Literature DB >> 30927264

Opportunistic testing of BRCA1, BRCA2 and mismatch repair genes improves the yield of phenotype driven hereditary cancer gene panels.

Lídia Feliubadaló1,2,3, Adrià López-Fernández4, Marta Pineda1,2,3, Orland Díez5,6, Jesús Del Valle1,2,3, Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez5, Alex Teulé1,2,3, Sara González1,2,3, Neda Stjepanovic4,7, Mónica Salinas1,2,3, Gabriel Capellá1,2,3, Joan Brunet1,8,9, Conxi Lázaro1,2,3, Judith Balmaña4,7.   

Abstract

Multigene panels provide a powerful tool for analyzing several genes simultaneously. We evaluated the frequency of pathogenic variants (PV) in customized predefined panels according to clinical suspicion by phenotype and compared it to the yield obtained in the analysis of our clinical research gene panel. We also investigated mutational yield of opportunistic testing of BRCA1/2 and mismatch repair (MMR) genes in all patients. A total of 1,205 unrelated probands with clinical suspicion of hereditary cancer were screened for germline mutations using panel testing. Overall, 1,048 females and 157 males were analyzed, mean age at cancer diagnosis was 48; 883 had hereditary breast/ovarian cancer-suspicion, 205 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-suspicion, 73 adenomatous-polyposis-suspicion and 44 with other/multiple clinical criteria. At least one PV was found in 150 probands (12%) analyzed by our customized phenotype-driven panel. Tumoral MMR deficiency predicted for the presence of germline MMR gene mutations in patients with HNPCC-suspicion (46/136 vs. 0/56 in patients with and without MMR deficiency, respectively). Opportunistic testing additionally identified five MSH6, one BRCA1 and one BRCA2 carriers (0.6%). The analysis of the extended 24-gene panel provided 25 additional PVs (2%), including in 4 out of 51 individuals harboring MMR-proficient colorectal tumors (2 CHEK2 and 2 ATM). Phenotype-based panels provide a notable rate of PVs with clinical actionability. Opportunistic testing of MMR and BRCA genes leads to a significant straightforward identification of MSH6, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, and endorses the model of opportunistic testing of genes with clinical utility within a standard genetic counseling framework.
© 2019 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actionability; cancer susceptibility; germline cancer panel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30927264     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  14 in total

1.  Multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the province of Ontario.

Authors:  Chloe Mighton; Conxi Lazaro; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Nicholas Watkins; Vanessa Di Gioacchino; Andrew Wong; Martin C Chang; George S Charames
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  SEOM clinical guidelines in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (2019).

Authors:  S González-Santiago; T Ramón Y Cajal; E Aguirre; J E Alés-Martínez; R Andrés; J Balmaña; B Graña; A Herrero; G Llort; A González-Del-Alba
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  A comprehensive custom panel evaluation for routine hereditary cancer testing: improving the yield of germline mutation detection.

Authors:  Carolina Velázquez; Enrique Lastra; Francisco Avila Cobos; Luis Abella; Virginia de la Cruz; Blanca Ascensión Hernando; Lara Hernández; Noemí Martínez; Mar Infante; Mercedes Durán
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D mutations are associated with high susceptibility to ovarian cancer: mutation prevalence and precise risk estimates based on a pooled analysis of ~30,000 cases.

Authors:  Malwina Suszynska; Magdalena Ratajska; Piotr Kozlowski
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.234

5.  BARD1 Pathogenic Variants are Associated with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in a Spanish Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cohort.

Authors:  Paula Rofes; Jesús Del Valle; Sara Torres-Esquius; Lídia Feliubadaló; Agostina Stradella; José Marcos Moreno-Cabrera; Adriana López-Doriga; Elisabet Munté; Rafael De Cid; Olga Campos; Raquel Cuesta; Álex Teulé; Èlia Grau; Judit Sanz; Gabriel Capellá; Orland Díez; Joan Brunet; Judith Balmaña; Conxi Lázaro
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Summary of BARD1 Mutations and Precise Estimation of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks Associated with the Mutations.

Authors:  Malwina Suszynska; Piotr Kozlowski
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Comparison of suspected Lynch syndrome patients carrying BRCA and BRCA-like variants with Lynch syndrome probands: Phenotypic characteristics and pedigree analyses.

Authors:  Yun Xu; Cong Li; Zhimin Wang; Fangqi Liu; Ye Xu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.183

8.  Identification of colorectal cancers with defective DNA damage repair by immunohistochemical profiling of mismatch repair proteins, CDX2 and BRCA1.

Authors:  Savitha Rajarajan; Anupama C E; Betsy Jose; Marjorie Correa; Sagar Sengupta; Jyothi S Prabhu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-01

9.  Exploring the Role of Mutations in Fanconi Anemia Genes in Hereditary Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jesús Del Valle; Paula Rofes; José Marcos Moreno-Cabrera; Adriana López-Dóriga; Sami Belhadj; Gardenia Vargas-Parra; Àlex Teulé; Raquel Cuesta; Xavier Muñoz; Olga Campos; Mónica Salinas; Rafael de Cid; Joan Brunet; Sara González; Gabriel Capellá; Marta Pineda; Lídia Feliubadaló; Conxi Lázaro
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Germline and Somatic BRCA1/2 Mutations in 172 Chinese Women With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Yan You; Lei Li; Junliang Lu; Huanwen Wu; Jing Wang; Jie Gao; Ming Wu; Zhiyong Liang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.