| Literature DB >> 30926898 |
Wei Bai1,2,3,4, Ping Yang1,3, Jie Huang2, Dingbo Chen2, Jingjing Zhang2, Zhaojian Zhang2, Junbo Yang5, Bing Xu6,7.
Abstract
Metasurfaces draw everyone's attention because they can precisely control the phase, amplitude and polarization of emergent light to achieve light field control in recent years. As one of the most practicable devices among the many applications of metasurface, metalens can extremely reduce the size as well as complexity of optical systems and realizes the higher optical quality compared with conventional lens. So it will be very potential to use metalens in integration systems to reaching higher integration and efficiency. In addition, dynamic control is always desirable in optical systems. In this work, we firstly design a near-infrared tunable metalens treating phase change materials as the meta-atoms which makes the tunable metalens become more compact. At designed wavelength of 1.55 μm, the focusing efficiency of our amorphous metalens is more than 16 times of the efficiency when it works at crystalline state, and its focal length can stay almost unchanged when the GST state is switched. The broadband performance of the metalens is also confirmed. This work may bring some good opportunities for the revolution of the next generation tunable integrated optics.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30926898 PMCID: PMC6441036 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41859-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Complex refractive index variance of GST. (a) The real part n versus wavelength (b) The imagery part k versus wavelength for both amorphous state and crystalline state.
Figure 2Structure of unitcell. (a) The overview of unitcell, nanocuboid GST is settled on ITO conductive layer and substrate SiO2, periodic p = 0.7 μm, GST height h = 0.7 μm, length l = 0.35 μm, width w = 0.1 μm. ITO film thickness T = 0.03 μm. The insert is the side view of the unitcell. (b) The overlook of the unitcell, the orientation direction of structure have an angle θ with x axis.
Figure 3(a) The conversion efficiency from LCP to RCP of unitcell versus wavelength for both amorphous GST and crystalline GST. (b) The phase modulation versus rotating angle θ for both states at designed wavelength 1.55 μm. (c) The conversion efficiency from LCP to RCP versus rotating angle θ for both states at 1.55 μm.
Figure 4(a) The overlook of the metalens, the unitcell is arranged with its angle satisfying . (b) The real phase distribution of the metalens with sampling at the center of each unitcell.
Figure 5Focusing contrast for two GST states at designed wavelength 1.55 μm. (a) The light field distribution along z axis for amorphous metalens. (b) The light field distribution along z axis for crystalline metalens. (c) The light intensity in focal plane for amorphous metalens. (d) The light intensity in focal plane for crystalline metalens. (e) The FWHM of the spot in focal plane for x direction. (f) The FWHM of the spot in focal plane for y direction.
Figure 6Focusing contrast for two GST states at designed wavelength 1.65 μm. (a) The light field distribution along z axis for amorphous metalens. (b) The light field distribution along z axis for crystalline metalens (c) The light intensity in focal plane for amorphous metalens. (d) The light intensity in focal plane for crystalline metalens. (e) The FWHM of the spot in focal plane for x direction. (f) The FWHM of the spot in focal plane for y direction.
Figure 7(a) The efficiency of amorphous metalens (blue line) and the contrast ratio between two GST states (orange line) versus wavelength. (b) The focal length (blue line), FWHM (purple line) and diffraction limit (yellow line) versus wavelength for amorphous metalens.