Davide Scaglione1, Sara Pinosio2,3, Fabio Marroni1, Eleonora Di Centa1, Alice Fornasiero2, Gabriele Magris4, Simone Scalabrin1, Federica Cattonaro1, Gail Taylor5, Michele Morgante2,4. 1. IGA Technology Services s.r.l., via Jacopo Linussio, Udine, Italy. 2. IGA - Istituto di Genomica Applicata, via Jacopo Linussio, Udine, Italy. 3. Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources, National Research Council, Via Madonna del Piano, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy. 4. Dipartimento di Scienze Agro-alimentari, Università di Udine, Ambientali e Animali (DI4A), Udine, Italy. 5. Centre for Biological Sciences, Life Sciences Building, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The advent of molecular breeding is advocated to improve the productivity and sustainability of second-generation bioenergy crops. Advanced molecular breeding in bioenergy crops relies on the ability to massively sample the genetic diversity. Genotyping-by-sequencing has become a widely adopted method for cost-effective genotyping. It basically requires no initial investment for design as compared with array-based platforms which have been shown to offer very robust assays. The latter, however, has the drawback of being limited to analyse only the genetic diversity accounted during selection of a set of polymorphisms and design of the assay. In contrast, genotyping-by-sequencing with random sampling of genomic loci via restriction enzymes or random priming has been shown to be fast and convenient but lacks the ability to target specific regions of the genome and to maintain high reproducibility across laboratories. METHODS: Here we present a first adoption of single-primer enrichment technology (SPET) which provides a highly efficient and scalable system to obtain targeted sequence-based large genotyping data sets, bridging the gaps between array-based systems and traditional sequencing-based protocols. To fully explore SPET performance, we conducted a benchmark study in ten Zea mays lines and a large-scale study of a natural black poplar population of 540 individuals with the aim of discovering polymorphisms associated with biomass-related traits. KEY RESULTS: Our results showed the ability of this technology to provide dense genotype information on a customized panel of selected polymorphisms, while yielding hundreds of thousands of untargeted variable sites. This provided an ideal resource for association analysis of natural populations harbouring unexplored allelic diversities and structure such as in black poplar. CONCLUSION: The improvement of sequencing throughput and the development of efficient library preparation methods has made it feasible to carry out targeted genotyping-by-sequencing experiments cost-competitively with either random complexity reduction systems or traditional array-based platforms, while maintaining the key advantages of both technologies.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The advent of molecular breeding is advocated to improve the productivity and sustainability of second-generation bioenergy crops. Advanced molecular breeding in bioenergy crops relies on the ability to massively sample the genetic diversity. Genotyping-by-sequencing has become a widely adopted method for cost-effective genotyping. It basically requires no initial investment for design as compared with array-based platforms which have been shown to offer very robust assays. The latter, however, has the drawback of being limited to analyse only the genetic diversity accounted during selection of a set of polymorphisms and design of the assay. In contrast, genotyping-by-sequencing with random sampling of genomic loci via restriction enzymes or random priming has been shown to be fast and convenient but lacks the ability to target specific regions of the genome and to maintain high reproducibility across laboratories. METHODS: Here we present a first adoption of single-primer enrichment technology (SPET) which provides a highly efficient and scalable system to obtain targeted sequence-based large genotyping data sets, bridging the gaps between array-based systems and traditional sequencing-based protocols. To fully explore SPET performance, we conducted a benchmark study in ten Zea mays lines and a large-scale study of a natural black poplar population of 540 individuals with the aim of discovering polymorphisms associated with biomass-related traits. KEY RESULTS: Our results showed the ability of this technology to provide dense genotype information on a customized panel of selected polymorphisms, while yielding hundreds of thousands of untargeted variable sites. This provided an ideal resource for association analysis of natural populations harbouring unexplored allelic diversities and structure such as in black poplar. CONCLUSION: The improvement of sequencing throughput and the development of efficient library preparation methods has made it feasible to carry out targeted genotyping-by-sequencing experiments cost-competitively with either random complexity reduction systems or traditional array-based platforms, while maintaining the key advantages of both technologies.
Authors: Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: D G Wang; J B Fan; C J Siao; A Berno; P Young; R Sapolsky; G Ghandour; N Perkins; E Winchester; J Spencer; L Kruglyak; L Stein; L Hsie; T Topaloglou; E Hubbell; E Robinson; M Mittmann; M S Morris; N Shen; D Kilburn; J Rioux; C Nusbaum; S Rozen; T J Hudson; R Lipshutz; M Chee; E S Lander Journal: Science Date: 1998-05-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Gabor T Marth; Fuli Yu; Amit R Indap; Kiran Garimella; Simon Gravel; Wen Fung Leong; Chris Tyler-Smith; Matthew Bainbridge; Tom Blackwell; Xiangqun Zheng-Bradley; Yuan Chen; Danny Challis; Laura Clarke; Edward V Ball; Kristian Cibulskis; David N Cooper; Bob Fulton; Chris Hartl; Dan Koboldt; Donna Muzny; Richard Smith; Carrie Sougnez; Chip Stewart; Alistair Ward; Jin Yu; Yali Xue; David Altshuler; Carlos D Bustamante; Andrew G Clark; Mark Daly; Mark DePristo; Paul Flicek; Stacey Gabriel; Elaine Mardis; Aarno Palotie; Richard Gibbs Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Robert J Elshire; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Qi Sun; Jesse A Poland; Ken Kawamoto; Edward S Buckler; Sharon E Mitchell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Matteo Dell'Acqua; Daniel M Gatti; Giorgio Pea; Federica Cattonaro; Frederik Coppens; Gabriele Magris; Aye L Hlaing; Htay H Aung; Hilde Nelissen; Joke Baute; Elisabetta Frascaroli; Gary A Churchill; Dirk Inzé; Michele Morgante; Mario Enrico Pè Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Alina Ott; Sanzhen Liu; James C Schnable; Cheng-Ting 'Eddy' Yeh; Kai-Sin Wang; Patrick S Schnable Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: G Taylor; I S Donnison; D Murphy-Bokern; M Morgante; M-B Bogeat-Triboulot; R Bhalerao; M Hertzberg; A Polle; A Harfouche; F Alasia; V Petoussi; D Trebbi; K Schwarz; J J B Keurentjes; M Centritto; B Genty; J Flexas; E Grill; S Salvi; W J Davies Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Santiago Vilanova; David Alonso; Pietro Gramazio; Mariola Plazas; Edgar García-Fortea; Paola Ferrante; Maximilian Schmidt; María José Díez; Björn Usadel; Giovanni Giuliano; Jaime Prohens Journal: Plant Methods Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 4.993
Authors: Lorenzo Barchi; Alberto Acquadro; David Alonso; Giuseppe Aprea; Laura Bassolino; Olivia Demurtas; Paola Ferrante; Pietro Gramazio; Paola Mini; Ezio Portis; Davide Scaglione; Laura Toppino; Santiago Vilanova; María José Díez; Giuseppe Leonardo Rotino; Sergio Lanteri; Jaime Prohens; Giovanni Giuliano Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Jens Keilwagen; Heike Lehnert; Thomas Berner; Sebastian Beier; Uwe Scholz; Axel Himmelbach; Nils Stein; Ekaterina D Badaeva; Daniel Lang; Benjamin Kilian; Bernd Hackauf; Dragan Perovic Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Francesco Pancaldi; Dennis Vlegels; Hugo Rijken; Eibertus N van Loo; Luisa M Trindade Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 5.753