Literature DB >> 30930094

Cryo-EM structures of GPCRs coupled to Gs, Gi and Go.

Javier García-Nafría1, Christopher G Tate2.   

Abstract

Advances in electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) now permit the structure determination of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins by single-particle imaging. A combination of G protein engineering and the development of antibodies that stabilise the heterotrimeric G protein facilitate the formation of stable GPCR-G protein complexes suitable for structural biology. Structures have been determined of GPCRs coupled to either heterotrimeric G proteins (Gs, Gi or Go) or mini-G proteins (mini-Gs or mini-Go) by single-particle cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography, respectively. This review describes the technical breakthroughs allowing their structure determination and compares the different techniques. In addition, we compare the structures of GPCRs coupled either to Gs, Gi or Go and analyse the contributions of amino acid residues to the GPCR-G protein interface. There is no unique set of interactions that specifies coupling either to Gs, Gi or Go. Instead, there is a common core of interactions between the C-terminal α-helix of the G protein α-subunit and helices H3, H5 and H6 of the receptor. In addition, there are varying degrees of interaction between all the other GPCR helices and intracellular loops to five regions of the α-subunit and four regions of the β-subunit. These data support the contention that there is not a simple linear barcode that defines the specificity of G protein coupling and thus how a G protein couples to a GPCR cannot currently be determined from simply analysing amino acid sequences. Although the overall architecture of GPCR-G protein complexes is conserved, there are significant differences in the molecular details. The number and type of molecular interactions between amino acid residues at the interfaces varies, resulting in subtly different orientation and position of the G protein with respect to the GPCR. This in turn affects the interface surface area that varies between 845 Å2 and 1490 Å2, which could impact upon the lifetime of signalling complexes in the cell.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30930094     DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol        ISSN: 0303-7207            Impact factor:   4.102


  43 in total

1.  Signal transduction through Cys-loop receptors is mediated by the nonspecific bumping of closely apposed domains.

Authors:  Gisela D Cymes; Claudio Grosman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The quest for high-resolution G protein-coupled receptor-G protein structures.

Authors:  Reinhard Grisshammer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Novel fluorescent GPCR biosensor detects retinal equilibrium binding to opsin and active G protein and arrestin signaling conformations.

Authors:  Christopher T Schafer; Anthony Shumate; David L Farrens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Probing the correlation between ligand efficacy and conformational diversity at the α1A-adrenoreceptor reveals allosteric coupling of its microswitches.

Authors:  Feng-Jie Wu; Lisa M Williams; Alaa Abdul-Ridha; Avanka Gunatilaka; Tasneem M Vaid; Martina Kocan; Alice R Whitehead; Michael D W Griffin; Ross A D Bathgate; Daniel J Scott; Paul R Gooley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Perspective: Implications of Ligand-Receptor Binding Kinetics for Therapeutic Targeting of G Protein-Coupled Receptors.

Authors:  Wijnand J C van der Velden; Laura H Heitman; Mette M Rosenkilde
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-03-18

6.  Activation of the α2B adrenoceptor by the sedative sympatholytic dexmedetomidine.

Authors:  Daopeng Yuan; Zhongmin Liu; Jonas Kaindl; Shoji Maeda; Jiawei Zhao; Xiaoou Sun; Jun Xu; Peter Gmeiner; Hong-Wei Wang; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 15.040

7.  Structure of the Visual Signaling Complex between Transducin and Phosphodiesterase 6.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Gözde Eskici; Sekar Ramachandran; Frédéric Poitevin; Alpay Burak Seven; Ouliana Panova; Georgios Skiniotis; Richard A Cerione
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Cryo-electron microscopy structure of the glucagon receptor with a dual-agonist peptide.

Authors:  Rulue Chang; Xin Zhang; Anna Qiao; Antao Dai; Matthew J Belousoff; Qiuxiang Tan; Lijun Shao; Li Zhong; Guangyao Lin; Yi-Lynn Liang; Limin Ma; Shuo Han; Dehua Yang; Radostin Danev; Ming-Wei Wang; Denise Wootten; Beili Wu; Patrick M Sexton
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Molecular basis of β-arrestin coupling to formoterol-bound β1-adrenoceptor.

Authors:  Yang Lee; Tony Warne; Rony Nehmé; Shubhi Pandey; Hemlata Dwivedi-Agnihotri; Madhu Chaturvedi; Patricia C Edwards; Javier García-Nafría; Andrew G W Leslie; Arun K Shukla; Christopher G Tate
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  ER/K-link-Leveraging a native protein linker to probe dynamic cellular interactions.

Authors:  Tejas M Gupte; Michael Ritt; Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 1.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.