Skeletal muscle wasting in cachexia and sarcopenia: molecular pathophysiology and impact of exercise training.

Skeletal muscle is the most abundant tissue in the human body, and the maintenance of its mass is essential to ensure basic function as locomotion, strength and respiration. The decision to synthesize or to break down skeletal muscle proteins is regulated by a network of signaling pathways that transmit external stimuli to intracellular factors regulating gene transcription. The tightly regulated balance of muscle protein breakdown and synthesis is disturbed in several distinct myopathies, but also in two pathologies: sarcopenia and cachexia. In recent years, it became evident that in these two muscle wasting disorders specific regulating molecules are increased in expression (e.g. members of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, myostatin, apoptosis inducing factors), whereas other factors (e.g. insulin-like growth factor 1) are down-regulated. So far, not many treatment options to fight the muscle loss are available. One of the most promising approaches is exercise training that, due to its multifactorial effects, can act on several signaling pathways. Therefore, this review will concentrate on specific alterations discussed in the current literature that are present in the skeletal muscle of both muscle wasting disorders. In addition, we will focus on exercise training as an intervention strategy.

Introduction

Skeletal muscle comprises a system that represents the largest organ of the human body. As it consists of over 600 separate muscles it is the major reservoir of body proteins and takes up to 50% of the total body weight. Its main functions are not only to provide movement, strength and respiration but also to balance posture and to regulate the body temperature. Besides distinct myopathies there are two pathologies of muscle wasting which are of general interest, namely sarcopenia and cachexia.

Sarcopenia, meaning poverty of flesh, is the degenerative unintentional loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength associated with aging [1]. It is estimated that the prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults is approximately 25% [2], and there is a loss of 5% of muscle mass per decade of life from the fourth decade onwards, potentially increasing after the age of 65 years [3, 4]. From a histological point of view, sarcopenia is characterized by a decrease in the number and the size of the muscle fibers.

Cachexia is a complex metabolic syndrome associated with underlying illness and characterized by loss of muscle with or without loss of fat mass [5]. Cachexia typically manifests in chronic diseases such as cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic kidney disease [6] (CKD) (Fig. 1). The prominent clinical feature of cachexia is weight loss in adults (corrected for fluid retention) or growth failure in children (excluding endocrine disorders). The key component was at least a 5% loss of edema-free body weight during the previous 12 months or less.

Fig. 1

Schematic drawing of aetiological factors leading to cachexia or sarcopenia and finally to muscle wasting. Exercise training as an intervention is able to modify this course

A major barrier to effective management of skeletal muscle wasting is the inadequate understanding of its underlying biological mechanisms. Therefore, in this review, we will concentrate on specific alterations discussed in the current literature that are present in the skeletal muscle of both muscle wasting disorders. In addition, we will focus on exercise training as a strategy to intervene with these alterations.

Protein catabolism/anabolism—ubiquitin proteasome system and autophagy

The most evident metabolic explanation for muscle decline is an imbalance between protein catabolism and anabolism. At least four major proteolytic pathways (lysosomal, Ca2+-dependent, caspase-dependent and ubiquitin–proteasome-dependent) operate in skeletal muscle, and may be altered in the process of sarcopenia and muscle cachexia. Aside from these four distinct pathways, the autophagic/lysosomal pathway also has to be considered. In this pathway, portions of the cytoplasm and cell organelles are sequestered into autophagosomes, which subsequently fuse with lysosomes, where the proteins are digested [7]. Dissecting the molecular regulation of the ubiquitin–proteasome-dependent system (UPS) and autophagy it became evident that forkhead box O (FoxO) transcription factors take a central position. FoxO transcription factors, normally phosphorylated and inactivated by PI3K-Akt/PKB, translocate into the cell nucleus and induce the transcription of the skeletal muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligases, MuRF1 and MAFbx/atrogin [8], as well as autophagy-related genes like LC3 and Bnip3 [9]. Upstream of PI3K-Akt, several factors like reactive oxygen species (ROS), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), the tumor-released proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF), the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1α) or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) have been shown to influence this regulatory system [8, 10–12].

On the other hand, protein anabolic factors like IGF-1 are counteracting muscle atrophy. Besides inhibiting autophagy and the UPS, IGF-1 activates via Akt–mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin)–p70S6K (p70 S6 kinase) protein synthesis [13, 14].

Sarcopenia

Experimental and human studies in the last decade clearly demonstrated that UPS is activated in several muscle wasting conditions (reviewed by Mitch and Goldberg [15]). However, data on muscle wasting by the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) in aging are conflicting. Several authors described an up-regulation of components of the UPS in sarcopenia [16-18], whereas others found a down-regulation [19-21] or no change [22]. Therefore, at least in sarcopenia, the UPS seems not to be the major pathway responsible for muscle loss.

Calpains belong to a large family of calcium-dependent cystein proteases, and demonstrate a ubiquitous or tissue-specific expression [23]. Besides its regulation by calcium, calpain activity is tightly controlled by its inhibitor calpastatin [24]. In an animal study comparing the mRNA expression of calpains and calpastatin in the skeletal muscle of 3- and 24-month-old rats, a 38% increase in μ-calpain and a 28% decrease in calpastatin in the old specimens was evident [25]. In addition, these changes at the expression levels were confirmed by calpain activity measurements. At least, these animal data point to a possible involvement of the calpains in muscle loss during ageing. Nevertheless, this has to be confirmed in human muscle biopsies, and further experiments have to elucidate the physiological targets of calpains in sarcopenia.

Lysosomes are responsible for the degradation of long-lived proteins and for the enhanced protein degradation observed under starvation conditions. Using a gene expression profile analysis from young (3–4 months) and old (30–31 months) rats, Pattison and colleagues [26] described a slight up-regulation of cathepsin L in the old soleus muscle. Nevertheless, this result could not be confirmed in a later study by O’Connell et al. [27], who screened for differentially expressed protein in the gastrocnemius muscle of 30- and 3-month-old rats. Data for the direct analysis of lysosomal components in young vs. old skeletal muscle are missing.

At least in transgenic mice overexpressing IGF-1 specifically in the skeletal muscle, it was evident that the age-related sarcopenia was prevented [28]. Furthermore, it is well known that post-maturational aging is associated with reduced serum IGF-1 concentration. This finding was supported by detecting a reduced expression level in the skeletal muscle of older men when compared to younger ones [29, 30]. Unfortunately, no correlation between muscle mass or protein synthesis rate was found [30], whereby the functional significance of the alterations are uncertain.

Cachexia

The UPS is the major proteolytic machinery systematically activated in cachexia. To assess the role of the UPS in cancer cachexia, Williams and colleagues [31] took biopsies of cancer and non-cancer patients undergoing laparotomy for various reasons. The mRNA levels for ubiquitin and the 20 S proteasome subunits were two to four times higher in muscle from patients with cancer than in muscle from control patients.

In a report by Lecker et al. [32], muscles atrophying from different causes (cancer cachexia, streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus, uremia induced by subtotal nephrectomy, and from pair-fed control rats) were investigated. Proteins involved in protein degradation, including polyubiquitins, Ub fusion proteins, the Ub ligases atrogin-1/MAFbx and MuRF-1, multiple but not all subunits of the 20 S proteasome and its 19 S regulator, and cathepsin L were up-regulated [32].

In a cancer cachexia animal study by Acharyya and coworkers [33] it was demonstrated that myosin heavy chain (MyHC) is a selective target associated with a wasting state compared to other myofibrillar proteins [33]. MyHC protein was significantly reduced, whereas MyHC mRNA levels were unchanged. Results showed that the mature form of MyHC could readily be immunoprecipitated with ubiquitin, which supports the involvement of this proteolytic pathway in the basal turnover of myosin.

The important role of the FoxO transcription factors was underlined in a study by Liu et al. [34] when they targeted Foxo-1 in a cancer cachexia mice model by an oligonucleotide. It could be demonstrated that the RNA oligonucleotide can reduce the expression of Foxo-1 in normal and cachectic mice, leading to an increase in skeletal muscle mass of the mice. In the search for downstream target genes of Foxo-1, increased levels of MyoD and decreased concentrations of myostatin were found.

Investigating the UPS and the lysosomal proteolytic pathway in lung cancer patients, Jagoe and colleagues reported that mRNA levels for cathepsin B, but not for components of the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway, were higher in patients with cancer compared with controls suggesting that cathepsin B may have a role in inducing muscle wasting in the early stages of lung cancer [35].

Besides an increased catabolism, there is reduced anabolism, which has been shown, for example in cancer-related cachexia. Although the underlying mechanism remains unknown, it could be demonstrated that the IGF-1 system is down-regulated in an animal model of cancer cachexia [36]. Interestingly, the transgenic overexpression of locally acting IGF-1 in skeletal muscle inhibits ubiquitin-mediated muscle atrophy in chronic left-ventricular dysfunction [37].

In cancer cachexia, in particular, the decrease in skeletal muscle protein synthesis is partly related to the increased serum level of the PIF. Intravenous administration of PIF to normal mice produced a rapid decrease in body weight that was accompanied by increased mRNA levels for ubiquitin in the gastrocnemius muscle [11]. There were also increased protein levels of the 20 S proteasome core and 19 S regulatory subunit, suggesting activation of the ATP–ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway. Recent evidence proposes that PIF decreases protein synthesis by inhibiting protein translation initiation through phosphorylation of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2-alpha) [38].

Another factor that may contribute to a decreased anabolism is angiotensin II. In an animal model of continuously administered angiotensin II, a markedly reduced plasma IGF I levels occurred [39]. Compared with sham, angiotensin II-infused hypertensive rats lost 18–26% of body weight by 1 week, which was completely reversible by losartan, an AT1 receptor antagonist.

Oxidative stress—ROS

Oxidative stress is a state wherein the normally well-balanced control of oxidant production and antioxidant capacity is disturbed. The sources of oxidants are numerous and include enzymatic and chemical reactions producing superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxides or nitric oxide. Once produced, these molecules can interact with each other to form even more highly reactive products like peroxynitrite (ONOO-) or hydroxyl radicals (OH.). At basal levels these molecules fulfill important signaling tasks, but when the concentration rises above a certain level detrimental effects like alterations of lipids, proteins and even DNA are overwhelming. There is plenty of evidence in the current literature that oxidative stress is associated with chronic diseases, and it is assumed that an increase in ROS directs muscle cells into a catabolic state leading to muscle wasting [40-42]. At least from cell culture experiments mainly performed in C2C12 cells, it is well documented that ROS have the potency to induce the expression of E3-ubiquitin ligases [43], correlating with an increased ubiquitin-conjugating activity and proteasome activity and decreased myosin protein [43, 44]. In addition, oxidative stress is a potent inducer of apoptotic cell death [45].

The free radical theory of aging formulated more than 50 years ago proposes that aging and associated degenerative diseases can be attributed to the effect of ROS [46]. A current version of this theory is the oxidative stress theory of aging, stating that a chronic state of oxidative stress even exists under normal conditions and is increased with aging due to an imbalance of generation and detoxification of ROS [47]. An elegant method to estimate the load of oxidative stress is the measurement of protein modifications, like carbonylation or nitration. Using this approach, Feng and coworkers could demonstrate a significant up-regulation of carbonylated proteins of mitochondria from older (26 months) vs. younger (12 months) Fisher 344 rats [48]. This is further supported by several studies linking the amount of carbonylated protein with muscle strength [49]. The other marker for increased oxidative stress is 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT). This posttranslational modification can alter protein function and activity, and is formed when tyrosine residues are nitrated by peroxynitrite [50]. A case-control study measuring 3-NT immunoreactivity in external intercostals and quadriceps muscle obtained from elderly and young individuals revealed a significant increase in the elderly [51]. In animal studies, 3-NT was evaluated in muscles from young, adult and old rats [52-54]. A significant age-associated increase in nitrotyrosine-modified proteins involved in metabolism, contraction and calcium homeostasis was observed. This increase of oxidative stress in the aged skeletal muscle may be due to a reduction in the detoxification system due to a lower expression/activity of Mn-SOD or catalase [51, 55].

Also, in cachexia, ROS are regarded as crucial players for muscle protein catabolism by stimulating the UPS. As mentioned above, reaction products are measured as indirect markers for oxidative stress. In cachexia, malondialdehyde (MDA) is regarded as such indirect marker. In an animal study, a significantly increased level of MDA in muscles from cachectic MAC16 mice was detected, when compared with control non-tumor-bearing animals [44]. In addition, experimental cancer cachexia appears to be mediated by increased nitrosative stress secondary to increased nitric oxide formation. Indeed, protein tyrosine nitration is markedly increased in the muscles of tumor bearing rats with advanced cachexia [56]. Also, in cachexia, this increase in ROS is due to significantly lower activities of antioxidant enzymes: superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase [57].

Inflammation

Since the influential report of elevated levels of TNF-α in patients with cardiac cachexia, it has become clear that pro-inflammatory cytokines play an important role in the evolvement of cachexia and other muscle wasting disorders [58]. TNF-α either on its own or in combination with other cytokines can induce the breakdown of mature myotubes [59, 60]. For example TNF-α and IFN-γ act synergistically not only to inhibit the activation of messenger RNA for MyHC synthesis, but also for stimulating the proteolysis of this protein [33]. With respect to the UPS, cell culture studies revealed that TNF-α in particular is a potent stimulator of MuRF1 and MAFbx expression [61, 62]. Based on animal experiments, it even seems that MuRF1 is essential for TNF-α-induced loss of muscle function [63].

Exposure of myocytes to TNF-α rapidly activates the transcription factor NF-κB, which in turn inhibits muscle cell differentiation by suppressing the synthesis of MyoD, thereby influencing muscle regeneration (see below). It should be noted that the activation of NF-kB is also involved in the up-regulation of cytokine synthesis, which can contribute to paracrine effects of cytokines on skeletal muscle tissue as described above.

Thus, cytokine-induced skeletal muscle wasting is probably a multifactorial process, involving increased protein degradation and reduced myocyte regeneration and repair [64].

There is growing evidence that higher levels of inflammatory markers are associated with physical decline in older persons, possibly through the catabolic effects of inflammatory markers on muscle. In an observational study of more than 2,000 men and women, TNF-α showed a consistent association with the decline in muscle mass and strength [65]. The impact of inflammation in the development of sarcopenia is furthermore supported by a recently published animal study showing that reduction of low-grade inflammation by ibuprofen in old (20 months) animals resulted in a significant decreased muscle mass loss [66]. The loss of muscle mass in the situation of low-grade inflammation is possibly due to a loss of stimulation in protein synthesis by food intake with an unaltered rate of protein degradation [67].

TNF-α, interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6 and IFN-γ have been implicated in the induction of cancer-related muscle wasting [68]. There is growing evidence that the accelerated muscle proteolysis during malignant tumor growth is mediated via the activation of the non-lysosomal adenosine triphosphate-dependent (ATP-dependent) ubiquitin proteasome pathway [31, 69]. In addition, inflammatory cytokines influence the expression of functionally relevant enzymes in cardiac cachexia. It has been demonstrated that TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL1-β, which are known to be increased in cachectic patients, are potent activators of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression [70], which in turn produces toxic levels of NO high enough to inhibit key enzymes of the oxidative phosphorylation. It could be shown in vitro that NO is able to impair the contractile performance of the skeletal muscle [71].

Regenerative capacity and cell death

Adult muscle contains a pool of undifferentiated cells located between the basal lamina and the plasma membrane with the capacity to proliferate and differentiate only when required. These cells were first identified in the frog skeletal muscle and designated ‘satellite cells’ [72]. They are responsible for pre- and postnatal muscle growth, and are capable of repairing skeletal muscle fibers following injury. The proliferative life span of human satellite cells is limited with the potential number of cell divisions decreasing considerably as a function of donor age [73]. The differentiation of myogenic cells is under the control of the MyoD family of transcription factors, including MyoD, myogenin, Myf5 and MRF4 [74]. In the quiescent state of the satellite cells MyoD expression is absent, but as soon as they are activated by external stimuli they start to proliferate with high levels of MyoD in their nuclei [75]. Using yeast two-hybrid screens, an interaction between MAFbx and MyoD was evident, suggesting that MyoD is ubiquitinated by the atrophy-related E3 ubiquitin ligase MAFbx and subsequently degraded by the proteasome system [76].

Another factor regulating the regenerative capacity of the skeletal muscle is myostatin, a member of the transforming growth factor (TGF-β) superfamily. This relation was first evident in myostatin knockout mice, exhibiting an improved healing after a myotoxic injury [77]. Dissecting the molecular pathway, it became evident that myostatin influences satellite cell proliferation and differentiation through the down-regulation of Pax7 [78], an important factor of satellite cell proliferation [79]. Besides the regulation of satellite cell differentiation via MyoD, increased oxidative stress also impairs the regenerative capacity of these cells [80]. Therefore, in the case of muscle atrophy with an up-regulation of MuRF1/MAFbx and an elevated oxidative stress, the regenerative capacity of satellite cells is also impaired.

Regarding muscle atrophy, the loss of skeletal muscle myocytes via the energy-dependent programmed cell death apoptosis also needs to be considered. Apoptosis is well known to play an important physiological role during embryogenic development and in the control of cell number in proliferative tissue. A central component of the signal mechanism leading to apoptotic cell death is the activation of a series of caspases [81]. In particular, the activation of caspase-3 seems to be an initial step triggering accelerated muscle proteolysis in catabolic conditions [82, 83]. Sequentially, the activation of caspase-3, potentially regulated via PI3K [83], disassociates actomyosin complexes as a rate-limiting step, before the UPS can degrade the contractile proteins of the muscle [83].

Studies investigating the age-related concentration of satellite cells have produced diverging results. In one of the first studies performed, Snow [84] reported a decrease in satellite cells from 4.6% at 8 months of age to 2.4% at 30 months. Subsequent studies have either confirmed this result [85, 86] or have found no change with aging [87, 88]. Based on these discrepant results, it was suggested to focus more on function instead of the pure amount of the satellite cells in a given muscle. Analyzing the activation of satellite cells by nitric oxide or stretch in cell culture obtained from mice at different age revealed that satellite cells are increasingly refractory to an activation in aged mouse-muscle cultures [89]. An increase in oxidative stress, due to an imbalance in the antioxidative system may be partially responsible for the age-dependent decline in satellite function [90]. As discussed above, myostatin is an important factor regulating satellite cell proliferation and differentiation. Comparing the results published in the current literature, the relevance of myostatin for age-related muscle atrophy is unclear. Some authors describe no age-related change in myostatin expression, whereas others describe a significant up- or even down-regulation at the mRNA and/or protein level [30, 91–94]. With respect to the association of apoptosis/apoptosis related proteins and sarcopenia, the data currently available are more solid. An often used animal model to investigate sarcopenia is the Fischer 344 Brown Norway rat. Using either the release of mitochondrial cytochrom c [95], or TUNEL staining [96], or caspase- and caspase-9 activity [96, 97], or DNA fragmentation [97, 98] as marker for apoptosis, apoptosis was significantly increased in older animals when compared to younger rats.

At least for sarcopenia, the involvement of skeletal apoptosis seems to be proven, whereas the participation of satellite cells and myostatin needs further investigations.

As pointed out above, experimental data suggest that local IGF-1 may act as a regenerative agent, promoting recruitment of stem cells to sites of muscle injury [99]. As IGF-1 is reduced in experimental cachexia [36], it is reasonable to assume that in the cachectic situation the function of satellite cells is impaired. Other factors controlling the differentiation of satellite cells to functional fibers are nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) and myostatin. Data are available demonstrating a beneficial effect of myostatin inhibition in cancer cachexia [100], but negative study results are also reported [101].

With respect to apoptosis, several reports demonstrated an increase in apoptosis or apoptosis-related protein in skeletal muscle after induction of cachexia. The skeletal muscle of cachectic tumor-bearing animals reveals the activation of DNA fragmentation, a hallmark of apoptosis [102]. These results from animal experiments could be confirmed in muscle biopsies from weight-losing patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer, where a significant increase in muscle DNA fragmentation (threefold) was documented [103]. In addition to DNA fragmentation, a significant up-regulation of caspase-1, -3, -6, -8, and -9 activity could also be documented in the gastrocnemius muscle of tumor-bearing mice [104].

Taken together, it seems that in cachexia and sarcopenia similar mechanisms are activated or deactivated to shift the balance towards protein breakdown, finally leading to a loss of muscle mass (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2

Schematic drawing of factors involved in regulating muscle mass (a) and the impact of exercise training on these factors (b). Factors influenced by exercise training are shaded in grey

Anabolic steroids

Testosterone and testosterone derivatives are steroid hormones that exert their effects through binding to cytosolic receptors, which leads to an increase in protein synthesis and muscle mass [105]. Testosterone effects on skeletal muscle mass are dose-dependent, with administration of supraphysiological doses leading to a substantial increase in muscle size and strength. Interestingly, studies determining the effects of testosterone on muscle performance showed that testosterone administration is associated with an increase in leg power and strength but showed no change in muscle fatigability and no change in specific tension, indicating that testosterone-induced gains in muscle strength are reflective of an increase in muscle mass [106]. The increase in muscle mass is hypertrophic growth, as it is associated with an increase in myofiber cross-sectional area, observed both in type I and type II myofibers [107], and is not due to an increase in the number of myofibers. In addition, no change is observed in the number of fibers per unit of muscle; however, an increase in myonuclear number is apparent and is hypothesized to be attributable to fusion with satellite cells [107].

Among the hormonal changes that might be related to aging, a primary role is likely exerted by the aging-related deficit of anabolic hormones, promoting a milieu that favours catabolism. This aging-related deficiency in anabolic hormone milieu takes several different forms, being relatively sudden and dramatic in the case of estrogen (E2) in women, although being more gradual and steady for testosterone (Te) in men, and dihydroepiandosterone (DHEA) and growth hormone in both genders.

Numerous studies have been performed during the past years with different outcomes. Some have reported modest increases in lean mass [108, 109]. Some have reported increased grip strength [110, 111] and others did not [109, 112, 113]. Several studies have addressed the question of whether testosterone replacement increases lower body strength [108–110, 113–115]. with only two obtaining substantial positive results [115, 116]. Nevertheless, the magnitude of strength increases, although substantial, is lower than what can be achieved through resistance exercise training.

There is a relative deficiency or resistance to anabolic hormones in cachectic states. Up to 50% of men with metastatic cancer prior to chemotherapy can present with low concentrations of testosterone [117]. A reduction in testosterone might lead to a reduced bone mass, muscle strength and sexual function in both men and women [118, 119]. Based on these and several other observations, Evans and colleagues [5] have suggested a new definition and pathophysiology for cachexia. Low concentrations of testosterone and other anabolic hormones are major contributors to cachexia related wasting of skeletal muscle [5]. However, with respect to a correlation of body composition including muscle mass and the concentration conflicting results were reported in the current literature. Some studies found a correlation [117, 120], whereas others reported no association [121].

Impact of exercise training

Although it is increasingly recognized that exercise training seems to be a poly-pill against the dramatic changes in the skeletal muscle in cachexia, scientific proof is scarce. As a matter of fact, there are only very few clinical trials investigating the impact of exercise training in cachexia. A few small studies have shown that exercise training leads to changes in body composition. Investigations with larger cohorts and hard end points are still missing. Most of the research concerning exercise training and cachexia has been done in the field of cancer cachexia, preferably with animal models. Therefore, the majority of data covers this entity. However, as there are numerous similarities in the pathophysiology of cachexia regardless of its origin, these facts might be applicable to other facets of this syndrome.

With respect to sarcopenia, exercise training is the most effective and safe intervention to attenuate or recover some of the loss of muscle mass and strength that accompanies aging (reviewed by Jones et al. [122]).

Mode of exercise training and obvious effects

There are mainly two different types of exercise training: endurance and resistance exercise training. Since the early 1980 s, nurse researchers and others have shown that endurance exercise has beneficial effects in cancer patients. Several reports propose that endurance training can ameliorate cancer related fatigue. In various studies, self-reported fatigue could be significantly reduced by different types of endurance training [123, 124]. Furthermore, it could be demonstrated that endurance training led to an improved physical capacity in cancer patients [123, 125]. Additional evidence for the beneficial role of endurance exercise has been provided by data generated from animal studies of experimental tumor-bearing rodents [126, 127]. Endurance training such as running, treadmill walking, and swimming have been associated with smaller tumors and greater food consumption. Endurance exercise was associated with an increase in muscle protein synthesis and in muscle to body weight ratio. It should be emphasized, however, that the exercised animals had smaller tumors and consumed more food compared to the sedentary tumor-bearing animals. Therefore, it is not clear whether the observed positive change in muscle protein metabolism was a consequence of smaller tumors and higher food intake or a consequence of a direct effect of the exercise on the muscles. Besides these animal studies, four studies examined the effects of resistance training on skeletal muscle mass and/or strength in patients with cancer. Two studies investigated the effect of resistance training in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy [128, 129]. Women in the resistance training group had a significant increase in lean muscle mass compared to the control group with no effects. Unfortunately, these results cannot be generalized to patients having cancer related skeletal muscle wasting as breast cancer is not typically associated with this syndrome. The other two studies observed the effects of resistance training in patients with androgen deprivation therapy due to prostate cancer. In both studies, resistance training prevented loss of muscle mass and strength seen in patients without exercise training [130, 131]. Nevertheless, because of the small amount of clinical trials, it is difficult to make general conclusions about the effect of resistance training in patients with cachexia due to cancer or other catabolic states.

With respect to exercise training in the elderly, endurance training has a broad application, improving body composition and insulin sensitivity, but with minor effects for strength and muscle mass. In a recently performed randomised study, the different responses to eccentric and concentric training in older men and women were anlyzed [132]. The authors concluded that resistance and endurance training are beneficial for the elderly with regard to muscle function and structural improvements.

Molecular biological effects of exercise training

But what are the effects of exercise training within the muscle? The anabolic effects of exercise training may be mediated by cytokines, namely, IL-6. This proinflammatory cytokine is released by muscle contraction in healthy individuals as well as diseased patients for example with prostate cancer or muscle wasted COPD [133, 134]. It exerts anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the production of TNF-α and IL-1 in vitro, and is reducing the amount of circulating TNF-α [135, 136]. Additionally, exercise training seems to have effects on the antioxidative capacity as it increases the activity of radical scavenger enzymes [137].

Another mechanism of exercise training seems to be mediated via PGC-1α. Increased muscular activity induces PGC-1α production, which in turn protects skeletal muscle from atrophy by suppressing FoxO3 action and atrophy-specific gene transcription [12]. Recently, it has been shown that progressive resistance training may increase muscle protein synthesis by increasing the phosphorylation of mTOR and p70S6k [138, 139]. One acute bout of resistance exercise resulted in significant phosphorylation of mTOR in the plantaris and tibialis anterior muscle of rats. In a healthy young man, an acute bout of low-intensity exercise enhanced mTOR signalling in the vastus lateralis muscle. This was associated with an increased protein synthesis within the skeletal muscle. It has also been shown that both resistance and endurance training blunted the increase in disease-induced muscle proteolysis and improved phosphorylation of Akt and the forkhead transcription factor FoxO1 in a mice model of CKD [140]. Resistance training, but not endurance exercise, corrected protein synthesis and levels of mediators of protein synthesis such as phosphorylated mTOR and p70S6K in the muscles of mice with CKD. Additionally, in these mice, muscle progenitor cell number and activity, as measured by the amounts of MyoD, myogenin and eMyHC mRNAs, were increased.

Another factor influenced by exercise training is myostatin. In an animal model of CHF, we documented a reduction of myostatin concentration after 4 weeks of endurance training in skeletal and heart muscle compared to sham operated animals who underwent exercise [141]. A recently published study reported that exercise training in cachectic and non-cachectic patients with COPD led to an increased IGF-mRNA and protein expression and an increased MyoD concentration. Interestingly, myostatin was down-regulated at mRNA and protein level only in non-cachectic patients [142]. Surprisingly, no effect on TNF-α expression could be detected, but the activation of the transcription factor NFκB was decreased in both groups. MafBx and MuRF-1 expression was increased in cachectic COPD, but it was decreased in non-cachectic patients.

To summarize these data, exercise training is acting in a variety of modes (Fig. 2b), of which the majority is possibly still unknown. Looking at all the collected data, it is impossible to comment on the importance of each affected pathway. They all seem to interact with each other, also depending finally on the genotype of the individual patient. As exercise training has its positive effects, we need to underline this with hard data to put it on a scientific basis and be able to offer it to all affected patients.