Literature DB >> 30932711

Open Relationship Prevalence, Characteristics, and Correlates in a Nationally Representative Sample of Canadian Adults.

Nichole Fairbrother1, Trevor A Hart2,3, Malcolm Fairbrother4.   

Abstract

Open relationships are those in which individuals agree to participate in sexual and/or emotional and romantic interactions with more than one partner. Accurate estimates of the prevalence of open relationships, based on representative, unbiased samples, are few, and there are none from outside of the United States. We present findings from a nationally representative sample of 2,003 Canadian adults, administered in 2017 via an online questionnaire. Overall, 2.4% of all participants, and 4.0% of those currently in a relationship, reported currently being in an open relationship. One-fifth of participants reported prior engagement in an open relationship, and 12% reported open as their ideal relationship type. Men, compared with women, were more likely to report prior open relationship engagement and to identify open as their ideal relationship type. Younger participants were more likely both to engage in and to prefer open relationships. Relationship satisfaction did not differ significantly between monogamous and open relationships. Having a match between one's actual relationship type and one's preferred relationship type was associated with greater relationship satisfaction. Findings suggest that, while currently only a small proportion of the population is in an open relationship, interest in open relationships is higher, particularly among younger adults, and open appears to be a viable and important relationship type.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30932711     DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1580667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  14 in total

1.  Are there "Better" and "Worse" Ways to be Consensually Non-Monogamous (CNM)?: CNM Types and CNM-Specific Predictors of Dyadic Adjustment.

Authors:  Terri D Conley; Jennifer L Piemonte
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-07

2.  Comparing the Self-Reported Health, Happiness, and Marital Happiness of a Multinational Sample of Consensually Non-Monogamous Adults with Those of the U.S. General Population: Additional Comparisons by Gender, Number of Sexual Partners, Frequency of Sex, and Marital Status.

Authors:  Derrell W Cox; James R Fleckenstein; Lori R Sims-Cox
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-08

3.  Introduction to the Special Section on Consensual Non-Monogamy.

Authors:  Lisa Dawn Hamilton; Carm De Santis; Ashley E Thompson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-04

4.  Sameness and Difference in Psychological Research on Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships: The Need for Invariance and Equivalence Testing.

Authors:  John K Sakaluk; Christopher Quinn-Nilas; Alexandra N Fisher; Connor E Leshner; Ella Huber; Jessica R Wood
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-08-28

5.  Exploring Minority Stress and Resilience in a Polyamorous Sample.

Authors:  Ryan G Witherspoon; Peter S Theodore
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-09

6.  Internalized Consensual Non-Monogamy Negativity and Relationship Quality Among People Engaged in Polyamory, Swinging, and Open Relationships.

Authors:  Amy C Moors; Heath A Schechinger; Rhonda Balzarini; Sharon Flicker
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-07

7.  Stigmatization of Consensual Non-Monogamous Partners: Perceived Endorsement of Conservation or Openness to Change Values Vary According to Personal Attitudes.

Authors:  David L Rodrigues; Gustavo A Aybar Camposano; Diniz Lopes
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-08-04

8.  Exploring Variations in North American Adults' Attitudes, Interest, Experience, and Outcomes Related to Mixed-Gender Threesomes: A Replication and Extension.

Authors:  Ashley E Thompson; Allison E Cipriano; Kimberley M Kirkeby; Delaney Wilder; Justin J Lehmiller
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-11-11

9.  Assumption of the Myths of Romantic Love: Its Relationship With Sex, Type of Sex-Affective Relationship, and Sexual Orientation.

Authors:  Jenny Cubells-Serra; Alejandro Sánchez-Sicilia; Priscila Astudillo-Mendoza; Neli Escandón-Nagel; María José Baeza-Rivera
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-05-20

10.  "It's a Little Bit Tricky": Results from the POLYamorous Childbearing and Birth Experiences Study (POLYBABES).

Authors:  Samantha Landry; Erika Arseneau; Elizabeth K Darling
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.