fee-for-service.

Authors:  Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2012-01-30

5.  The effect of HMOs on the inpatient utilization of medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Nasreen Dhanani; June F O'Leary; Emmett Keeler; Anil Bamezai; Glenn Melnick
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Health status of Medicare enrollees in HMOs and fee-for-service in 1994.

Authors:  G Riley; C Tudor; Y P Chiang; M Ingber
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1996

7.  Selection experiences in Medicare HMOs: pre-enrollment expenditures.

Authors:  K T Call; B Dowd; R Feldman; M Maciejewski
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1999

8.  Varied differences in the health status between Medicare advantage and fee-for-service enrollees.

Authors:  Yunjie Song
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.