Shuichi Sato1,2, Song Gao1, Melissa J Puppa1, Matthew C Kostek1, L Britt Wilson3, James A Carson1. 1. Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC. 2. School of Kinesiology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA. 3. Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Abstract
Cancer cachexia, an unintentional body weight loss due to cancer, affects patients' survival, quality of life, and response to chemotherapy. Although exercise training is a promising intervention to prevent and treat cancer cachexia, our mechanistic understanding of cachexia's effect on contraction-induced muscle adaptation has been limited to the examination of male mice. Because sex can affect muscle regeneration and response to contraction in humans and mice, the effect of cachexia on the female response to eccentric contraction warrants further investigation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether high-frequency electric stimulation (HFES) could attenuate muscle mass loss during the progression of cancer cachexia in female tumor-bearing mice. METHODS: Female wild-type (WT) and Apc (Min) mice (16-18 wk old) performed either repeated bouts or a single bout of HFES (10 sets of 6 repetitions, ~22 min), which eccentrically contracts the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. TA myofiber size, oxidative capacity, anabolic signaling, and catabolic signaling were examined. RESULTS: Min had reduced TA muscle mass and type IIa and type IIb fiber sizes compared with WT. HFES increased the muscle weight and the mean cross-sectional area of type IIa and type IIb fibers in WT and Min mice. HFES increased mTOR signaling and myofibrillar protein synthesis and attenuated cachexia-induced AMPK activity. HFES attenuated the cachexia-associated decrease in skeletal muscle oxidative capacity. CONCLUSION: HFES in female mice can activate muscle protein synthesis through mTOR signaling and repeated bouts of contraction can attenuate cancer-induced muscle mass loss.
Cancer cachexia, an unintentional body weight loss due to cancer, affects patients' survival, quality of life, and response to chemotherapy. Although exercise training is a promising intervention to prevent and treat cancer cachexia, our mechanistic understanding of cachexia's effect on contraction-induced muscle adaptation has been limited to the examination of male mice. Because sex can affect muscle regeneration and response to contraction in humans and mice, the effect of cachexia on the female response to eccentric contraction warrants further investigation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether high-frequency electric stimulation (HFES) could attenuate muscle mass loss during the progression of cancer cachexia in female tumor-bearing mice. METHODS: Female wild-type (WT) and Apc (Min) mice (16-18 wk old) performed either repeated bouts or a single bout of HFES (10 sets of 6 repetitions, ~22 min), which eccentrically contracts the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. TA myofiber size, oxidative capacity, anabolic signaling, and catabolic signaling were examined. RESULTS: Min had reduced TA muscle mass and type IIa and type IIb fiber sizes compared with WT. HFES increased the muscle weight and the mean cross-sectional area of type IIa and type IIb fibers in WT and Min mice. HFES increased mTOR signaling and myofibrillar protein synthesis and attenuated cachexia-induced AMPK activity. HFES attenuated the cachexia-associated decrease in skeletal muscle oxidative capacity. CONCLUSION:HFES in female mice can activate muscle protein synthesis through mTOR signaling and repeated bouts of contraction can attenuate cancer-induced muscle mass loss.
Authors: Marcas M Bamman; Vernishia J Hill; Gregory R Adams; Fadia Haddad; Carla J Wetzstein; Barbara A Gower; Ali Ahmed; Gary R Hunter Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Rose Njemini; Louis Nuvagah Forti; Tony Mets; Evelien Van Roie; Walter Coudyzer; Ingo Beyer; Christophe Delecluse; Ivan Bautmans Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Justin P Hardee; Joshua E Mangum; Song Gao; Shuichi Sato; Kimbell L Hetzler; Melissa J Puppa; Dennis K Fix; James A Carson Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2015-10-22
Authors: Marco Sandri; Jiandie Lin; Christoph Handschin; Wenli Yang; Zoltan P Arany; Stewart H Lecker; Alfred L Goldberg; Bruce M Spiegelman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-10-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Melissa J Puppa; James P White; Kandy T Velázquez; Kristen A Baltgalvis; Shuichi Sato; John W Baynes; James A Carson Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: Bridget M Deasy; Aiping Lu; Jessica C Tebbets; Joseph M Feduska; Rebecca C Schugar; Jonathan B Pollett; Bin Sun; Kenneth L Urish; Burhan M Gharaibeh; Baohong Cao; Robert T Rubin; Johnny Huard Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2007-04-09 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Georgios Mavropalias; Marc Sim; Dennis R Taaffe; Daniel A Galvão; Nigel Spry; William J Kraemer; Keijo Häkkinen; Robert U Newton Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 4.322