Literature DB >> 30927270

A practical guide for combining data to model species distributions.

Robert J Fletcher1, Trevor J Hefley2, Ellen P Robertson1, Benjamin Zuckerberg3, Robert A McCleery1, Robert M Dorazio4.   

Abstract

Understanding and accurately modeling species distributions lies at the heart of many problems in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Multiple sources of data are increasingly available for modeling species distributions, such as data from citizen science programs, atlases, museums, and planned surveys. Yet reliably combining data sources can be challenging because data sources can vary considerably in their design, gradients covered, and potential sampling biases. We review, synthesize, and illustrate recent developments in combining multiple sources of data for species distribution modeling. We identify five ways in which multiple sources of data are typically combined for modeling species distributions. These approaches vary in their ability to accommodate sampling design, bias, and uncertainty when quantifying environmental relationships in species distribution models. Many of the challenges for combining data are solved through the prudent use of integrated species distribution models: models that simultaneously combine different data sources on species locations to quantify environmental relationships for explaining species distribution. We illustrate these approaches using planned survey data on 24 species of birds coupled with opportunistically collected eBird data in the southeastern United States. This example illustrates some of the benefits of data integration, such as increased precision in environmental relationships, greater predictive accuracy, and accounting for sample bias. Yet it also illustrates challenges of combining data sources with vastly different sampling methodologies and amounts of data. We provide one solution to this challenge through the use of weighted joint likelihoods. Weighted joint likelihoods provide a means to emphasize data sources based on different criteria (e.g., sample size), and we find that weighting improves predictions for all species considered. We conclude by providing practical guidance on combining multiple sources of data for modeling species distributions.
© 2019 by the Ecological Society of America.

Keywords:  Special Feature: Data Integration for Population Models; citizen science; data fusion; ecological niche model; habitat suitability model; integrated model; spatial point process; species distribution model

Year:  2019        PMID: 30927270     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  8 in total

1.  Long-term trends in the occupancy of ants revealed through use of multi-sourced datasets.

Authors:  Julie K Sheard; Carsten Rahbek; Robert R Dunn; Nathan J Sanders; Nick J B Isaac
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 3.812

2.  A multivariate geostatistical framework for combining multiple indices of abundance for disease vectors and reservoirs: a case study of rattiness in a low-income urban Brazilian community.

Authors:  Max T Eyre; Ticiana S A Carvalho-Pereira; Fábio N Souza; Hussein Khalil; Kathryn P Hacker; Soledad Serrano; Joshua P Taylor; Mitermayer G Reis; Albert I Ko; Mike Begon; Peter J Diggle; Federico Costa; Emanuele Giorgi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Understanding Mosquito Surveillance Data for Analytic Efforts: A Case Study.

Authors:  Heidi E Brown; Luigi Sedda; Chris Sumner; Elene Stefanakos; Irene Ruberto; Matthew Roach
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  Resolving misaligned spatial data with integrated species distribution models.

Authors:  Krishna Pacifici; Brian J Reich; David A W Miller; Brent S Pease
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.

Authors:  Mariano J Feldman; Louis Imbeau; Philippe Marchand; Marc J Mazerolle; Marcel Darveau; Nicole J Fenton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Counting Cats: The integration of expert and citizen science data for unbiased inference of population abundance.

Authors:  Jenni L McDonald; Dave Hodgson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Estimating the movements of terrestrial animal populations using broad-scale occurrence data.

Authors:  Sarah R Supp; Gil Bohrer; John Fieberg; Frank A La Sorte
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.600

8.  Consistent trait-temperature interactions drive butterfly phenology in both incidental and survey data.

Authors:  Elise A Larsen; Michael W Belitz; Robert P Guralnick; Leslie Ries
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.