Literature DB >> 30929477

Single-stage treatment of chronically infected total hip arthroplasty with cementless reconstruction: results in 126 patients with broad inclusion criteria.

B Ji1, T Wahafu1, G Li1, X Zhang1, Y Wang1, M Momin1, L Cao1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Single-stage revision is not widely pursued due to restrictive inclusion criteria. In this study, we evaluated the results of single-stage revision of chronically infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) using broad inclusion criteria and cementless implants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2010 and 2016, 126 patients underwent routine single-stage revision with cementless reconstruction with powdered vancomycin or imipenem poured into the medullary cavity and re-implantation of cementless components. For patients with a culture-negative hip, fungal infections, and multidrug-resistant organisms, a direct intra-articular infusion of pathogen-sensitive antibiotics was performed postoperatively. Recurrence of infection and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Three patients died and 12 patients (none with known recurrent infection) were lost to follow-up. There were 111 remaining patients (60 male, 51 female) with a mean age of 58.7 (sd 12.7; 20 to 79).
RESULTS: Of these 111 patients, 99 (89.2%) were free of infection at a mean follow-up time of 58 months (24 to 107). A recurrent infection was observed in four of the 23 patients (17.4%) with culture-negative infected hip. The success rate in patients with multidrug-resistant organisms was 84.2% (16/19). The mean postoperative Harris hip score was 79.6 points (63 to 92) at the most recent assessment.
CONCLUSION: Routine single-stage revision with cementless reconstruction can be a viable option for the treatment of chronically infected THA. The results of this study will add to the growing body of evidence supporting routine use of single-stage revision for the treatment of chronically infected THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:396-402.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prosthetic hip infection; Single-stage revision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30929477     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B4.BJJ-2018-1109.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  6 in total

1.  Is a preoperative pathogen detection a prerequisite before undergoing one-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection of the hip?

Authors:  Daniel Karczewski; Yannick Seutz; Christian Hipfl; Doruk Akgün; Octavian Andronic; Carsten Perka; Sebastian Hardt
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  What's New in Musculoskeletal Infection.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Keith A Fehring; Angela Hewlett; Carlos A Higuera; Jesse E Otero; Aaron J Tande
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 3.  Systematic review of single stage revision for prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Zachary C Lum; Christopher Thomas Holland; John P Meehan
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  Management of peri-prosthetic joint infection and severe bone loss after total hip arthroplasty using a long-stemmed cemented custom-made articulating spacer (CUMARS).

Authors:  J Quayle; A Barakat; A Klasan; A Mittal; G Chan; J Gibbs; M Edmondson; P Stott
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  A review of current practices in periprosthetic joint infection debridement and revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Humza M Mian; Joseph G Lyons; Joshua Perrin; Andrew W Froehle; Anil B Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-09-01

6.  A Low Percentage of Patients Satisfy Typical Indications for Single-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  M E Dombrowski; A E Wilson; R A Wawrose; M J O'Malley; K L Urish; B A Klatt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.755

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.