Literature DB >> 30928849

Risk assessments for quality-assured, source-segregated composts and anaerobic digestates for a circular bioeconomy in the UK.

Philip J Longhurst1, David Tompkins2, Simon J T Pollard3, Rupert L Hough4, Brian Chambers5, Paul Gale6, Sean Tyrrel1, Raffaella Villa1, Matthew Taylor5, Shaomin Wu7, Ruben Sakrabani1, Audrey Litterick8, Emma Snary6, Paul Leinster1, Nina Sweet2.   

Abstract

A circular economy relies on demonstrating the quality and environmental safety of wastes that are recovered and reused as products. Policy-level risk assessments, using generalised exposure scenarios, and informed by stakeholder communities have been used to appraise the acceptability of necessary changes to legislation, allowing wastes to be valued, reused and marketed. Through an extensive risk assessment exercise, summarised in this paper, we explore the burden of proof required to offer safety assurance to consumer and brand-sensitive food sectors in light of attempts to declassify, as wastes, quality-assured, source-segregated compost and anaerobic digestate products in the United Kingdom. We report the residual microbiological and chemical risks estimated for both products in land application scenarios and discuss these in the context of an emerging UK bioeconomy worth £52bn per annum. Using plausible worst case assumptions, as demanded by the quality food sector, risk estimates and hazard quotients were estimated to be low or negligible. For example, the human health risk of E. coli 0157 illness from exposure to microbial residuals in quality-assured composts, through a ready-to-eat vegetable consumption exposure route, was estimated at ~10-8 per person per annum. For anaerobic digestion residues, 7 × 10-3cases of E. coli 0157 were estimated per annum, a potential contribution of 0.0007% of total UK cases. Hazard quotients for potential chemical contaminants in both products were insufficient in magnitude to merit detailed quantitative risk assessments. Stakeholder engagement and expert review was also a substantive feature of this study. We conclude that quality-assured, source-segregated products applied to land, under UK quality protocols and waste processing standards, pose negligible risks to human, animal, environmental and crop receptors, providing that risk management controls set within the standards and protocols are adhered to. Crown
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioeconomy; Compost; Digestate; Quality; Regulation; Risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30928849     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  3 in total

1.  Ranking hazards pertaining to human health concerns from land application of anaerobic digestate.

Authors:  Rajat Nag; Paul Whyte; Bryan K Markey; Vincent O'Flaherty; Declan Bolton; Owen Fenton; Karl G Richards; Enda Cummins
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Untargeted Metabolomics Profiling of Bioactive Compounds under Varying Digestate Storage Conditions: Assessment of Antioxidant and Antifungal Activity.

Authors:  Jiaxin Lu; Atif Muhmood; Panagiotis Tsapekos; Xian Cui; Yuwen Guo; Yi Zheng; Yizhan Qiu; Pan Wang; Lianhai Ren
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  The Fate of Foodborne Pathogens in Manure Treated Soil.

Authors:  Zoe Black; Igori Balta; Lisa Black; Patrick J Naughton; James S G Dooley; Nicolae Corcionivoschi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.