Literature DB >> 30926560

A deep learning approach to estimation of subject-level bias and variance in high angular resolution diffusion imaging.

Allison E Hainline1, Vishwesh Nath2, Prasanna Parvathaneni3, Kurt G Schilling4, Justin A Blaber2, Adam W Anderson4, Hakmook Kang5, Bennett A Landman6.   

Abstract

The ability to evaluate empirical diffusion MRI acquisitions for quality and to correct the resulting imaging metrics allows for improved inference and increased replicability. Previous work has shown promise for estimation of bias and variance of generalized fractional anisotropy (GFA) but comes at the price of computational complexity. This paper aims to provide methods for estimating GFA, bias of GFA and standard deviation of GFA quickly and accurately. In order to provide a method for bias and variance estimation that can return results faster than the previously studied statistical techniques, three deep, fully-connected neural networks are developed for GFA, bias of GFA, and standard deviation of GFA. The results of these networks are compared to the observed values of the metrics as well as those fit from the statistical techniques (i.e. Simulation Extrapolation (SIMEX) for bias estimation and wild bootstrap for variance estimation). Our GFA network provides predictions that are closer to the true GFA values than a Q-ball fit of the observed data (root-mean-square error (RMSE) 0.0077 vs 0.0082, p < .001). The bias network also shows statistically significant improvement in comparison to the SIMEX-estimated error of GFA (RMSE 0.0071 vs. 0.01, p < .001).
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias correction; GFA; HARDI; Measurement error; Neural network; Q-ball

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30926560      PMCID: PMC6818965          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  20 in total

1.  Noise considerations in the determination of diffusion tensor anisotropy.

Authors:  S Skare; T Li; B Nordell; M Ingvar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Statistical artifacts in diffusion tensor MRI (DT-MRI) caused by background noise.

Authors:  P J Basser; S Pajevic
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Q-ball imaging.

Authors:  David S Tuch
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Apparent diffusion coefficients from high angular resolution diffusion imaging: estimation and applications.

Authors:  Maxime Descoteaux; Elaine Angelino; Shaun Fitzgibbons; Rachid Deriche
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Assessment of bias in experimentally measured diffusion tensor imaging parameters using SIMEX.

Authors:  Carolyn B Lauzon; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Brian C Caffo; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Tractography gone wild: probabilistic fibre tracking using the wild bootstrap with diffusion tensor MRI.

Authors:  Derek K Jones
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  A theoretical study of the effect of experimental noise on the measurement of anisotropy in diffusion imaging.

Authors:  M E Bastin; P A Armitage; I Marshall
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Empirical estimation of intravoxel structure with persistent angular structure and Q-ball models of diffusion weighted MRI.

Authors:  Vishwesh Nath; Kurt G Schilling; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Justin Blaber; Allison E Hainline; Zhaohua Ding; Adam Anderson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-03-06

9.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo.

Authors:  P J Basser; J Mattiello; D LeBihan
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1994-03

10.  Empirical single sample quantification of bias and variance in Q-ball imaging.

Authors:  Allison E Hainline; Vishwesh Nath; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Justin A Blaber; Kurt G Schilling; Adam W Anderson; Hakmook Kang; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.